Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #4,119 of 84,120 nationally

St. Mary's Park Eviction Risk: High , San Francisco

Tract 06075025401 · San Francisco, CA · pop 3,819 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Census tract 06075025401 covers part of the St. Mary's Park area of San Francisco, CA, and scores 9/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,819 residents. What pushes it up most is rent-regulation exposure at 10/10.

Risk score
9
High
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 9% Stable renters 35% Owners 56%
Tract context
Occupied units1,357
Renter share44.4%
SVI overall0.53
Poverty rate5.5%
Median income$183,902

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In St. Mary's Park
Low
Within parent city
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#189 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Low
Within county
22 th percentile
Rank, 22nd percentileLowHigh
#188 of 242 tracts In San Francisco
Low
Within state
80 th percentile
Rank, 80th percentileLowHigh
#1,820 of 9,109 tracts In California
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across San Francisco and the region

Centroid at 37.7396, -122.4225 · click any tract to drill in

Why St. Mary's Park scores 9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from San Francisco
9.8
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.6
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
5.5% poverty · this tract
1.4
Supply constraint
$2,750 rent vs county FMR
3.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
10.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from San Francisco
10.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from San Francisco
9.5

How St. Mary's Park compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
St. Mary's Park risk score vs. parent city / county / state9.0This tracttract 0254019.9San Franciscoparent city9.5Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 53

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within St. Mary's Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in St. Mary's Park

21% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well below the San Francisco County average of 37.3%. Running hot, eviction-process difficulty reads 10/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 10/10.

Food insecurity runs 9.5% against 17.8% nationally. 8% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.

SNAP participation runs 7.4% against 15.2% nationally. At $2,750 a month, rents run 11% over what the rest of San Francisco commands. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.

That is riskier than roughly 95% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Social vulnerability reads 5.7/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Rent consumes only 18% of average household income of $183,902, an unusually wide affordability cushion.

Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.5 points hotter. Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06075025401

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06075025401?

Census tract 06075025401 in the St. Mary's Park neighborhood scores 9/10 (High tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06075025401?

Median gross rent is $2,750/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06075025401?

5.5% of residents in tract 06075025401 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,819.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06075025401?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 53th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 36th, household 46th, minority 68th, housing 68th.
Q5

Is tract 06075025401 considered part of St. Mary's Park?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 06075025401 fall within St. Mary's Park (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 06075025401 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.1% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 06075025401 compare to San Francisco overall?

Tract 06075025401 scores 9/10, lower than the parent city of San Francisco at 9.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from San Francisco eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 06075025401 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 69% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in San Francisco

Top eight tracts in San Francisco ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related