Census Tract · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally
Foster City Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06081608024 ·
San Mateo, CA · pop 3,192
06081608024 is a census tract in Foster City, CA. It scores 6.4/10 for landlords. It is home to 3,192 residents. Cost burden runs 27% here against 44.9% across San Mateo County.
Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 10%Stable renters 28%Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units1,307
Renter share38.2%
SVI overall0.22
Poverty rate1.0%
Median income$200,125
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
25th percentile
#7 of 9 tracts In Foster City
Low
Within county
21th percentile
#137 of 173 tracts In San Mateo
Low
Within state
30th percentile
#6,341 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
National
81th percentile
#16,032 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Foster City and the region
Centroid at 37.5499, -122.2783 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foster City scores 6.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Foster City
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
1.0% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foster City
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foster City
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foster City
5.1
How Foster City compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 22
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
5.2%Housing insecurity
2.6%Utility-shutoff threat
6.3%Food insecurity
4.0%SNAP enrollment
3.7%Transit barriers
3.1%No health insurance
10.4%Frequent mental distress
18.9%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Foster City
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. The severe-burden share is 24%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Running cool, court filing pressure reads 1.4/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.1/10. Food insecurity runs 6.3% against 17.8% nationally.
Housing insecurity runs 5.2% against 14.2% nationally. Nationally it ranks #16,032 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 2.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 1%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the San Mateo County average of 7.0 closely.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06081608024
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081608024?
Census tract 06081608024 in Foster City scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06081608024?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 27% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06081608024?
1.0% of residents in tract 06081608024 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,192.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06081608024?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 22th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 7th, household 21th, minority 77th, housing 47th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06081608024 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06081608024 compare to Foster City overall?
Tract 06081608024 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Foster City at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foster City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Foster City
Top eight tracts in Foster City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.