Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #16,032 of 84,120 nationally

Foster City Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06081608002 · San Mateo, CA · pop 3,551

Tract 06081608002 sits in Foster City, CA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 6.4/10. Population here is 3,551. Severe burden reaches 33%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.

Risk score
6.4
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 11% Owners 81%
Tract context
Occupied units1,300
Renter share19.4%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate2.4%
Median income$226,429

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#9 of 9 tracts In Foster City
Very Low
Within county
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#138 of 173 tracts In San Mateo
Low
Within state
30 th percentile
Rank, 30th percentileLowHigh
#6,341 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
National
81 th percentile
Rank, 81st percentileLowHigh
#16,032 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Foster City and the region

Centroid at 37.5485, -122.2676 · click any tract to drill in

Why Foster City scores 6.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Foster City
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
2.4% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foster City
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foster City
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foster City
5.1

How Foster City compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Foster City risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.4This tracttract 6080027.0Foster Cityparent city7.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Foster City

The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10. On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 1.4/10.

Sitting well above the midpoint, local political climate reads 8.1/10. Adults with no health insurance runs 3.1% against 11.3% nationally.

Against San Mateo County at 44.9%, 41% of renters here are cost-burdened. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 2.7% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the national scale it lands near the 81st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.

Only 19% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.1 points cooler.

Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

It tracks the San Mateo County average of 7.0 closely.

All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.

Frequently asked

About tract 06081608002

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081608002?

Census tract 06081608002 in Foster City scores 6.4/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06081608002?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06081608002?

2.4% of residents in tract 06081608002 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,551.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06081608002?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 68th, minority 77th, housing 2th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06081608002 struggle to pay rent?

About 5.3% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 2.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06081608002 compare to Foster City overall?

Tract 06081608002 scores 6.4/10, lower than the parent city of Foster City at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foster City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Foster City

Top eight tracts in Foster City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related