Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #15,451 of 84,120 nationally

Foster City Eviction Risk: Elevated

Tract 06081608200 · San Mateo, CA · pop 3,798

06081608200 is a census tract in Foster City, CA. It scores 6.5/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,798. The clearest offset is economic stress at 1/10.

Risk score
6.5
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 30% Owners 55%
Tract context
Occupied units1,437
Renter share44.8%
SVI overall0.47
Poverty rate3.8%
Median income$181,625

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
38 th percentile
Rank, 38th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 9 tracts In Foster City
Low
Within county
26 th percentile
Rank, 26th percentileLowHigh
#128 of 173 tracts In San Mateo
Low
Within state
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#6,120 of 9,109 tracts In California
Low
National
82 th percentile
Rank, 82nd percentileLowHigh
#15,451 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Foster City and the region

Centroid at 37.5684, -122.2596 · click any tract to drill in

Why Foster City scores 6.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Foster City
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
3.8% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foster City
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foster City
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foster City
5.1

How Foster City compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Foster City risk score vs. parent city / county / state6.5This tracttract 6082007.0Foster Cityparent city7.0Countyavg tract in county7.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 47

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Foster City

Cost burden runs 33% here against 44.9% across San Mateo County. On the softer side, court filing pressure reads 1.4/10.

On the high side, local political climate reads 8.1/10. SNAP participation runs 5.8% against 15.2% nationally.

The severe-burden share is 9%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. Adults with no health insurance runs 4.0% against 11.3% nationally. Nationally it ranks #15,451 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

Social vulnerability reads 5.3/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the CA average is 7.5, so this tract runs 1.0 points cooler.

Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap. It tracks the San Mateo County average of 7.0 closely.

Average gross rent is $3,501, close to the Foster City average. Annual rent works out to 23% of average household income of $181,625.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 06081608200

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081608200?

Census tract 06081608200 in Foster City scores 6.5/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 06081608200?

Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 33% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 06081608200?

3.8% of residents in tract 06081608200 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,798.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 06081608200?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 47th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 82th, minority 80th, housing 54th.
Q5

What share of households in tract 06081608200 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6

How does tract 06081608200 compare to Foster City overall?

Tract 06081608200 scores 6.5/10, lower than the parent city of Foster City at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foster City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Foster City

Top eight tracts in Foster City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related