Census Tract · Ranked #13,349 of 84,120 nationally
Foster City Eviction Risk: Elevated
Tract 06081608025 ·
San Mateo, CA · pop 6,340
With a score of 6.9/10, tract 06081608025 in Foster City, CA reads elevated for landlord eviction risk. Population here is 6,340. This is renter territory: 86% of occupied units are tenant-occupied.
Risk score
6.9
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 38%Stable renters 48%Owners 14%
Tract context
Occupied units2,604
Renter share85.9%
SVI overall0.58
Poverty rate7.7%
Median income$155,833
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
88th percentile
#2 of 9 tracts In Foster City
High
Within county
49th percentile
#88 of 173 tracts In San Mateo
Moderate
Within state
41th percentile
#5,398 of 9,109 tracts In California
Moderate
National
84th percentile
#13,349 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Foster City and the region
Centroid at 37.5687, -122.2746 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foster City scores 6.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Foster City
8.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
7.9
State political climate
California legislature & governorship
6.8
Economic stress
7.7% poverty · this tract
1.9
Supply constraint
$3,501 rent vs county FMR
5.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Foster City
5.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
6.8
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Foster City
4.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Foster City
5.1
How Foster City compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
7.4%Housing insecurity
3.6%Utility-shutoff threat
9.2%Food insecurity
6.4%SNAP enrollment
5.1%Transit barriers
4.5%No health insurance
12.0%Frequent mental distress
19.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Foster City
The main counterweight is court filing pressure at 1.4/10. 23% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1.9/10.
Running hot, local political climate reads 8.1/10. SNAP participation runs 6.4% against 15.2% nationally.
Inability to pay a utility bill runs 3.6% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. On the national scale it lands near the 84th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 6.2/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Rent takes 30% or more of income for 44% of renters.
It tracks the San Mateo County average of 7.0 closely. Average gross rent is $3,501, close to the Foster City average.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 06081608025
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081608025?
Census tract 06081608025 in Foster City scores 6.9/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 06081608025?
Median gross rent is $3,501/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 44% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 06081608025?
7.7% of residents in tract 06081608025 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 6,340.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 06081608025?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 58th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 11th, household 83th, minority 81th, housing 86th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 06081608025 struggle to pay rent?
About 7.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 3.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 06081608025 compare to Foster City overall?
Tract 06081608025 scores 6.9/10, right in line with the parent city of Foster City at 7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Foster City; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Foster City
Top eight tracts in Foster City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.