Foster City Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 06081608025 · San Mateo, CA · pop 6,340
Tract 06081608025, home to 6,340 residents in Foster City, scores 5.2/10 for landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #44,497 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
Rent eats 30% or more of income for 44% of renter households, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $3,501 a month while the average household earns $155,833 a year, roughly 27% of income at the averages. Renters make up 86% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Foster City and the region
Centroid at 37.5687, -122.2746 · click any tract to drill in
Why Foster City scores 4.6
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Foster City compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 58
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 11%Socioeconomic
- 83%Household composition
- 81%Racial/ethnic minority
- 86%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 7.4%Housing insecurity
- 3.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 9.2%Food insecurity
- 6.4%SNAP enrollment
- 5.1%Transit barriers
- 4.5%No health insurance
- 12.0%Frequent mental distress
- 19.5%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Foster City
The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 6.8/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Foster City, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.
Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the San Mateo County average of 5.1 and below the California statewide average of 6.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.
In CDC survey modeling, about 7.4% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 3.6% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.
The tract is predominantly Asian and ranks around the 58th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a middle-of-the-pack reading for social vulnerability.
For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.
About tract 06081608025
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 06081608025?
What is the average rent in tract 06081608025?
What is the poverty rate in tract 06081608025?
How socially vulnerable is tract 06081608025?
What share of households in tract 06081608025 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 06081608025 compare to Foster City overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Foster City
Top eight tracts in Foster City ranked by composite eviction-risk score.