Skip to content
Mono Vista, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 3,675 residents

Mono Vista, CA Eviction Risk: HIGH

Tuolumne County · Population 3,675

In 2026
Risk score
7.5
HIGH

26th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.6 Average4.3 Now7.5
8.3 2.6 1976 · score 2.7 1977 · score 2.7 1978 · score 2.7 1979 · score 2.6 1980 · score 2.7 1981 · score 2.8 1982 · score 2.9 1983 · score 2.9 1984 · score 2.8 1985 · score 2.8 1986 · score 2.7 1987 · score 2.6 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.8 1991 · score 2.9 1992 · score 3.3 1993 · score 3.4 1994 · score 3.4 1995 · score 3.3 1996 · score 3.3 1997 · score 3.3 1998 · score 3.3 1999 · score 3.3 2000 · score 3.8 2001 · score 3.9 2002 · score 4.1 2003 · score 4.1 2004 · score 4.1 2005 · score 4.0 2006 · score 4.0 2007 · score 4.1 2008 · score 4.7 2009 · score 5.0 2010 · score 5.1 2011 · score 5.2 2012 · score 5.1 2013 · score 5.1 2014 · score 5.1 2015 · score 5.1 2016 · score 5.2 2017 · score 5.2 2018 · score 5.3 2019 · score 6.1 2020 · score 8.3 2021 · score 8.0 2022 · score 7.8 2023 · score 7.6 2024 · score 7.8 2025 · score 7.6 2026 · score 7.5

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.7 Regional 4.7 State 6.8 Economic 6.3 Supply 6.8 Rent Control 9.6 Eviction 6.4 Tenant 4.4 Housing 7.1 7.5 HIGH
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +21.9% (2024)
    4.7
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.7
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    8.6% poverty · 7.0% unemp.
    6.3
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,104 average · 25.7% renters
    6.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    51.0% of income on rent
    9.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    279 days filing → judgment
    6.4
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    25.7% renters
    4.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Mono Vista and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Mono Vista compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Tuolumne County
High
#4 of 19 cities
Rank in county, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#4 of 19 cities in Tuolumne County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Low
#1226 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#1226 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Mono Vista risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Mono Vista: 7.57.5Mono VistaThis cityCounty: 7.37.3Countyavg in countyState: 8.48.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 7.5
    / 10 · HIGH
    The verdict

    A High-tier market.

    Composite 7.5/10. High statutory friction with active tenant counsel, so assume defenses on every filing. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.8 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 279d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,104/mo. A contested eviction takes 279 days and costs $17,103–$32,305 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 25.7%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 3,675 residents, 25.7% rent. 51% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 8.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.7
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4.7 and 4.7 (GOP margin +21.9% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.4, housing court bias 7.1, rent-control risk 9.6. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.3
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.3. Supply constraint: 6.8. The numbers behind those: 8.6% poverty, 7.0% unemployment, 51% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Mono Vista sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Modesto, CA · 262d · ~$25.5k all-in ($97/day) · score 8.1 Modesto Turlock, CA · 255d · ~$27.3k all-in ($107/day) · score 8 Turlock Los Angeles, CA · 273d · ~$22.4k all-in ($82/day) · score 9.9 Los Angeles San Diego, CA · 277d · ~$25.9k all-in ($94/day) · score 8.7 San Diego San Jose, CA · 261d · ~$24.2k all-in ($93/day) · score 9.2 San Jose San Francisco, CA · 273d · ~$23.9k all-in ($88/day) · score 9.7 San Francisco Fresno, CA · 279d · ~$24.4k all-in ($88/day) · score 8.9 Fresno Sacramento, CA · 281d · ~$25.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 9.2 Sacramento Long Beach, CA · 291d · ~$26.4k all-in ($91/day) · score 9.6 Long Beach Oakland, CA · 282d · ~$24.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 9.9 Oakland Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Mono Vista
Mono Vista · 279d · ~$24.7k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Mono Vista, CA

Landlording in Mono Vista, California, presents a high-friction environment where attorney involvement on every filing is the norm. The Eviction Risk Score is 7.5/10 (HIGH tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a High-friction landlord market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Mono Vista is a city of 3,675 residents where 25.7% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 51.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,104/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Mono Vista eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.4/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Mono Vista closes 279 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Mono Vista's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Mono Vista runs $17,103 to $32,305 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 279 days of typical timeline and $2,104/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.4/10 in Mono Vista, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (9.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Mono Vista: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a HIGH tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $32,305 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Mono Vista

Trap · 8.6%
Local poverty rate is 8.6%, and the rent-burden distribution skews the eviction-filings curve toward higher volume in Tuolumne County. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 9.6/10. Tenant organizing is most active in the rental concentration corridors.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is "just cause" eviction in Mono Vista?

"Just cause" means you need a specific, legally recognized reason to evict a tenant in Mono Vista, as it's required statewide in California. Reasons can include non-payment of rent, lease violations, or owner move-in. You cannot simply terminate a tenancy without cause if the tenant has lived there for 12 months or more.
Q2

How much can I charge for a security deposit in Mono Vista?

You can charge a maximum of 1.00 month's rent for a security deposit in Mono Vista, consistent with statewide California law. This applies to unfurnished residential properties.
Q3

Can I evict a tenant for having a Section 8 voucher in Mono Vista?

No, you cannot. California has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot discriminate against a tenant because they pay rent using a Section 8 voucher or any other lawful source of income.
Q4

What's the most common mistake landlords make during an eviction in California?

The most common mistake is failing to follow the strict notice requirements or improper service of documents. Any procedural error can lead to a judge dismissing your case, forcing you to start the entire, lengthy process over again. This is why legal counsel is so critical.
Q5

How long do I have to return a security deposit after a tenant moves out?

You have 21 days from the tenant's move-out date to return their security deposit, along with an itemized statement of any deductions, in Mono Vista.
Q6

Is it really worth offering "cash for keys" to a non-paying tenant?

Absolutely. Given the average 279-day eviction timeline and $17,103, $32,305 cost in Mono Vista, offering a tenant a few thousand dollars to move out voluntarily and quickly can save you significantly more in lost rent, legal fees, and property damage. It's often the most financially sound decision.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 7.5/10 places Mono Vista in the 26th percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.