Skip to content
Knights Landing, California eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,099 residents

Knights Landing, CA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Yolo County · Population 1,099

In 2026
Risk score
5.6
ELEVATED

32th percentile, California.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average3.3 Now5.6
10 5 1976 · score 1.5 1977 · score 1.6 1978 · score 1.6 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.6 1981 · score 1.6 1982 · score 1.6 1983 · score 1.6 1984 · score 1.6 1985 · score 1.5 1986 · score 1.5 1987 · score 1.6 1988 · score 1.8 1989 · score 1.9 1990 · score 2.0 1991 · score 2.0 1992 · score 2.6 1993 · score 2.7 1994 · score 2.7 1995 · score 2.7 1996 · score 2.8 1997 · score 2.8 1998 · score 2.8 1999 · score 2.9 2000 · score 2.7 2001 · score 2.8 2002 · score 2.9 2003 · score 2.9 2004 · score 3.0 2005 · score 3.0 2006 · score 3.1 2007 · score 3.2 2008 · score 3.9 2009 · score 4.0 2010 · score 4.1 2011 · score 4.2 2012 · score 4.1 2013 · score 4.2 2014 · score 4.3 2015 · score 4.4 2016 · score 4.7 2017 · score 4.9 2018 · score 5.1 2019 · score 5.3 2020 · score 6.1 2021 · score 6.1 2022 · score 6.1 2023 · score 6.1 2024 · score 5.9 2025 · score 5.0 2026 · score 5.6

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.4 Regional 7.4 State 6.8 Economic 9.0 Supply 2.1 Rent Control 5.0 Eviction 6.1 Tenant 2.1 Housing 4.5 5.6 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +36.2% (2024)
    7.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.4
  3. State political climate
    California legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    27.7% poverty · 11.2% unemp.
    9.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,862 average · 50.1% renters
    2.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    38.3% of income on rent
    5.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    285 days filing → judgment
    6.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    50.1% renters
    2.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Knights Landing and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Knights Landing compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Yolo County
Low
#13 of 16 cities
Rank in county, 20th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 16 cities in Yolo County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in California
Low
#1106 of 1,594 cities
Rank in state, 31st percentileLowHigh
#1106 of 1,594 cities in California for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Knights Landing risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Knights Landing: 5.65.6Knights LandingThis cityCounty: 5.85.8Countyavg in countyState: 7.27.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 5.6
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 5.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+4.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 285d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,862/mo. A contested eviction takes 285 days and costs $15,427–$35,380 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 50.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,099 residents, 50.1% rent. 38% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 27.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.4 and 7.4 (Dem margin +36.2% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Long calendar, heavy friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.1, housing court bias 4.5, rent-control risk 5. The slow part is the calendar, not the motion practice.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 9. Supply constraint: 2.1. The numbers behind those: 27.7% poverty, 11.2% unemployment, 38% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Knights Landing sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Sacramento, CA · 281d · ~$25.0k all-in ($89/day) · score 7.6 Sacramento Elk Grove, CA · 245d · ~$24.4k all-in ($100/day) · score 7.2 Elk Grove Roseville, CA · 266d · ~$28.2k all-in ($106/day) · score 6 Roseville Fairfield, CA · 246d · ~$24.7k all-in ($100/day) · score 6.8 Fairfield Vacaville, CA · 292d · ~$24.6k all-in ($84/day) · score 6.1 Vacaville Arden-Arcade, CA · 279d · ~$26.4k all-in ($94/day) · score 8 Arden-Arcade Citrus Heights, CA · 276d · ~$25.3k all-in ($92/day) · score 7.5 Citrus Heights Folsom, CA · 257d · ~$25.6k all-in ($100/day) · score 6.4 Folsom Rancho Cordova, CA · 271d · ~$25.7k all-in ($95/day) · score 7.9 Rancho Cordova Napa, CA · 285d · ~$25.5k all-in ($89/day) · score 5.2 Napa Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Knights Landing
Knights Landing · 285d · ~$25.4k all-in ($89/day) · score 5.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Knights Landing, CA

Landlording in Knights Landing, California, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.6/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Knights Landing is a city of 1,099 residents where 50.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 38.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,862/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Knights Landing eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Knights Landing closes 285 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Knights Landing's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Knights Landing runs $15,427 to $35,380 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 285 days of typical timeline and $1,862/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.1/10 in Knights Landing, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In California, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Knights Landing: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match California's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $35,380 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Knights Landing

Trap · 5/10
The 5/10 score combines local political climate, court bias, cost-of-eviction, tenant organizing strength, and the likelihood of new tenant-protective legislation. See the breakdown above for Knights Landing-specific sub-scores.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What if my tenant claims they lost their job and can't pay rent?

Sympathy is one thing, but your mortgage still needs to be paid. Offer resources for rental assistance if you know of any, but proceed with the 3-day notice. You can always pause the eviction process if they secure assistance or agree to a payment plan. Don't let empathy stop you from protecting your investment.

Q2

Can I just change the locks if they don't leave after the 3-day notice?

Absolutely not. This is an illegal "self-help" eviction and will get you into serious legal trouble in California. You could face huge fines and be forced to pay the tenant damages. Always go through the court process, no matter how long or frustrating it is.

Q3

Do I really need an attorney for an eviction in Knights Landing?

Yes. For a 5/10 risk score and 285-day timeline, you absolutely need an attorney. The laws are complex, tenant protections are strong, and judges are particular. Trying to do it yourself is a false economy that will almost certainly cost you more in lost rent and legal mistakes.

Q4

How do I make sure my security deposit deductions are legal?

Take detailed photos and videos of the property before a tenant moves in and after they move out. Provide an itemized statement of deductions within 21 days, clearly explaining each charge. Only deduct for actual damages beyond normal wear and tear, or for unpaid rent. Keep all receipts for repairs. Refer to California security deposit rules.

Q5

What if my tenant tries to fight the eviction?

They probably will. That's why the timeline is 285 days. This is where your attorney earns their fee. They will handle court appearances, negotiations, and filings. Do not try to negotiate directly with a tenant who has legal representation without your own lawyer present.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 5.6/10 places Knights Landing in the 32nd percentile of California cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.