Skip to content
Moodus, Connecticut eviction risk overview
City brief · 2,042 residents

Moodus, CT Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Middlesex County · Population 2,042

In 2026
Risk score
5.5
ELEVATED

1th percentile, Connecticut.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.4 Average3.8 Now5.5
6.2 2.4 1976 · score 2.6 1977 · score 2.5 1978 · score 2.4 1979 · score 2.4 1980 · score 2.5 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.5 1984 · score 2.4 1985 · score 2.4 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.4 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.9 1991 · score 3.0 1992 · score 3.1 1993 · score 3.1 1994 · score 3.1 1995 · score 3.1 1996 · score 3.6 1997 · score 3.6 1998 · score 3.6 1999 · score 3.6 2000 · score 3.7 2001 · score 3.8 2002 · score 3.9 2003 · score 4.0 2004 · score 3.9 2005 · score 3.9 2006 · score 3.9 2007 · score 4.0 2008 · score 4.5 2009 · score 4.7 2010 · score 4.8 2011 · score 4.9 2012 · score 4.8 2013 · score 4.7 2014 · score 4.6 2015 · score 4.6 2016 · score 4.5 2017 · score 4.5 2018 · score 4.5 2019 · score 4.5 2020 · score 6.2 2021 · score 6.0 2022 · score 5.8 2023 · score 5.8 2024 · score 5.6 2025 · score 5.5 2026 · score 5.5

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.8 Regional 5.2 State 5.8 Economic 1.8 Supply 7.7 Rent Control 1.5 Eviction 5.7 Tenant 8.3 Housing 2.0 5.5 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +16.3% (2020)
    3.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.2
  3. State political climate
    Connecticut legislature & governorship
    5.8
  4. Economic stress
    3.7% poverty · 4.3% unemp.
    1.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,157 average · 30.6% renters
    7.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    15.0% of income on rent
    1.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    144 days filing → judgment
    5.7
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    30.6% renters
    8.3
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.0
Geographic context

Risk heat across Moodus and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Moodus compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Middlesex County
Very Low
#15 of 15 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileLowHigh
#15 of 15 cities in Middlesex County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Connecticut
Very Low
#213 of 214 cities
Rank in state, 1st percentileLowHigh
#213 of 214 cities in Connecticut for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Moodus risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Moodus: 5.55.5MoodusThis cityCounty: 6.36.3Countyavg in countyState: 6.76.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 5.5
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 5.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.9 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 144d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,157/mo. A contested eviction takes 144 days and costs $5,608–$13,170 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 30.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 2,042 residents, 30.6% rent. 15% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 3.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.8 and 5.2 (Dem margin +16.3% (2020)). State climate at 5.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 5.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 5.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.7, housing court bias 2, rent-control risk 1.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 1.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 1.8. Supply constraint: 7.7. The numbers behind those: 3.7% poverty, 4.3% unemployment, 15% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Moodus sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Bridgeport, CT · 150d · ~$11.5k all-in ($77/day) · score 7.6 Bridgeport New Haven, CT · 136d · ~$11.1k all-in ($81/day) · score 7.5 New Haven Hartford, CT · 133d · ~$11.1k all-in ($84/day) · score 7.6 Hartford Waterbury, CT · 129d · ~$9.9k all-in ($76/day) · score 7.2 Waterbury New Britain, CT · 151d · ~$10.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 7 New Britain West Hartford, CT · 150d · ~$11.3k all-in ($75/day) · score 6 West Hartford Bristol, CT · 138d · ~$9.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 6.8 Bristol Meriden, CT · 127d · ~$10.7k all-in ($84/day) · score 6.9 Meriden West Haven, CT · 133d · ~$10.9k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 West Haven Milford, CT · 138d · ~$10.6k all-in ($77/day) · score 6.5 Milford Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Moodus
Moodus · 144d · ~$9.4k all-in ($65/day) · score 5.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Moodus, CT

Landlording in Moodus, Connecticut, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.5/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Moodus is a city of 2,042 residents where 30.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 15.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,157/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Moodus eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.7/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Moodus closes 144 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Moodus's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Moodus runs $5,608 to $13,170 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 144 days of typical timeline and $1,157/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 8.3/10 in Moodus, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Connecticut, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Moodus: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Connecticut's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $13,170 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Moodus

Trap · 1.5/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Moodus's 4.4/10 is below the Connecticut state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 1.5/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 1,232 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.80× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 16,835 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 98,107.

  • 1,232Past month
  • 16,835Past 12 months
  • 0.80×vs baseline (past mo)
Notice requirement: at least three days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: $175 filing fee.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)2023-05-01: 1,625 filings (1.02× hist)2023-06-01: 1,819 filings (1.07× hist)2023-07-01: 1,678 filings (0.96× hist)2023-08-01: 1,941 filings (1.05× hist)2023-09-01: 1,695 filings (0.97× hist)2023-10-01: 1,904 filings (1.03× hist)2023-11-01: 1,763 filings (1.08× hist)2023-12-01: 1,612 filings (0.98× hist)2024-01-01: 1,742 filings (1.00× hist)2024-02-01: 1,519 filings (0.96× hist)2024-03-01: 1,634 filings (0.97× hist)2024-04-01: 1,631 filings (1.06× hist)2024-05-01: 1,554 filings (0.98× hist)2024-06-01: 1,585 filings (0.93× hist)2024-07-01: 1,833 filings (1.04× hist)2024-08-01: 1,749 filings (0.95× hist)2024-09-01: 1,808 filings (1.03× hist)2024-10-01: 1,813 filings (0.98× hist)2024-11-01: 1,495 filings (0.92× hist)2024-12-01: 1,694 filings (1.02× hist)2025-01-01: 1,621 filings (0.93× hist)2025-02-01: 1,493 filings (0.96× hist)2025-03-01: 1,668 filings (0.99× hist)2025-04-01: 1,373 filings (0.89× hist)2025-05-01: 1,318 filings (0.83× hist)2025-06-01: 1,376 filings (0.81× hist)2025-07-01: 1,452 filings (0.83× hist)2025-08-01: 1,446 filings (0.78× hist)2025-09-01: 1,595 filings (0.91× hist)2025-10-01: 1,504 filings (0.81× hist)2025-11-01: 1,253 filings (0.77× hist)2025-12-01: 1,444 filings (0.87× hist)2026-01-01: 1,476 filings (0.85× hist)2026-02-01: 1,332 filings (0.86× hist)2026-03-01: 1,407 filings (0.83× hist)2026-04-01: 1,232 filings (0.80× hist)
Filings dropped 7% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in Moodus?

No, not "any" reason. While Connecticut doesn't have statewide just-cause eviction, you still need a legal reason like non-payment of rent, lease violations, or the end of a lease term (with proper notice). You can't evict someone out of spite or discrimination. Always follow the specific notice requirements for the reason you're using.

Q2

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the court orders an eviction?

You cannot physically remove them yourself. After the court grants you possession, you must get a State Marshal to execute the "Summary Process Execution." The Marshal will serve the tenant with a notice to vacate and then physically remove them if they still don't leave. Trying to do it yourself can lead to criminal charges.

Q3

Can I keep the security deposit for normal wear and tear?

No. Normal wear and tear, like faded paint or minor scuffs, is not a valid reason to deduct from a security deposit. You can only deduct for actual damages beyond normal wear and tear, unpaid rent, or utility bills. Make sure you have clear documentation (photos, invoices) to back up any deductions.

Q4

Is rent control a risk in Moodus?

The rent-control-risk sub-score for Moodus is 1.5/10, which is very low. Connecticut does not have statewide rent control. While local municipalities theoretically could enact it, there's no indication of it being a significant threat in Moodus. However, always stay informed about Connecticut rent control rules as things can change.

Q5

What if my tenant claims their income is from Section 8?

Connecticut has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because their income comes from a program like Section 8. You must treat them like any other applicant and apply your standard screening criteria. If they meet your other qualifications, you cannot reject them based on their income source.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 5.5/10 places Moodus in the 1st percentile of Connecticut cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.