Skip to content
Witches Woods, Connecticut eviction risk overview
City brief · 382 residents

Witches Woods, CT Eviction Risk: LOW

Windham County · Population 382

In 2026
Risk score
3.7
LOW

16th percentile, Connecticut.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

Has Witches Woods been getting tougher on landlords? 1976 to 2026

Min3.1 Average3.6 Now3.7
4.7 3.1
Operator read

Of the 18 cities we track in the county, Witches Woods sits #17, closer to the cautious end of its county cohort than the score alone suggests. The 3.7/10 score has ranged only 3.1 to 4.7 across the 50-year reconstruction, so the environment is stable, not just currently favorable. The one number worth watching is tenant-organizing strength at 1/10, since that is the input with the most room to move.

What do renters in Witches Woods earn, and what are they paying?

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

What is actually driving the Witches Woods score?

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.8 Regional 5.2 State 5.8 Economic 5.2 Supply 1.0 Rent Control 5.0 Eviction 5.6 Tenant 1.0 Housing 3.8 3.7 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +4.3% (2020)
    3.8
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.2
  3. State political climate
    Connecticut legislature & governorship
    5.8
  4. Economic stress
    18.0% poverty · 13.4% unemp.
    5.2
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,118 average · 48.5% renters
    1.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    30.0% of income on rent
    5.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    140 days filing → judgment
    5.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    48.5% renters
    1.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Witches Woods and the region

Click any city to see its score

Where does Witches Woods sit in the county pecking order?

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Windham County
Very Low
#17 of 18 cities
Rank in county, 6th percentileLowHigh
#17 of 18 cities in Windham County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Connecticut
Very Low
#187 of 214 cities
Rank in state, 13th percentileLowHigh
#187 of 214 cities in Connecticut for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Witches Woods risk score vs. county / state / U.S.3.7Witches WoodsThis city5.7Countyavg in county5.7Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avg

Connecticut landlord-tenant law

Eviction rules are set at the state level. These are the Connecticut statutes, timelines and dollar figures that govern every property on this page.

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.7
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.7/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 140d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,118/mo. A contested eviction takes 140 days and costs $5,386–$17,183 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026
  3. 48.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 382 residents, 48.5% rent. 30% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 18.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026
  4. 4.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.8 and 5.2 (GOP margin +4.3% (2020)). State climate at 5.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 5.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 5.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.6, housing court bias 3.8, rent-control risk 5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.6 since '00
    197620012026
  6. 5.2
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.2. Supply constraint: 1. The numbers behind those: 18.0% poverty, 13.4% unemployment, 30% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Witches Woods sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Hartford, CT · 133d · ~$11.1k all-in ($84/day) · score 6.9 Hartford New Britain, CT · 151d · ~$10.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 6.6 New Britain West Hartford, CT · 150d · ~$11.3k all-in ($75/day) · score 4.6 West Hartford Bristol, CT · 138d · ~$9.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.9 Bristol Meriden, CT · 127d · ~$10.7k all-in ($84/day) · score 6.1 Meriden East Hartford, CT · 153d · ~$11.5k all-in ($75/day) · score 5.9 East Hartford Bridgeport, CT · 150d · ~$11.5k all-in ($77/day) · score 6.5 Bridgeport Stamford, CT · 146d · ~$11.1k all-in ($76/day) · score 6 Stamford New Haven, CT · 136d · ~$11.1k all-in ($81/day) · score 6.9 New Haven Waterbury, CT · 129d · ~$9.9k all-in ($76/day) · score 5.9 Waterbury Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.6 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.3 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.6 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Witches Woods
Witches Woods · 140d · ~$11.3k all-in ($81/day) · score 3.7 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Witches Woods, CT

Landlording in Witches Woods, Connecticut, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.7/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Witches Woods is a city of 382 residents where 48.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 30.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,118/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Witches Woods eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Witches Woods closes 140 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Witches Woods's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Witches Woods runs $5,386 to $17,183 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 140 days of typical timeline and $1,118/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1/10 in Witches Woods, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Connecticut, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Witches Woods: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Connecticut's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $17,183 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Witches Woods

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
For state-level context, see the Connecticut overview link in the guides section below. The score combines political climate, rent-to-income ratio, court bias, and tenant organizing strength under C.G.S. 47a + Fair Rent.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 1,232 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.80× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 16,835 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 98,107.

  • 1,232Past month
  • 16,835Past 12 months
  • 0.80×vs baseline (past mo)
Notice requirement: at least three days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: $175 filing fee.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)
Filings dropped 7% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Witches Woods for no reason?

No, not exactly "no reason." You can terminate a tenancy without cause (meaning, not due to a lease violation) by giving a 30-day notice, provided your lease allows for it and it's not a fixed-term lease that hasn't expired. However, you can't just kick someone out mid-lease without a breach.

Q2

How much notice do I need to give a tenant to pay rent in Witches Woods?

For non-payment of rent in Witches Woods, you must provide a 3-day pay-or-quit notice. This is a strict statutory requirement under Connecticut law.

Q3

What if my tenant claims their income source is protected?

Connecticut has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot discriminate against tenants based on lawful income sources, including housing vouchers like Section 8. If they qualify based on your other screening criteria, you must accept their application regardless of their income source.

Q4

Can I keep the security deposit for normal wear and tear?

No. You can only deduct from a security deposit for actual damages beyond normal wear and tear, unpaid rent, or utility bills. You must provide an itemized list of deductions within 30 days of the tenant vacating.

Q5

Should I use an attorney for an eviction in Witches Woods?

Given the complexity of Connecticut's eviction process, the potential for costly delays from errors, and the moderate housing-court-bias score, it is highly recommended that everyday landlords use an attorney for evictions in Witches Woods. It will likely save you time and money in the long run.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.7/10 places Witches Woods in the 16th percentile of Connecticut cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.