Auburndale Eviction Risk: Lower

The voucher gap is 42.0%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. The severe-burden share is 30%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. What pushes it up most is supply constraint at 9.2/10.

Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.4/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.6/10.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 52 filings here across 15 tracked years. The worst year on record was 2007, when 9.3% of renter households were served.

In a typical year about 5.5% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 29% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. At 18% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.

CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.9/10. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.