Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #46,312 of 84,120 nationally

Hunters Glen Eviction Risk: Lower , Pine Lake

Tract 13089021910 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 7,857 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Landlord eviction risk in census tract 13089021910 (Hunters Glen in Pine Lake, Georgia) comes in at 6.7/10, the Elevated tier. That is riskier than about 91% of US census tracts.

73% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a severe level, and 23% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,544 a month while the average household earns $72,313 a year, roughly 26% of income at the averages. About 32% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
3.7
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 9% Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units2,349
Renter share32.2%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate12.1%
Median income$72,313

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Hunters Glen
Low
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#6 of 18 tracts In Pine Lake
Elevated
Within county
57 th percentile
Rank, 57th percentileLowHigh
#87 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Elevated
Within state
52 th percentile
Rank, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#1,353 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Moderate
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pine Lake and the region

Centroid at 33.8204, -84.2038 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hunters Glen scores 3.7

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
12.1% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$1,544 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pine Lake
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pine Lake
7.3

How Hunters Glen compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hunters Glen risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 3.73.7This tracttract 021910Pine Lake: 2.72.7Pine Lakeparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,902Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 49.90%Avg annual filing rate
  • 76.9%Peak (2012)
  • 307Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 130890219102004: 248 filings (16.97/100 renter HHs)2007: 336 filings (27.96/100 renter HHs)2011: 471 filings (76.09/100 renter HHs)2012: 476 filings (76.90/100 renter HHs)2013: 306 filings (49.43/100 renter HHs)2014: 405 filings (65.43/100 renter HHs)2015: 353 filings (57.03/100 renter HHs)2016: 307 filings (29.38/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 24% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,299Total filings 2020-21
  • 17.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 40 filings (400.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 13 filings (130.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 61 filings (610.00× baseline)2021-11-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 14 filings (140.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 10 filings (100.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 34 filings (340.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2022-09-01: 65 filings (650.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2022-11-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 35 filings (350.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 11 filings (110.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 12 filings (120.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 45 filings (450.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 36 filings (360.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 4 filings (40.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2024-08-01: 25 filings (250.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 18 filings (180.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 19 filings (190.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 8 filings (80.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 20 filings (200.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 23 filings (230.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 15 filings (150.00× baseline)2025-11-01: 22 filings (220.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 28 filings (280.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 29 filings (290.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 16 filings (160.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hunters Glen. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hunters Glen

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 8.7/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Pine Lake, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the DeKalb County average of 6.4 and above the Georgia statewide average of 5.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly Black and ranks around the 86th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 2,902 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 49.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 76.9% of renter households in 2012.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021910

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021910?

Census tract 13089021910 in the Hunters Glen neighborhood scores 3.7/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021910?

Median gross rent is $1,544/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 73% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021910?

12.1% of residents in tract 13089021910 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,857.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021910?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 69th, minority 90th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021910 considered part of Hunters Glen?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021910 fall within Hunters Glen (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021910?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,902 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021910 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 49.90% of renter households, peaking at 76.9% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089021910 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089021910 compare to Pine Lake overall?

Tract 13089021910 scores 3.7/10, higher than the parent city of Pine Lake at 2.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pine Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pine Lake

Top eight tracts in Pine Lake ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related