Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #41,206 of 84,120 nationally

Hunters Glen Eviction Risk: Moderate , Pine Lake

Tract 13089021910 · DeKalb County, GA · pop 7,857 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Tract 13089021910 sits in the Hunters Glen area of Tucker eviction risk, GA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.5/10. It is home to 7,857 residents. Against DeKalb County at 52.2%, 73% of renters here are cost-burdened.

Risk score
4.5
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 23% Stable renters 9% Owners 68%
Tract context
Occupied units2,349
Renter share32.2%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate12.1%
Median income$72,313

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Hunters Glen
Low
Within parent city
71 th percentile
Rank, 71st percentileLowHigh
#6 of 18 tracts In Pine Lake
Elevated
Within county
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#95 of 203 tracts In DeKalb County
Moderate
Within state
64 th percentile
Rank, 64th percentileLowHigh
#1,017 of 2,791 tracts In Georgia
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Pine Lake and the region

Centroid at 33.8204, -84.2038 · click any tract to drill in

Why Hunters Glen scores 4.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.4
State political climate
Georgia legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
12.1% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$1,544 rent vs county FMR
3.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Pine Lake
8.7
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.4
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Pine Lake
7.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Pine Lake
7.3

How Hunters Glen compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Hunters Glen risk score vs. parent city / county / state4.5This tracttract 0219104.0Pine Lakeparent city4.5Countyavg tract in county4.2Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 86

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 2,902Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 49.90%Avg annual filing rate
  • 76.9%Peak (2012)
  • 307Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2004 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 13089021910
Filings climbed 24% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 1,299Total filings 2020-21
  • 17.1Avg monthly (observed)
  • 0.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 0.00×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline

Pandemic filings ran far below baseline (moratorium effect). Eviction Lab tracked Atlanta, GA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Hunters Glen. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Hunters Glen

The dominant input is court filing pressure at 9.7/10. On the high side, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.7/10.

Severe burden reaches 23%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.4/10. The filing record is not thin: 2,902 evictions over 8 years of observation.

The worst year on record was 2012, when 76.9% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 49.9% of renter households face a filing.

On the national scale it lands near the 51st percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 8.7/10. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the most pressured.

It tracks the DeKalb County average of 4.5 closely. Average gross rent is $1,544, close to the Tucker average.

These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.

Frequently asked

About tract 13089021910

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 13089021910?

Census tract 13089021910 in the Hunters Glen neighborhood scores 4.5/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 13089021910?

Median gross rent is $1,544/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 73% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 13089021910?

12.1% of residents in tract 13089021910 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 7,857.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 13089021910?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 87th, household 69th, minority 90th, housing 69th.
Q5

Is tract 13089021910 considered part of Hunters Glen?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 13089021910 fall within Hunters Glen (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 13089021910?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 2,902 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 13089021910 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 49.90% of renter households, peaking at 76.9% in 2012. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 13089021910 struggle to pay rent?

About 18.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 11.8% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 13089021910 compare to Pine Lake overall?

Tract 13089021910 scores 4.5/10, higher than the parent city of Pine Lake at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Pine Lake; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Pine Lake

Top eight tracts in Pine Lake ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related