Skip to content
Neighborhood · Douglasville, GA

Rolling Hills Eviction Risk: Lower

1 census tracts · pop 2,639 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.8/10 · range 3.8–3.8

Rolling Hills maps to a single census tract in Douglasville, GA and houses 2,639 people. It carries an Eviction Risk Score of 3.8/10, in the Lower tier. Against a Douglasville baseline of 30.7%, 17% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.

The dominant input is tenant-organizing strength at 9.2/10. On the softer side is economic stress, at 1/10.

Running cool is supply constraint, at 1.9/10. Average gross rent is $1,254, 21% below the Douglasville average of $1,582. Among the 12 mapped neighborhoods of Douglasville, it ranks #10 by risk, the lower third.

At 27% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out. For a like-for-like read, Tributary and Westwood Heights score within a fraction of it.

Against average income of $84,821, annual rent is only 18%, a wide affordability cushion. Poverty sits at 3%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

One tract means one number: 3.8/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
3.8
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Rolling Hills vs Douglasville How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
16.8% -45%
Douglasville: 30.7%
Average gross rent
$1,254 -21%
Douglasville: $1,582
Average HH income
$84,821 +11%
Douglasville: $76,591
Poverty rate
3.3% -71%
Douglasville: 11.2%
Renter share
26.8% -48%
Douglasville: 51.7%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Rolling Hills and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3.8–3.8

Why Rolling Hills scores 3.8

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.0–2.0 across tracts
2.0
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 6.3–6.3 across tracts
6.3
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 6.6–6.6 across tracts
6.6
Rent control risk
17% of income on rent · Range 6.2–6.2 across tracts
6.2
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 2.1–2.1 across tracts
2.1
Tenant organizing strength
27% renter households · Range 9.2–9.2 across tracts
9.2
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 5.9–5.9 across tracts
5.9
Economic stress
3.3% below poverty line · Range 1.0–1.0 across tracts
1.0
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 1.9–1.9 across tracts
1.9
Risk score comparison

Rolling Hills vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Rolling Hills score vs. parent city, state, U.S.3.8Rolling HillsNeighborhood4.5Parent cityhost city4.1Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Rolling Hills

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
13097080608 3.8 2,639 17% $1,254
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 33

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 32%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 64%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 70%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 14%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Rolling Hills

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Rolling Hills

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Rolling Hills?

Rolling Hills scores 3.8/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Rolling Hills compare to Douglasville overall?

Rolling Hills scores 0.7 points lower than Douglasville overall (4.5/10). Renters spend 17% of income on rent vs 31% citywide. Average rent: $1,254 vs $1,582.
Q3

What is the average rent in Rolling Hills?

Average gross rent in Rolling Hills is $1,254/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 17% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Rolling Hills residents are renters?

27% of Rolling Hills households are renter-occupied (vs 52% in Douglasville). The neighborhood has 2,639 residents.
Q5

Is Rolling Hills a high social-vulnerability area?

Rolling Hills sits in the 33rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Rolling Hills for landlords?

Rolling Hills carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.8/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Douglasville as a whole (4.5/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Rolling Hills?

Rolling Hills has 3,088 residents. Top groups: Black (non-Hispanic) (62.3%), White (non-Hispanic) (28.6%), Hispanic / Latino (5.8%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Douglasville

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Rolling Hills.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further