2 census tracts · pop 7,438 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.9/10
· range 3.3–4.2
South Oaks takes in 2 census tracts of Warner Robins, GA, population 7,438. That produces an Eviction Risk Score of 3.9/10, Lower tier. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure, at 1/10.
Average gross rent is $1,609, 33% above the Warner Robins average of $1,212. Running cool is tenant-organizing strength, at 1.5/10.
Severe burden reaches 21%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears. The voucher gap is 23.6%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears. Well under the midpoint is eviction-process difficulty, at 2/10.
34% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, above the Warner Robins rate of 29.5%. That places it #8 of 18 neighborhoods in Warner Robins.
For a like-for-like read, Sonja Heights and Wrights Mill score within a fraction of it. The 2 tracts here are tightly clustered, 0.9 points apart at the extremes. Annual rent works out to 24% of average household income of $79,911.
29% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
The area figure travels well to individual addresses here, though the per-tract table below still carries the detail. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.
Risk score
3.9
Lower
2 tracts · population-weighted
South Oaks vs Warner RobinsHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority58%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport7%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in South Oaks
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
11.9%Housing insecurity
7.8%Utility shutoff threat
13.2%Food insecurity
10.1%SNAP enrollment
9.6%No health insurance
29.7%Any disability
Frequently asked
About South Oaks
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for South Oaks?
South Oaks scores 3.9/10 (Lower tier) across 2 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does South Oaks compare to Warner Robins overall?
South Oaks scores 0.5 points higher than Warner Robins overall (3.4/10). Renters spend 34% of income on rent vs 30% citywide. Average rent: $1,609 vs $1,212.
Q3
What is the average rent in South Oaks?
Average gross rent in South Oaks is $1,609/month (pop-weighted across 2 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 34% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of South Oaks residents are renters?
29% of South Oaks households are renter-occupied (vs 47% in Warner Robins). The neighborhood has 7,438 residents.
Q5
Is South Oaks a high social-vulnerability area?
South Oaks sits in the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
Which tracts in South Oaks have the highest eviction risk?
The highest-risk constituent tract in South Oaks is census tract 13153021120 (score 4.2/10). Across the 2 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 3.3 to 4.2, a spread of 0.9 points.
Q7
How safe is South Oaks for landlords?
South Oaks carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3.9/10). Pop-weighted across 2 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Warner Robins as a whole (3.4/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q8
What is the demographic breakdown of South Oaks?
South Oaks has 8,040 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (57.8%), Black (non-Hispanic) (25.1%), Hispanic / Latino (8.8%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
