Skip to content
Neighborhood · Rockford, IL

Jackson Oaks Eviction Risk: Moderate

3 census tracts · pop 7,646 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 5.9/10 · range 5.5–6.3

Jackson Oaks is a white-hispanic neighborhood in Rockford with 3 census tracts and a population of 7,646 residents. The neighborhood's pop-weighted eviction-risk score of 5.9/10 (Moderate tier) blends state law, county-level filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty. 48% of renters here pay at least 30% of household income on rent, and 32% are severely cost-burdened (≥50% of income). Average gross rent of $827/month sits 16% lower than the Rockford citywide average ($985).

Risk score
5.9
Moderate
3 tracts · population-weighted
Jackson Oaks vs Rockford How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
48.3% +50%
Rockford: 32.1%
Average gross rent
$827 -16%
Rockford: $985
Average HH income
$33,807 -37%
Rockford: $53,328
Poverty rate
43.1% +97%
Rockford: 21.9%
Renter share
68.4% +52%
Rockford: 45.1%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Jackson Oaks and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 3 tracts span score 5.5–6.3

Why Jackson Oaks scores 5.9

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 5.2–5.2 across tracts
5.2
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 5.1–5.1 across tracts
5.1
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 4.5–4.5 across tracts
4.5
Rent control risk
48% of income on rent · Range 2.0–2.0 across tracts
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Tenant organizing strength
68% renter households · Range 3.0–3.0 across tracts
3.0
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Economic stress
43.1% below poverty line · Range 6.1–10.0 across tracts
8.6
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 1.1–2.8 across tracts
2.0
Risk score comparison

Jackson Oaks vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Jackson Oaks score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Jackson Oaks: 5.95.9Jackson OaksNeighborhoodParent city: 4.24.2Parent cityhost cityState: 4.74.7Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Variance across tracts

How uniformly does eviction risk play out in Jackson Oaks?

Left: distribution of constituent tract scores. Right: every tract as a heat square. Click any square to drill in.

Score distribution
0246810
Spread of 0.8 points from 5.5 to 6.3. Tracts are relatively uniform, so conditions feel similar throughout the neighborhood.
Tracts as heat grid
Each square = one census tract. Color tracks the same green→red ramp as the chloropleth map above.
Census tracts

3 tracts in Jackson Oaks

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
17201001200 6.3 2,744 54% $822
17201001300 6 2,183 51% $724
17201000800 5.5 2,719 41% $916
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 91

Pop-weighted across 3 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 94%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 94%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 72%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 62%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Jackson Oaks

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Jackson Oaks

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Jackson Oaks?

Jackson Oaks scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier) across 3 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Jackson Oaks compare to Rockford overall?

Jackson Oaks scores 1.7 points higher than Rockford overall (4.2/10). Renters spend 48% of income on rent vs 32% citywide. Average rent: $827 vs $985.
Q3

What is the average rent in Jackson Oaks?

Average gross rent in Jackson Oaks is $827/month (pop-weighted across 3 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 48% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Jackson Oaks residents are renters?

68% of Jackson Oaks households are renter-occupied (vs 45% in Rockford). The neighborhood has 7,646 residents.
Q5

Is Jackson Oaks a high social-vulnerability area?

Jackson Oaks sits in the 91st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

Which tracts in Jackson Oaks have the highest eviction risk?

The highest-risk constituent tract in Jackson Oaks is census tract 17201001200 (score 6.3/10). Across the 3 tracts in this neighborhood the score ranges from 5.5 to 6.3, a spread of 0.8 points.
Q7

How safe is Jackson Oaks for landlords?

Jackson Oaks carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (5.9/10). Pop-weighted across 3 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Rockford as a whole (4.2/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q8

What is the demographic breakdown of Jackson Oaks?

Jackson Oaks has 7,455 residents (White-Hispanic Neighborhood). Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (37.1%), Hispanic / Latino (29.2%), Black (non-Hispanic) (24.2%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Jackson Oaks

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Rockford

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Jackson Oaks.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further