Crescent Lakes Eviction Risk: Lower , Andover
Tract 20015020207 · Butler County, KS · pop 4,409 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Tract 20015020207 sits in the Crescent Lakes area of Andover eviction risk, KS, carrying an eviction-risk score of 3/10. It is home to 4,409 residents. Against Butler County at 37.4%, 19% of renters here are cost-burdened.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Andover and the region
Centroid at 37.7101, -97.1439 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crescent Lakes scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Crescent Lakes compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 6
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 11%Socioeconomic
- 15%Household composition
- 24%Racial/ethnic minority
- 11%Housing & transportation
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Crescent Lakes. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.5%Housing insecurity
- 6.1%Utility-shutoff threat
- 8.6%Food insecurity
- 4.4%SNAP enrollment
- 5.2%Transit barriers
- 6.5%No health insurance
- 15.2%Frequent mental distress
- 25.3%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Crescent Lakes
The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 10/10. The voucher gap is 73.3%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears. On the softer side, economic stress reads 1/10.
Severe burden reaches 19%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.7/10.
SNAP participation runs 4.4% against 15.2% nationally. Average gross rent is $1,724, 19% above the Andover average.
Food insecurity runs 8.6% against 17.8% nationally. It sits 0.7 points below the Butler County average of 3.7.
That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin; price a renewal off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 1.6/10. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the least pressured.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 20015020207
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20015020207?
What is the average rent in tract 20015020207?
What is the poverty rate in tract 20015020207?
How socially vulnerable is tract 20015020207?
Is tract 20015020207 considered part of Crescent Lakes?
What share of households in tract 20015020207 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 20015020207 compare to Andover overall?
Highest-risk tracts in Andover
Top eight tracts in Andover ranked by composite eviction-risk score.