Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #71,178 of 84,120 nationally

Crescent Lakes Eviction Risk: Lower , Andover

Tract 20015020206 · Butler County, KS · pop 4,772 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi

Tract 20015020206 covers the Crescent Lakes area of Andover in Kansas. Home to 4,772 residents, it scores 3.9/10 on landlord eviction risk. On the national scale it ranks #75,237 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 24% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a moderate level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,423 a month against an average household income of $89,740 a year, roughly 19% of income at the averages. About 28% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7% Stable renters 21% Owners 72%
Tract context
Occupied units1,720
Renter share28.3%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate6.5%
Median income$89,740

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Crescent Lakes
Very High
Within parent city
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 5 tracts In Andover
Very High
Within county
39 th percentile
Rank, 39th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 19 tracts In Butler County
Low
Within state
20 th percentile
Rank, 20th percentileLowHigh
#667 of 829 tracts In Kansas
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Andover and the region

Centroid at 37.6829, -97.1298 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crescent Lakes scores 2.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Andover
3.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.9
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
6.5% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,423 rent vs county FMR
9.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Andover
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Andover
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Andover
3.5

How Crescent Lakes compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crescent Lakes risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.22.2This tracttract 020206Andover: 1.91.9Andoverparent cityCounty: 2.92.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 31

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Crescent Lakes. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crescent Lakes

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.3/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Andover eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Butler County average of 4.3 and below the Kansas statewide average of 4.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.2% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.7% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 31st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, this is among the easier places to operate: faster process, lighter tenant-protection overhead, and shorter typical cases.

Frequently asked

About tract 20015020206

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20015020206?

Census tract 20015020206 in the Crescent Lakes neighborhood scores 2.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 20015020206?

Median gross rent is $1,423/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 24% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 20015020206?

6.5% of residents in tract 20015020206 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,772.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 20015020206?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 5th, household 67th, minority 41th, housing 59th.
Q5

Is tract 20015020206 considered part of Crescent Lakes?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 20015020206 fall within Crescent Lakes (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 20015020206 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.7% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 20015020206 compare to Andover overall?

Tract 20015020206 scores 2.2/10, higher than the parent city of Andover at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Andover eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Andover

Top eight tracts in Andover ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related