Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Crescent Lakes Eviction Risk: Lower , Andover

Tract 20015020208 · Butler County, KS · pop 3,296 · neighborhood within 1.4 mi

Here is how census tract 20015020208, in Crescent Lakes in Andover eviction risk, looks to a landlord: a 4.2/10 eviction-risk score (Moderate tier) across a population of 3,296. It lands near the 16th percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

38% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a high level, and 12% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average rent runs $1,453 a month against an average household income of $151,976 a year, roughly 11% of income at the averages. Renters make up 11% of occupied homes.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 4% Stable renters 7% Owners 89%
Tract context
Occupied units981
Renter share11.2%
SVI overall0.10
Poverty rate0.5%
Median income$151,976

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 3 tracts In Crescent Lakes
Very Low
Within parent city
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#5 of 5 tracts In Andover
Very Low
Within county
0 th percentile
Rank, 0th percentileLowHigh
#19 of 19 tracts In Butler County
Very Low
Within state
5 th percentile
Rank, 5th percentileLowHigh
#789 of 829 tracts In Kansas
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Andover and the region

Centroid at 37.7186, -97.1294 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crescent Lakes scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Andover
3.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
2.9
State political climate
Kansas legislature & governorship
2.0
Economic stress
0.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$1,453 rent vs county FMR
9.6
Rent control risk
Inherited from Andover
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Andover
4.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Andover
3.5

How Crescent Lakes compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crescent Lakes risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 020208Andover: 1.91.9Andoverparent cityCounty: 2.92.9Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 10

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Crescent Lakes. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crescent Lakes

The heaviest input here is supply constraint at 9.6/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Andover eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Butler County average of 4.3 and in line with the Kansas statewide average of 4.2. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 7.0% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.9% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 10th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 20015020208

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 20015020208?

Census tract 20015020208 in the Crescent Lakes neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 20015020208?

Median gross rent is $1,453/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 38% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 20015020208?

0.5% of residents in tract 20015020208 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,296.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 20015020208?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 10th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 9th, household 7th, minority 32th, housing 32th.
Q5

Is tract 20015020208 considered part of Crescent Lakes?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 20015020208 fall within Crescent Lakes (neighborhood centroid within 1.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 20015020208 struggle to pay rent?

About 7.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.9% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 20015020208 compare to Andover overall?

Tract 20015020208 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Andover at 1.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Andover eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Andover

Top eight tracts in Andover ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related