Skip to content
Worthington, Kentucky eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,759 residents

Worthington, KY Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Greenup County · Population 1,759

In 2026
Risk score
2
VERY LOW

18th percentile, Kentucky.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.0 Average2.6 Now2
3.3 2.0 1976 · score 3.0 1977 · score 3.0 1978 · score 3.0 1979 · score 3.0 1980 · score 3.1 1981 · score 3.1 1982 · score 3.1 1983 · score 3.0 1984 · score 2.6 1985 · score 2.5 1986 · score 2.4 1987 · score 2.3 1988 · score 2.2 1989 · score 2.1 1990 · score 2.1 1991 · score 2.2 1992 · score 2.7 1993 · score 2.8 1994 · score 2.8 1995 · score 2.8 1996 · score 2.8 1997 · score 2.8 1998 · score 2.7 1999 · score 2.8 2000 · score 2.7 2001 · score 2.7 2002 · score 2.7 2003 · score 2.6 2004 · score 2.5 2005 · score 2.4 2006 · score 2.4 2007 · score 2.3 2008 · score 2.5 2009 · score 2.7 2010 · score 2.7 2011 · score 2.7 2012 · score 2.5 2013 · score 2.4 2014 · score 2.3 2015 · score 2.2 2016 · score 2.2 2017 · score 2.1 2018 · score 2.0 2019 · score 2.0 2020 · score 3.1 2021 · score 3.3 2022 · score 2.5 2023 · score 2.2 2024 · score 2.1 2025 · score 2.0 2026 · score 2.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.0 Regional 4.0 State 2.1 Economic 5.4 Supply 5.7 Rent Control 1.9 Eviction 1.6 Tenant 6.8 Housing 4.1 2 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +50.5% (2024)
    4.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.0
  3. State political climate
    Kentucky legislature & governorship
    2.1
  4. Economic stress
    13.1% poverty · 2.7% unemp.
    5.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $871 average · 31.3% renters
    5.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    17.9% of income on rent
    1.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    34 days filing → judgment
    1.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    31.3% renters
    6.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Worthington and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Worthington compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Greenup County
Very Low
#6 of 6 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 cities in Greenup County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Kentucky
Very Low
#490 of 553 cities
Rank in state, 11th percentileLowHigh
#490 of 553 cities in Kentucky for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Worthington risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Worthington: 2.02.0WorthingtonThis cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg in countyState: 2.52.5Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend-1.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 34d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $871/mo. A contested eviction takes 34 days and costs $1,043–$3,037 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 31.3%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,759 residents, 31.3% rent. 18% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 13.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4 and 4 (GOP margin +50.5% (2024)). State climate at 2.1, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.1
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.1/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.6, housing court bias 4.1, rent-control risk 1.9. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.4. Supply constraint: 5.7. The numbers behind those: 13.1% poverty, 2.7% unemployment, 18% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Worthington sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Louisville, KY · 34d · ~$2.1k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.4 Louisville Lexington-Fayette urban county, KY · 32d · ~$2.1k all-in ($66/day) · score 2.4 Lexington-Fayette urban county Louisville, KY · 32d · ~$2.1k all-in ($64/day) · score 3.2 Louisville Bowling Green, KY · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($63/day) · score 2.4 Bowling Green Owensboro, KY · 35d · ~$2.2k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.3 Owensboro Columbus, OH · 38d · ~$2.7k all-in ($72/day) · score 3.1 Columbus Cincinnati, OH · 37d · ~$2.8k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.4 Cincinnati Dayton, OH · 38d · ~$2.6k all-in ($67/day) · score 3.4 Dayton Hamilton, OH · 45d · ~$2.9k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.8 Hamilton Springfield, OH · 42d · ~$2.4k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.8 Springfield Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Worthington
Worthington · 34d · ~$2.0k all-in ($60/day) · score 2 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Worthington, KY

Landlording in Worthington, Kentucky, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Worthington is a city of 1,759 residents where 31.3% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 17.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $871/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Worthington eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Worthington closes 34 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Worthington's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Worthington runs $1,043 to $3,037 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 34 days of typical timeline and $871/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.8/10 in Worthington, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Kentucky, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Worthington: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Kentucky's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,037 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Worthington

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Cost-versus-timeline trade-off: at 34 days and roughly $3,037 on the high end, cash-for-keys at $1,214 to $1,822 typically beats the legal route for non-aggravated cases. Default judgment frequency is high under KRS 383 URLTA opt-in.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in Worthington?

No, you can't evict for "any reason." You must have a legal cause, such as non-payment of rent, lease violations, or the expiration of a lease term. While Kentucky doesn't have statewide just-cause requirements, you still need to follow the proper notice periods and court procedures.
Q2

How quickly can I get a tenant out who isn't paying rent?

The fastest you can typically get a non-paying tenant out in Worthington is around 34 days, starting from the day you issue your 7-day notice. This assumes no delays and a quick court process. Realistically, it can take longer if the tenant contests the eviction.
Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Worthington?

While you are not legally required to have a lawyer, it is highly recommended. Landlord-tenant law has specific procedural requirements, and mistakes can cause significant delays and added costs. An attorney specializing in evictions can ensure you follow the process correctly and efficiently.
Q4

What if the tenant damages my property during the eviction process?

Document all damages with photos and videos. You can deduct the cost of repairs from the security deposit, provided you follow Kentucky's security deposit rules, including providing an itemized list within 60 days. If damages exceed the deposit, you may need to pursue a separate claim in small claims court.
Q5

Can I turn off utilities to force a tenant to leave?

Absolutely not. This is an illegal "self-help" eviction and can result in significant penalties and legal trouble for you. Always follow the legal eviction process through the courts. For more information on what you cannot do, review Kentucky tenant protections.
Q6

What is the most common mistake landlords make in Worthington evictions?

The most common mistake is improper or delayed notice. Serving the wrong type of notice, failing to serve it correctly, or waiting too long to act after a tenant breaches the lease can all lead to your case being dismissed, forcing you to start over and losing more rent.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2/10 places Worthington in the 18th percentile of Kentucky cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.