Skip to content
Neighborhood · Forest Glen, MD

Chestnut Hills Eviction Risk: Moderate

1 census tracts · pop 3,410 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 5.4/10 · range 5.4–5.4

Chestnut Hills is a one-tract neighborhood of Forest Glen, MD and houses 3,410 people. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.4/10, in the Moderate tier. Severe burden reaches 46%. A tenant at that level absorbs no shock: one cut shift or one repair bill converts directly into arrears.

63% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, dramatically above the Forest Glen rate of 28.1%. The clearest offset is economic stress, at 1.2/10. At $1,969 a month, rents sit 24% over what the rest of Forest Glen commands.

Running hot is tenant-organizing strength at 7.7/10. SNAP participation is 6.0% of households versus 15.2% nationally.

Food insecurity affects 9.1% of adults, 8.7 points below the national rate. At 11% renter-occupied, this is predominantly owner territory, and rental comps have to be drawn from further out. Rent takes 13% of average household income, comfortably inside the 30% line and unusually low for a rental sub-market.

Poverty sits at 5%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.

Because the boundary contains one tract, 5.4/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Chestnut Hills vs Forest Glen How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
62.9% +124%
Forest Glen: 28.1%
Average gross rent
$1,969 +24%
Forest Glen: $1,582
Average HH income
$180,417 +42%
Forest Glen: $127,196
Poverty rate
4.7% -31%
Forest Glen: 6.9%
Renter share
10.6% -69%
Forest Glen: 33.7%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Chestnut Hills and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 5.4–5.4

Why Chestnut Hills scores 5.4

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 5.7–5.7 across tracts
5.7
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 8.0–8.0 across tracts
8.0
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 8.2–8.2 across tracts
8.2
Rent control risk
63% of income on rent · Range 5.1–5.1 across tracts
5.1
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 5.5–5.5 across tracts
5.5
Tenant organizing strength
11% renter households · Range 7.7–7.7 across tracts
7.7
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 4.5–4.5 across tracts
4.5
Economic stress
4.7% below poverty line · Range 1.2–1.2 across tracts
1.2
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 3.5–3.5 across tracts
3.5
Risk score comparison

Chestnut Hills vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Chestnut Hills score vs. parent city, state, U.S.5.4Chestnut HillsNeighborhood6.1Parent cityhost city5.5Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Chestnut Hills

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
24031703901 5.4 3,410 63% $1,969
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 26

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 24%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 26%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 62%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 29%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Chestnut Hills

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Chestnut Hills

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Chestnut Hills?

Chestnut Hills scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Chestnut Hills compare to Forest Glen overall?

Chestnut Hills scores 0.7 points lower than Forest Glen overall (6.1/10). Renters spend 63% of income on rent vs 28% citywide. Average rent: $1,969 vs $1,582.
Q3

What is the average rent in Chestnut Hills?

Average gross rent in Chestnut Hills is $1,969/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 63% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Chestnut Hills residents are renters?

11% of Chestnut Hills households are renter-occupied (vs 34% in Forest Glen). The neighborhood has 3,410 residents.
Q5

Is Chestnut Hills a high social-vulnerability area?

Chestnut Hills sits in the 26th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (less vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Chestnut Hills for landlords?

Chestnut Hills carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (5.4/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Forest Glen as a whole (6.1/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Chestnut Hills?

Chestnut Hills has 3,182 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (57.5%), Hispanic / Latino (19%), Black (non-Hispanic) (10.3%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Chestnut Hills

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Forest Glen

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Chestnut Hills.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further