Neighborhood · Ranked #59,654 of 84,120 nationally
Fort Foote Village Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Washington
Tract 24033801410 ·
Prince George's County, MD · pop 3,623 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
Census tract 24033801410 covers part of the Fort Foote Village area of Fort Washington, MD, and scores 3.4/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 3,623 residents. 51% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
3.4
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%Stable renters 6%Owners 86%
Tract context
Occupied units1,282
Renter share13.6%
SVI overall0.41
Poverty rate7.3%
Median income$154,000
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Fort Foote Village
Moderate
Within parent city
67th percentile
#3 of 7 tracts In Fort Washington
Elevated
Within county
25th percentile
#160 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Low
Within state
13th percentile
#1,281 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Fort Washington and the region
Centroid at 38.7564, -77.0238 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fort Foote Village scores 3.4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Washington
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
7.3% poverty · this tract
1.8
Supply constraint
$2,620 rent vs county FMR
6.3
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Washington
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Washington
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Washington
5.2
How Fort Foote Village compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 41
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
55%Socioeconomic
63%Household composition
92%Racial/ethnic minority
6%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
9Total filings over 4 yrs
4.15%Avg annual filing rate
9.8%Peak (2014)
1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year2011 to 2016
Filings dropped 50% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
16.2%Housing insecurity
9.6%Utility-shutoff threat
18.8%Food insecurity
12.6%SNAP enrollment
8.6%Transit barriers
10.7%No health insurance
12.6%Frequent mental distress
27.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fort Foote Village
The dominant input is court filing pressure at 10/10. Running hot, local political climate reads 9.1/10. Cost burden runs 57% here against 45.6% across Prince George's County.
On the high side, regional political climate reads 9/10. It sits 1.5 points below the Prince George's County average of 4.9.
Court records carry 9 eviction filings across 4 observed years. The voucher gap is 13.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
The worst year on record was 2014, when 9.8% of renter households were served. In a typical year about 4.2% of renter households face a filing. Nationally it ranks #59,654 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
At 14% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 24033801410
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033801410?
Census tract 24033801410 in the Fort Foote Village neighborhood scores 3.4/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 24033801410?
Median gross rent is $2,620/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 57% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 24033801410?
7.3% of residents in tract 24033801410 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,623.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 24033801410?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 41th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 55th, household 63th, minority 92th, housing 6th.
Q5
Is tract 24033801410 considered part of Fort Foote Village?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033801410 fall within Fort Foote Village (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033801410?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 9 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033801410 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.15% of renter households, peaking at 9.8% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 24033801410 struggle to pay rent?
About 16.2% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 9.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 24033801410 compare to Fort Washington overall?
Tract 24033801410 scores 3.4/10, lower than the parent city of Fort Washington at 4.6/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Fort Washington
Top eight tracts in Fort Washington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.