Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #81,634 of 84,120 nationally

Tantallon Square Eviction Risk: Lower , Fort Washington

Tract 24033801307 · Prince George's County, MD · pop 3,820 · neighborhood within 0.4 mi

Eviction risk in Tantallon Square in Fort Washington centers on tract 24033801307, which scores $1/10 (Elevated tier) and is home to 3,820 residents. That is riskier than about 95% of US census tracts.

About 62% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 15% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $2,667 monthly, set against $161,641 in average yearly household income, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 14% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 5% Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,321
Renter share13.8%
SVI overall0.26
Poverty rate3.5%
Median income$161,641

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Tantallon Square
Moderate
Within parent city
17 th percentile
Rank, 17th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 7 tracts In Fort Washington
Very Low
Within county
7 th percentile
Rank, 7th percentileLowHigh
#200 of 214 tracts In Prince George's County
Very Low
Within state
11 th percentile
Rank, 11th percentileLowHigh
#1,304 of 1,464 tracts In Maryland
Very Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Fort Washington and the region

Centroid at 38.7319, -77.0087 · click any tract to drill in

Why Tantallon Square scores 1.2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Fort Washington
9.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
9.0
State political climate
Maryland legislature & governorship
5.7
Economic stress
3.5% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
$2,667 rent vs county FMR
6.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Fort Washington
7.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
5.3
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Fort Washington
2.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Fort Washington
5.2

How Tantallon Square compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Tantallon Square risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.21.2This tracttract 801307Fort Washington: 6.46.4Fort Washingtonparent cityCounty: 3.53.5Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.63.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 26

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 28Total filings over 4 yrs
  • 4.91%Avg annual filing rate
  • 9.3%Peak (2014)
  • 10Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2011 to 2016
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 240338013072011: 2 filings (1.24/100 renter HHs)2012: 1 filings (0.62/100 renter HHs)2014: 15 filings (9.32/100 renter HHs)2016: 10 filings (8.47/100 renter HHs)
Filings climbed 400% over the past 4 months.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Tantallon Square

The heaviest input here is rent-control risk at 7.2/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Prince George's County average of 6.9 and above the Maryland statewide average of 6.6. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 12.5% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 7.4% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 28 eviction filings here over 4 tracked years, with about 4.9% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 9.3% of renter households in 2014.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 24033801307

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 24033801307?

Census tract 24033801307 in the Tantallon Square neighborhood scores 1.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 24033801307?

Median gross rent is $2,667/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 62% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 24033801307?

3.5% of residents in tract 24033801307 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,820.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 24033801307?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 26th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 12th, household 63th, minority 86th, housing 19th.
Q5

Is tract 24033801307 considered part of Tantallon Square?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 24033801307 fall within Tantallon Square (neighborhood centroid within 0.4 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 24033801307?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 28 eviction filings across 4 validated years in tract 24033801307 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 4.91% of renter households, peaking at 9.3% in 2014. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 24033801307 struggle to pay rent?

About 12.5% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.4% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 24033801307 compare to Fort Washington overall?

Tract 24033801307 scores 1.2/10, lower than the parent city of Fort Washington at 6.4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Fort Washington eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Fort Washington

Top eight tracts in Fort Washington ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related