Fort Foote Village Eviction Risk: Lower
1 census tracts · pop 3,623 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3.4/10 · range 3.4–3.4
Fort Foote Village maps to a single census tract in Fort Washington, MD and houses 3,623 people. Scored across those inputs it reaches 3.4/10, placing it in the Lower tier. 51% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate.
57% of renters here are cost-burdened at the 30% threshold, far above the Fort Washington rate of 31.3%. The main counterweight is economic stress, at 1.8/10. Well under the midpoint is tenant-organizing strength, at 2.7/10.
Court records for this tract carry 9 eviction filings. The voucher gap is 13.2%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which shows up as churn rather than arrears.
On the high side is rent-regulation exposure at 7.2/10. Filing activity peaked in 2014 at 9.8% of renter households. The most recent observed rate, 0.9% in 2016, is well off that peak.
Among the 7 mapped neighborhoods of Fort Washington, it ranks #3 by risk, the middle third. Only 14% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin here; price renewals off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. For a like-for-like read, Friendly Hills and Riverview score within a fraction of it.
Average gross rent runs $2,620, close to the Fort Washington average. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $154,000.
One tract means one number: 3.4/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.
Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk
Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Risk heat across Fort Foote Village and the region
Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 3.4–3.4
Why Fort Foote Village scores 3.4
9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendlyFort Foote Village vs. parent city, state, U.S.
Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).
1 tracts in Fort Foote Village
Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.
| Tract↕ | Score↕ | Pop↕ | % over 30% on rent↕ | Average rent↕ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24033801410 | 3.4 | 3,623 | 57% | $2,620 |
CDC SVI percentile: 41
Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.
Court-record eviction history in Fort Foote Village
Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 9Total filings (sum)
- 4.15%Avg annual filing rate
- 9.8%Peak year (2014)
- 0.93%Latest filed (2016)
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Fort Foote Village
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
- 16.2%Housing insecurity
- 9.6%Utility shutoff threat
- 18.8%Food insecurity
- 12.6%SNAP enrollment
- 10.7%No health insurance
- 27.1%Any disability
About Fort Foote Village
How does Fort Foote Village compare to Fort Washington overall?
What is the average rent in Fort Foote Village?
What percentage of Fort Foote Village residents are renters?
Is Fort Foote Village a high social-vulnerability area?
How safe is Fort Foote Village for landlords?
What is the demographic breakdown of Fort Foote Village?
Other neighborhoods near Fort Foote Village
Other neighborhoods inside Fort Washington
Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Fort Foote Village.