Skip to content
Orange, Massachusetts eviction risk overview
City brief · 3,737 residents

Orange, MA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Franklin County · Population 3,737

In 2026
Risk score
6.3
ELEVATED

96th percentile, Massachusetts.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.5 Average4.3 Now6.3
7.4 2.5 1976 · score 3.1 1977 · score 3.0 1978 · score 3.0 1979 · score 2.9 1980 · score 3.0 1981 · score 3.0 1982 · score 3.0 1983 · score 2.8 1984 · score 2.7 1985 · score 2.6 1986 · score 2.6 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.8 1989 · score 2.9 1990 · score 3.1 1991 · score 3.3 1992 · score 3.6 1993 · score 3.6 1994 · score 3.8 1995 · score 3.5 1996 · score 4.1 1997 · score 4.2 1998 · score 4.2 1999 · score 4.3 2000 · score 4.2 2001 · score 4.3 2002 · score 4.3 2003 · score 4.3 2004 · score 4.3 2005 · score 4.3 2006 · score 4.4 2007 · score 4.5 2008 · score 4.7 2009 · score 5.0 2010 · score 5.0 2011 · score 5.0 2012 · score 4.9 2013 · score 5.0 2014 · score 5.0 2015 · score 5.0 2016 · score 5.2 2017 · score 5.2 2018 · score 5.4 2019 · score 5.4 2020 · score 7.4 2021 · score 7.4 2022 · score 6.4 2023 · score 6.2 2024 · score 6.6 2025 · score 6.4 2026 · score 6.3

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 7.5 Regional 7.5 State 6.2 Economic 8.8 Supply 6.7 Rent Control 8.0 Eviction 5.9 Tenant 7.4 Housing 8.1 6.3 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +37.8% (2024)
    7.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    7.5
  3. State political climate
    Massachusetts legislature & governorship
    6.2
  4. Economic stress
    22.0% poverty · 14.1% unemp.
    8.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $963 average · 33.5% renters
    6.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    33.1% of income on rent
    8.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    196 days filing → judgment
    5.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    33.5% renters
    7.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    8.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Orange and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Orange compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Franklin County
Very High
#1 of 8 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 8 cities in Franklin County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Massachusetts
Very High
#12 of 248 cities
Rank in state, 96th percentileLowHigh
#12 of 248 cities in Massachusetts for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Orange risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Orange: 6.36.3OrangeThis cityCounty: 6.06.0Countyavg in countyState: 6.26.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.3
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+3.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 196d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $963/mo. A contested eviction takes 196 days and costs $10,469–$27,219 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 33.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 3,737 residents, 33.5% rent. 33% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 22.0% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 7.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 7.5 and 7.5 (Dem margin +37.8% (2024)). State climate at 6.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 5.9, housing court bias 8.1, rent-control risk 8. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +0.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 8.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 8.8. Supply constraint: 6.7. The numbers behind those: 22.0% poverty, 14.1% unemployment, 33% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Orange sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Worcester, MA · 184d · ~$19.8k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.4 Worcester Springfield, MA · 191d · ~$20.6k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.7 Springfield Lowell, MA · 198d · ~$19.9k all-in ($101/day) · score 6.1 Lowell Framingham, MA · 189d · ~$20.6k all-in ($109/day) · score 5.7 Framingham Chicopee, MA · 203d · ~$21.3k all-in ($105/day) · score 6 Chicopee Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Cambridge, MA · 212d · ~$19.8k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Cambridge Brockton, MA · 207d · ~$19.7k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.2 Brockton Quincy, MA · 216d · ~$18.5k all-in ($85/day) · score 6.2 Quincy Lynn, MA · 195d · ~$20.6k all-in ($106/day) · score 6 Lynn Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Orange
Orange · 196d · ~$18.8k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Orange, MA

Landlording in Orange, Massachusetts, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.3/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Orange is a city of 3,737 residents where 33.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 33.1% of income on rent. At an average rent of $963/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Orange eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 5.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Orange closes 196 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Orange's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 8.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Orange runs $10,469 to $27,219 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 196 days of typical timeline and $963/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.4/10 in Orange, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Massachusetts, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Orange: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Massachusetts's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $27,219 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Orange

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Cost-versus-timeline trade-off: at 196 days and roughly $27,219 on the high end, cash-for-keys at $10,887 to $16,331 typically beats the legal route for non-aggravated cases. Default judgment frequency is high under MGL 239 + Housing Court.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is "source-of-income protection" and how does it affect me?

Source-of-income protection in Massachusetts means you cannot refuse to rent to someone solely because they use a housing voucher (like Section 8) or other forms of public assistance to pay rent. You must treat their income from a voucher the same as income from a job. You can still screen them based on other criteria, like credit history and past rental behavior, but you can't have a blanket "no Section 8" policy. This is a statewide law and applies in Orange.

Q2

Can I charge a late fee for overdue rent in Orange?

Yes, you can charge a late fee, but Massachusetts law dictates specific rules. You cannot charge a late fee until rent is 30 days overdue. The late fee cannot exceed 5% of the monthly rent. Any lease clause that attempts to charge late fees earlier or higher amounts is unenforceable. Make sure your lease reflects these limits to avoid legal issues.

Q3

What if my tenant abandons the property? Can I just change the locks?

No, absolutely not. In Massachusetts, changing the locks or otherwise denying a tenant access to the property without a court order is considered an illegal lockout, even if you believe they've abandoned it. You could face significant penalties, including triple damages. You must follow the formal eviction process, even if the tenant appears to have moved out, unless you have a signed agreement from them surrendering possession. When in doubt, consult your attorney.

Q4

How often can I raise the rent in Orange? Is there rent control?

Currently, there is no statewide rent control in Massachusetts, and Orange does not have its own local rent control ordinances. This means you can generally raise the rent to market rates, provided you give proper notice. For month-to-month tenancies, you typically need to give at least 30 days' written notice before the rent increase takes effect. If you have a lease, you can only raise the rent when the lease term ends, and you'd offer a new lease with the increased amount. Keep an eye on the Massachusetts rent control rules, as these things can change.

Q5

What common mistakes do landlords make during eviction in Massachusetts?

The most common mistakes include: improper notice (wrong dates, wrong content, improper service), accepting partial rent after serving a notice (which can waive the notice), trying to evict without going through court (illegal lockouts), not having an attorney, and failing to properly handle security deposits. Each of these can lead to major delays, dismissals, and costly legal battles. The system is designed to punish landlord missteps.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.3/10 places Orange in the 96th percentile of Massachusetts cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.