Skip to content
Cedar Crest, Massachusetts eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,730 residents

Cedar Crest, MA Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Plymouth County · Population 1,730

In 2026
Risk score
5.5
ELEVATED

18th percentile, Massachusetts.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.2 Average3.9 Now5.5
7.1 2.2 1976 · score 2.9 1977 · score 2.8 1978 · score 2.7 1979 · score 2.7 1980 · score 2.7 1981 · score 2.7 1982 · score 2.7 1983 · score 2.6 1984 · score 2.4 1985 · score 2.3 1986 · score 2.3 1987 · score 2.2 1988 · score 2.5 1989 · score 2.6 1990 · score 2.8 1991 · score 2.9 1992 · score 3.3 1993 · score 3.3 1994 · score 3.5 1995 · score 3.2 1996 · score 3.8 1997 · score 3.9 1998 · score 3.9 1999 · score 4.0 2000 · score 3.9 2001 · score 4.0 2002 · score 4.0 2003 · score 4.1 2004 · score 4.0 2005 · score 4.0 2006 · score 4.1 2007 · score 4.1 2008 · score 4.3 2009 · score 4.5 2010 · score 4.5 2011 · score 4.5 2012 · score 4.5 2013 · score 4.5 2014 · score 4.5 2015 · score 4.5 2016 · score 4.7 2017 · score 4.8 2018 · score 4.9 2019 · score 5.0 2020 · score 7.1 2021 · score 7.1 2022 · score 6.1 2023 · score 5.9 2024 · score 5.8 2025 · score 5.6 2026 · score 5.5

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from constituent census tracts, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.3 Regional 6.3 State 6.2 Economic 2.7 Supply 2.5 Rent Control 5.0 Eviction 6.0 Tenant 2.5 Housing 5.2 5.5 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +8.8% (2024)
    6.3
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.3
  3. State political climate
    Massachusetts legislature & governorship
    6.2
  4. Economic stress
    2.4% poverty · 0.8% unemp.
    2.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,239 average · 14.4% renters
    2.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    48.9% of income on rent
    5.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    219 days filing → judgment
    6.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    14.4% renters
    2.5
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.2
Geographic context

Risk heat across Cedar Crest and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Cedar Crest compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Plymouth County
Very Low
#25 of 30 cities
Rank in county, 17th percentileLowHigh
#25 of 30 cities in Plymouth County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Massachusetts
Very Low
#207 of 248 cities
Rank in state, 17th percentileLowHigh
#207 of 248 cities in Massachusetts for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Cedar Crest risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Cedar Crest: 5.55.5Cedar CrestThis cityCounty: 6.06.0Countyavg in countyState: 6.26.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 5.5
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 5.5/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.6 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 219d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,239/mo. A contested eviction takes 219 days and costs $12,913–$30,186 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 14.4%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,730 residents, 14.4% rent. 49% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 2.4% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.3
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.3 and 6.3 (Dem margin +8.8% (2024)). State climate at 6.2, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.2
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6.2/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6, housing court bias 5.2, rent-control risk 5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 2.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 2.7. Supply constraint: 2.5. The numbers behind those: 2.4% poverty, 0.8% unemployment, 49% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Cedar Crest sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Cambridge, MA · 212d · ~$19.8k all-in ($93/day) · score 7.1 Cambridge Brockton, MA · 207d · ~$19.7k all-in ($95/day) · score 6.2 Brockton Quincy, MA · 216d · ~$18.5k all-in ($85/day) · score 6.2 Quincy Lynn, MA · 195d · ~$20.6k all-in ($106/day) · score 6 Lynn New Bedford, MA · 210d · ~$18.3k all-in ($87/day) · score 6.6 New Bedford Fall River, MA · 186d · ~$19.7k all-in ($106/day) · score 6 Fall River Newton, MA · 200d · ~$18.9k all-in ($95/day) · score 5.6 Newton Somerville, MA · 190d · ~$20.6k all-in ($108/day) · score 6.6 Somerville Framingham, MA · 189d · ~$20.6k all-in ($109/day) · score 5.7 Framingham Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Cedar Crest
Cedar Crest · 219d · ~$21.5k all-in ($98/day) · score 5.5 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Cedar Crest, MA

Landlording in Cedar Crest, Massachusetts, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 5.5/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Cedar Crest is a city of 1,730 residents where 14.4% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 48.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,239/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Cedar Crest eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Cedar Crest closes 219 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Cedar Crest's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.2/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Cedar Crest runs $12,913 to $30,186 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 219 days of typical timeline and $1,239/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.5/10 in Cedar Crest, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Massachusetts, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Cedar Crest: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Massachusetts's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $30,186 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Cedar Crest

Trap · MASSACHUSETTS
Plymouth County court applies Massachusetts statute uniformly. Filing fee, notice period, and trial-to-writ timeline are set at the state level. At 5.5/10 local risk, default judgment frequency is typical.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the absolute fastest I can evict someone in Cedar Crest for non-payment?

The absolute fastest, if everything goes perfectly and the tenant doesn't contest, is still going to be several months. The 14-day notice is just the start. After that, you're looking at court filing, service, hearing dates, and then the execution of the judgment. Even without a tenant fighting, it's a minimum of 2-3 months, but the typical 219-day average is far more realistic for most cases.

Q2

Can I turn off utilities if my tenant stops paying rent?

Absolutely not. That's an illegal self-help eviction in Massachusetts and can lead to severe penalties, including fines and damages awarded to the tenant. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts. Cutting off utilities is one of the quickest ways to turn a bad situation into a legal nightmare for yourself.

Q3

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Cedar Crest?

While not strictly required by law for residential evictions, it is highly, highly recommended in Massachusetts. The legal process is complex, tenant protections are strong, and procedural errors are common and costly. Given the 6 eviction-process-difficulty score, trying to do it yourself is a huge gamble that usually backfires. An attorney will save you time, money, and stress in the long run.

Q4

What if my tenant claims my property has issues to avoid eviction?

Tenants in Massachusetts can raise "conditions" defenses or counterclaims, alleging that the property has code violations or habitability issues. If they prove these, it can significantly delay or even defeat your eviction case. It's crucial to keep your property well-maintained and address repair requests promptly and in writing. Good records of maintenance are your defense against such claims. This is why regular property inspections and addressing issues proactively are critical.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 5.5/10 places Cedar Crest in the 18th percentile of Massachusetts cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.