Skip to content
Kingsford, Michigan eviction risk overview
City brief · 5,124 residents

Kingsford, MI Eviction Risk: LOW

Dickinson County · Population 5,124

In 2026
Risk score
3
LOW

59th percentile, Michigan.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.7 Average2.6 Now3
4.2 1.7 1976 · score 2.1 1977 · score 2.0 1978 · score 1.9 1979 · score 2.0 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.1 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 1.7 1989 · score 1.7 1990 · score 1.7 1991 · score 1.9 1992 · score 2.3 1993 · score 2.3 1994 · score 2.2 1995 · score 2.2 1996 · score 2.4 1997 · score 2.4 1998 · score 2.5 1999 · score 2.5 2000 · score 2.4 2001 · score 2.5 2002 · score 2.6 2003 · score 2.6 2004 · score 2.5 2005 · score 2.6 2006 · score 2.6 2007 · score 2.7 2008 · score 3.2 2009 · score 3.4 2010 · score 3.5 2011 · score 3.5 2012 · score 3.4 2013 · score 3.3 2014 · score 3.2 2015 · score 3.0 2016 · score 3.0 2017 · score 2.9 2018 · score 2.9 2019 · score 2.8 2020 · score 4.1 2021 · score 4.2 2022 · score 3.3 2023 · score 3.0 2024 · score 3.0 2025 · score 3.0 2026 · score 3.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 4.0 Regional 4.0 State 3.3 Economic 6.0 Supply 5.3 Rent Control 5.5 Eviction 3.1 Tenant 6.1 Housing 5.3 3 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +36.3% (2024)
    4.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    4.0
  3. State political climate
    Michigan legislature & governorship
    3.3
  4. Economic stress
    9.8% poverty · 5.5% unemp.
    6.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $917 average · 24.0% renters
    5.3
  6. Rent Control risk
    28.3% of income on rent
    5.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    65 days filing → judgment
    3.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    24.0% renters
    6.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    5.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Kingsford and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Kingsford compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Dickinson County
Very High
#1 of 4 cities
Rank in county, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 4 cities in Dickinson County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Michigan
Moderate
#359 of 743 cities
Rank in state, 52nd percentileLowHigh
#359 of 743 cities in Michigan for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Kingsford risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Kingsford: 3.03.0KingsfordThis cityCounty: 2.92.9Countyavg in countyState: 3.33.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.9 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 65d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $917/mo. A contested eviction takes 65 days and costs $2,402–$5,906 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 24.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 5,124 residents, 24.0% rent. 28% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 9.8% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 4 and 4 (GOP margin +36.3% (2024)). State climate at 3.3, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 3.3
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 3.3/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 3.1, housing court bias 5.3, rent-control risk 5.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-1.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6. Supply constraint: 5.3. The numbers behind those: 9.8% poverty, 5.5% unemployment, 28% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Kingsford sits in the slow but cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Detroit, MI · 62d · ~$4.9k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.4 Detroit Grand Rapids, MI · 54d · ~$4.7k all-in ($88/day) · score 3.5 Grand Rapids Warren, MI · 65d · ~$4.5k all-in ($68/day) · score 3.5 Warren Sterling Heights, MI · 56d · ~$4.7k all-in ($83/day) · score 3.2 Sterling Heights Ann Arbor, MI · 55d · ~$4.3k all-in ($77/day) · score 3.6 Ann Arbor Lansing, MI · 64d · ~$4.5k all-in ($70/day) · score 3.7 Lansing Dearborn, MI · 56d · ~$4.6k all-in ($81/day) · score 3.4 Dearborn Livonia, MI · 62d · ~$5.0k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.1 Livonia Troy, MI · 59d · ~$4.3k all-in ($73/day) · score 2.9 Troy Westland, MI · 57d · ~$4.7k all-in ($82/day) · score 3.1 Westland Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Kingsford
Kingsford · 65d · ~$4.2k all-in ($64/day) · score 3 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Kingsford, MI

Landlording in Kingsford, Michigan, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Kingsford is a city of 5,124 residents where 24.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 28.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $917/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Kingsford eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 3.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Kingsford closes 65 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Kingsford's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 5.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Kingsford runs $2,402 to $5,906 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 65 days of typical timeline and $917/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 6.1/10 in Kingsford, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Michigan, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Kingsford: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Michigan's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $5,906 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Kingsford

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Kingsford to neighboring cities in Dickinson County via the grid below. The 4.9/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under MCL 600.5701. Dickinson County 2020 presidential margin: R+33.4. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Michigan statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the fastest way to get a non-paying tenant out in Kingsford?

The fastest legal way is usually "cash for keys." Offering a tenant money to move out quickly and amicably can save you months of court proceedings and thousands in lost rent and legal fees. If that fails, issuing the 7-day pay-or-quit notice immediately upon default and then filing in court without delay is the next step.

Q2

Can I really not accept partial rent payments during an eviction?

Generally, no. In Michigan, accepting a partial payment after issuing a notice for non-payment can be seen as waiving your right to proceed with the eviction based on that original notice. You would likely need to issue a new notice. It's safer to either get full payment or proceed with the eviction process.

Q3

Do I need an attorney for an eviction in Kingsford?

While you can represent yourself, it's highly recommended to hire an attorney, especially if you're not familiar with Michigan's specific landlord-tenant laws and court procedures. A lawyer can ensure all notices are correct, filings are timely, and your case is presented effectively, significantly increasing your chances of a swift and successful outcome. See our Michigan eviction risk overview for more details.

Q4

What if my tenant claims there are issues with the property?

If a tenant claims maintenance issues, address them promptly and document all communication and repairs. Michigan law allows tenants to potentially withhold rent for serious habitability issues, though they usually must follow specific procedures. Ignoring legitimate repair requests can complicate an eviction for non-payment. Keep good records of your maintenance efforts.

Q5

Is there rent control in Kingsford, MI?

No, there is no statewide rent control in Michigan, and Kingsford does not have local rent control ordinances. This means you can generally set rent prices and increase them as market conditions dictate, provided you give proper notice as outlined in your lease agreement. However, keep an eye on Michigan rent control rules for any future changes.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3/10 places Kingsford in the 59th percentile of Michigan cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.