Skip to content
Neighborhood · Lansing, MI

Old Forest Eviction Risk: Moderate

1 census tracts · pop 3,192 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 5.4/10 · range 5.4–5.4

Old Forest is a one-tract neighborhood of Lansing, MI and houses 3,192 people. It carries an Eviction Risk Score of 5.4/10, in the Moderate tier. Against a Lansing baseline of 30.1%, 58% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.

What pushes the score up most is economic stress at 9.3/10. The poverty rate is 37%, which shows up in this model as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment.

25% are severely burdened, paying half their income or more in rent. That cohort has no absorption capacity for an unexpected bill, and it is where non-payment filings originate. This is a renter market: 72% of occupied units are tenant-occupied. On the softer side is rent-regulation exposure, at 2/10.

Food insecurity affects 31.3% of adults, 13.5 points above the national rate. CDC survey data puts housing insecurity at 23.1% of adults, against 14.2% nationally. That places it #1 of 30 neighborhoods in Lansing.

The closest comparables inside the same city are Churchill Downs and New Neighbors United. Social vulnerability runs high at 9.3/10, concentrating the disaster- and displacement-exposure this model treats as a lagging risk input.

Average gross rent runs $975, close to the Lansing average. Annual rent works out to 27% of average household income of $43,906.

One tract means one number: 5.4/10 applies directly to any address inside the boundary. Scores move when the ACS release, the court-record feed, or the statute ledger behind them moves.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Old Forest vs Lansing How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
58.4% +94%
Lansing: 30.1%
Average gross rent
$975 -2%
Lansing: $993
Average HH income
$43,906 -16%
Lansing: $52,170
Poverty rate
37.0% +86%
Lansing: 19.9%
Renter share
71.5% +55%
Lansing: 46.2%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Old Forest and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 5.4–5.4

Why Old Forest scores 5.4

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 3.3–3.3 across tracts
3.3
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 6.6–6.6 across tracts
6.6
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 6.0–6.0 across tracts
6.0
Rent control risk
58% of income on rent · Range 2.0–2.0 across tracts
2.0
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 4.5–4.5 across tracts
4.5
Tenant organizing strength
72% renter households · Range 5.0–5.0 across tracts
5.0
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 4.5–4.5 across tracts
4.5
Economic stress
37.0% below poverty line · Range 9.3–9.3 across tracts
9.3
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 3.7–3.7 across tracts
3.7
Risk score comparison

Old Forest vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Old Forest score vs. parent city, state, U.S.5.4Old ForestNeighborhood4.0Parent cityhost city4.2Stateavg in state5.1U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Old Forest

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
26065000700 5.4 3,192 58% $975
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 93

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 93%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 82%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 77%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 83%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Old Forest

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Old Forest

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Old Forest?

Old Forest scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Old Forest compare to Lansing overall?

Old Forest scores 1.4 points higher than Lansing overall (4/10). Renters spend 58% of income on rent vs 30% citywide. Average rent: $975 vs $993.
Q3

What is the average rent in Old Forest?

Average gross rent in Old Forest is $975/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 58% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Old Forest residents are renters?

72% of Old Forest households are renter-occupied (vs 46% in Lansing). The neighborhood has 3,192 residents.
Q5

Is Old Forest a high social-vulnerability area?

Old Forest sits in the 93rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Old Forest for landlords?

Old Forest carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (5.4/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Lansing as a whole (4/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Old Forest?

Old Forest has 2,968 residents. Top groups: Black (non-Hispanic) (42.6%), White (non-Hispanic) (36.4%), Hispanic / Latino (13%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Old Forest

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Lansing

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Old Forest.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further