Neighborhood · Ranked #67,219 of 84,120 nationally
Crissfield Eviction Risk: Lower , Rochester Hills
Tract 26125194100 ·
Oakland County, MI · pop 2,857 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
Census tract 26125194100 covers part of the Crissfield area of Rochester Hills, MI, and scores 3/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 2,857 residents. What pushes it up most is court filing pressure at 9.5/10.
Risk score
3
Lower
Confidence 60% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 0%Stable renters 0%Owners 100%
Tract context
Occupied units1,096
SVI overall0.03
Poverty rate2.2%
Median income$129,457
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50th percentile
#1 of 1 tracts In Crissfield
Moderate
Within parent city
11th percentile
#18 of 20 tracts In Rochester Hills
Very Low
Within county
28th percentile
#253 of 350 tracts In Oakland County
Low
Within state
26th percentile
#2,190 of 2,972 tracts In Michigan
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rochester Hills and the region
Centroid at 42.6423, -83.1409 · click any tract to drill in
Why Crissfield scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rochester Hills
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Michigan legislature & governorship
3.3
Economic stress
2.2% poverty · this tract
1.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rochester Hills
4.6
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rochester Hills
5.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rochester Hills
3.8
How Crissfield compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 3
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
2%Socioeconomic
24%Household composition
24%Racial/ethnic minority
9%Housing & transportation
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
5.9%Housing insecurity
4.1%Utility-shutoff threat
6.7%Food insecurity
4.7%SNAP enrollment
4.1%Transit barriers
3.7%No health insurance
13.2%Frequent mental distress
19.4%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Crissfield
Running cool, economic stress reads 1/10. Disability prevalence runs 19.4% against 31.5% nationally. It sits 1.0 points below the Oakland County average of 4.0.
Well under the midpoint, eviction-process difficulty reads 2.9/10. Inability to pay a utility bill runs 4.1% against 9.2% nationally. Utility arrears usually lead rent arrears by a month or two. Nationally it ranks #67,219 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 1.3/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Statewide the MI average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.2 points cooler.
Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. Model confidence here is 60%, lower than typical because some ACS inputs for this tract carry wide margins of error, so read the score as a band, not a point. Poverty sits at 2%, low enough that arrears here usually signal a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 26125194100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 26125194100?
Census tract 26125194100 in the Crissfield neighborhood scores 3/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the poverty rate in tract 26125194100?
2.2% of residents in tract 26125194100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,857.
Q3
How socially vulnerable is tract 26125194100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 3th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 2th, household 24th, minority 24th, housing 9th.
Q4
Is tract 26125194100 considered part of Crissfield?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 26125194100 fall within Crissfield (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q5
What share of households in tract 26125194100 struggle to pay rent?
About 5.9% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.1% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 26125194100 compare to Rochester Hills overall?
Tract 26125194100 scores 3/10, lower than the parent city of Rochester Hills at 4/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rochester Hills eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rochester Hills
Top eight tracts in Rochester Hills ranked by composite eviction-risk score.