1 census tracts · pop 4,996 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 3/10
· range 3–3
Hitchman's Haven maps to a single census tract in Rochester Hills, MI and houses 4,996 people. It carries an Eviction Risk Score of 3/10, in the Lower tier. Against a Rochester Hills baseline of 27.0%, 45% of renters here cross the 30%-of-income line.
At $663 a month, rents sit 60% under what the rest of Rochester Hills commands. The clearest offset is supply constraint, at 1/10.
On the softer side is economic stress, at 1.1/10. The severe-burden share is 17%. Those renters are past the 50% mark, and they miss rent for reasons that have nothing to do with willingness to pay.
CDC survey data puts housing insecurity at 5.3% of adults, against 14.2% nationally. 3.6% of adults carry no health insurance against 11.3% nationally, a common route into sudden unpayable debt. Well under the midpoint is eviction-process difficulty, at 2.9/10.
Among the 20 mapped neighborhoods of Rochester Hills, it ranks #12 by risk, the middle third. Only 13% of units are renter-occupied. Rental comparables are thin here; price renewals off the nearest genuine rental sub-market rather than off surrounding sale prices. For a like-for-like read, Vistas Of Rochester Hills and Chichester score within a fraction of it.
Against average income of $124,107, annual rent is only 6%, a wide affordability cushion. Poverty sits at 4%, low enough that arrears here usually reflect a specific shock rather than a structural income gap.
Because the boundary contains one tract, 3/10 is simultaneously the area figure and the address-level figure. The number is rebuilt whenever its ACS, court-record, or statutory inputs change.
Risk score
3
Lower
1 tracts · population-weighted
Hitchman's Haven vs Rochester HillsHow this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority33%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport39%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted
Eviction-adjacent indicators in Hitchman's Haven
Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.
5.3%Housing insecurity
3.9%Utility shutoff threat
6.4%Food insecurity
4.7%SNAP enrollment
3.6%No health insurance
21.3%Any disability
Frequently asked
About Hitchman's Haven
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for Hitchman's Haven?
Hitchman's Haven scores 3/10 (Lower tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2
How does Hitchman's Haven compare to Rochester Hills overall?
Hitchman's Haven scores 1.0 points lower than Rochester Hills overall (4/10). Renters spend 45% of income on rent vs 27% citywide. Average rent: $663 vs $1,644.
Q3
What is the average rent in Hitchman's Haven?
Average gross rent in Hitchman's Haven is $663/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 45% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4
What percentage of Hitchman's Haven residents are renters?
13% of Hitchman's Haven households are renter-occupied (vs 23% in Rochester Hills). The neighborhood has 4,996 residents.
Q5
Is Hitchman's Haven a high social-vulnerability area?
Hitchman's Haven sits in the 16th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (low vulnerability). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6
How safe is Hitchman's Haven for landlords?
Hitchman's Haven carries a lower-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (3/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Rochester Hills as a whole (4/10), this neighborhood is lower-risk.
Q7
What is the demographic breakdown of Hitchman's Haven?
Hitchman's Haven has 4,963 residents. Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (82.8%), Other / Multiracial (8.3%), Asian (non-Hispanic) (6.4%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.