Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #75,086 of 84,120 nationally

Glendalough Eviction Risk: Lower , Rosemount

Tract 27037061011 · Dakota County, MN · pop 2,503 · neighborhood within 0.5 mi

Eviction risk in the Glendalough area of Rosemount centers on tract 27037061011, which scores 5.3/10 (Moderate tier) and is home to 2,503 residents. That is riskier than roughly 49% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 41% of renter households, a severe level, and 11% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $2,485 a month while the average household earns $94,321 a year, roughly 32% of income at the averages. About 6% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
1.9
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 2% Stable renters 3% Owners 95%
Tract context
Occupied units991
Renter share5.7%
SVI overall0.06
Poverty rate4.3%
Median income$94,321

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 3 tracts In Glendalough
Moderate
Within parent city
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#3 of 7 tracts In Rosemount
Elevated
Within county
47 th percentile
Rank, 47th percentileLowHigh
#57 of 106 tracts In Dakota County
Moderate
Within state
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#1,184 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rosemount and the region

Centroid at 44.7459, -93.1354 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glendalough scores 1.9

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rosemount
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
4.3% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$2,485 rent vs county FMR
9.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosemount
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosemount
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosemount
3.3

How Glendalough compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glendalough risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 1.91.9This tracttract 061011Rosemount: 4.94.9Rosemountparent cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 6

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glendalough. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glendalough

The score leans hardest on supply constraint at 9.7/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Dakota County average of 5.3 and in line with the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 6th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

In CDC survey modeling, about 6.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 4.3% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27037061011

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061011?

Census tract 27037061011 in the Glendalough neighborhood scores 1.9/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27037061011?

Median gross rent is $2,485/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 41% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061011?

4.3% of residents in tract 27037061011 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,503.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061011?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 6th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 4th, household 15th, minority 24th, housing 21th.
Q5

Is tract 27037061011 considered part of Glendalough?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27037061011 fall within Glendalough (neighborhood centroid within 0.5 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 27037061011 struggle to pay rent?

About 6.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 4.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 27037061011 compare to Rosemount overall?

Tract 27037061011 scores 1.9/10, lower than the parent city of Rosemount at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rosemount

Top eight tracts in Rosemount ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related