Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #73,892 of 84,120 nationally

Glendalough Eviction Risk: Lower , Rosemount

Tract 27037061005 · Dakota County, MN · pop 2,403 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi

Census tract 27037061005 runs through the Glendalough area of Rosemount. With 2,403 residents, it scores 4.5/10 for landlords. It lands near the 23rd percentile nationally for landlord eviction risk.

21% of renter households here spend at least 30% of income on rent, a modest level, and 17% are severely burdened at 50% or more. The typical renter pays about $1,583 a month while the average household earns $96,631 a year, roughly 20% of income at the averages. About 37% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8% Stable renters 30% Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units887
Renter share37.4%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate6.6%
Median income$96,631

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 3 tracts In Glendalough
Very High
Within parent city
83 th percentile
Rank, 83rd percentileLowHigh
#2 of 7 tracts In Rosemount
High
Within county
54 th percentile
Rank, 54th percentileLowHigh
#49 of 106 tracts In Dakota County
Moderate
Within state
24 th percentile
Rank, 24th percentileLowHigh
#1,148 of 1,502 tracts In Minnesota
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rosemount and the region

Centroid at 44.7374, -93.1450 · click any tract to drill in

Why Glendalough scores 2

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Rosemount
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
6.6% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,583 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosemount
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosemount
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosemount
3.3

How Glendalough compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Glendalough risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.02.0This tracttract 061005Rosemount: 4.94.9Rosemountparent cityCounty: 2.12.1Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.53.5Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 32

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 52Total filings over 5 yrs
  • 3.94%Avg annual filing rate
  • 7.4%Peak (2009)
  • 9Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2009 to 2013
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 270370610052009: 19 filings (7.42/100 renter HHs)2010: 11 filings (4.10/100 renter HHs)2011: 5 filings (1.86/100 renter HHs)2012: 8 filings (2.97/100 renter HHs)2013: 9 filings (3.35/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 53% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Glendalough. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Glendalough

The heaviest input here is eviction process difficulty at 4.6/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the Dakota County average of 5.3 and below the Minnesota statewide average of 5.0. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

In CDC survey modeling, about 9.6% of adults here said they could not pay rent or mortgage at some point in the past year, and 6.5% faced a utility shutoff threat, a common early warning before a filing.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 32nd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 27037061005

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061005?

Census tract 27037061005 in the Glendalough neighborhood scores 2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 27037061005?

Median gross rent is $1,583/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061005?

6.6% of residents in tract 27037061005 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,403.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061005?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 41th, minority 39th, housing 61th.
Q5

Is tract 27037061005 considered part of Glendalough?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27037061005 fall within Glendalough (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27037061005?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 52 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27037061005 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.94% of renter households, peaking at 7.4% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7

What share of households in tract 27037061005 struggle to pay rent?

About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 27037061005 compare to Rosemount overall?

Tract 27037061005 scores 2/10, lower than the parent city of Rosemount at 4.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Rosemount

Top eight tracts in Rosemount ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related