Within neighborhood
100
th percentile
Very High
Neighborhood · Ranked #47,371 of 84,120 nationally
Glendalough Eviction Risk: Moderate , Rosemount
Tract 27037061005 · Dakota County, MN · pop 2,403 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
Tract 27037061005 sits in the Glendalough area of Rosemount eviction risk, MN, carrying an eviction-risk score of 4.1/10. Population here is 2,403. 21% of renter households cross the 30%-of-income line, well under the Dakota County average of 45.6%.
Risk score
4.1
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 8%
Stable renters 30%
Owners 62%
Tract context
Occupied units887
Renter share37.4%
SVI overall0.32
Poverty rate6.6%
Median income$96,631
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
83
th percentile
High
Within county
50
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
51
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Rosemount and the region
Centroid at 44.7374, -93.1450 · click any tract to drill in
Why Glendalough scores 4.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Rosemount
6.1
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.7
State political climate
Minnesota legislature & governorship
4.3
Economic stress
6.6% poverty · this tract
1.6
Supply constraint
$1,583 rent vs county FMR
4.4
Rent control risk
Inherited from Rosemount
4.4
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
4.6
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Rosemount
3.4
Housing court bias
Inherited from Rosemount
3.3
How Glendalough compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 32
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 15%Socioeconomic
- 41%Household composition
- 39%Racial/ethnic minority
- 61%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 52Total filings over 5 yrs
- 3.94%Avg annual filing rate
- 7.4%Peak (2009)
- 9Filings in 2013 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 53% over the past 5 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Glendalough. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.6%Housing insecurity
- 6.5%Utility-shutoff threat
- 11.1%Food insecurity
- 7.9%SNAP enrollment
- 7.1%Transit barriers
- 7.6%No health insurance
- 16.0%Frequent mental distress
- 26.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Glendalough
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1.6/10. The severe-burden share is 17%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment. The filing record is not thin: 52 evictions over 5 years of observation.
SNAP participation runs 7.9% against 15.2% nationally. Filings peaked in 2009 at 7.4% of renter households.
In a typical year about 3.9% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 44% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
On the CDC Social Vulnerability Index the tract reads 3.9/10, which tracks how hard a shock lands on the households already here. Of its three components the socioeconomic standing measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Dakota County average of 4.2 closely.
Average gross rent is $1,583, close to the Rosemount average. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $96,631.
37% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 27037061005
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 27037061005?
Census tract 27037061005 in the Glendalough neighborhood scores 4.1/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 27037061005?
Median gross rent is $1,583/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 21% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 27037061005?
6.6% of residents in tract 27037061005 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,403.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 27037061005?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 32th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 15th, household 41th, minority 39th, housing 61th.
Q5
Is tract 27037061005 considered part of Glendalough?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 27037061005 fall within Glendalough (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 27037061005?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 52 eviction filings across 5 validated years in tract 27037061005 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 3.94% of renter households, peaking at 7.4% in 2009. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 27037061005 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.6% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.5% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 27037061005 compare to Rosemount overall?
Tract 27037061005 scores 4.1/10, higher than the parent city of Rosemount at 3.8/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Rosemount eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Rosemount
Top eight tracts in Rosemount ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related