Skip to content
Census Tract · Ranked #66,742 of 84,120 nationally

Crestwood Eviction Risk: Lower

Tract 29189220801 · St. Louis County, MO · pop 5,616 · 33% of tract blocks fall in Crestwood

The Moderate-tier score of 4.8/10 for census tract 29189220801 reflects conditions in Crestwood, Missouri. On the national scale it ranks #57,554 of 84,120 for landlord eviction difficulty.

About 35% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a high level, and 16% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $942 monthly, set against $66,711 in average yearly household income, roughly 17% of income at the averages. About 42% of occupied units are renter-occupied.

Risk score
2.5
Lower
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 15% Stable renters 27% Owners 58%
Tract context
Occupied units2,554
Renter share41.8%
SVI overall0.24
Poverty rate4.3%
Median income$66,711

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within parent city
33 th percentile
Rank, 33rd percentileLowHigh
#3 of 4 tracts In Crestwood
Low
Within county
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#118 of 236 tracts In St. Louis County
Moderate
Within state
23 th percentile
Rank, 23rd percentileLowHigh
#1,282 of 1,654 tracts In Missouri
Low
National
21 th percentile
Rank, 21st percentileLowHigh
#66,742 of 84,120 tracts In U.S.
Low
Geographic context

Risk heat across Crestwood and the region

Centroid at 38.5540, -90.3525 · click any tract to drill in

Why Crestwood scores 2.5

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Crestwood
6.6
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
6.2
State political climate
Missouri legislature & governorship
2.1
Economic stress
4.3% poverty · this tract
1.1
Supply constraint
$942 rent vs county FMR
2.8
Rent control risk
Inherited from Crestwood
3.3
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Crestwood
3.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Crestwood
3.1

How Crestwood compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Crestwood risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 2.52.5This tracttract 220801Crestwood: 2.32.3Crestwoodparent cityCounty: 2.82.8Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.83.8Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 24

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 195Total filings over 8 yrs
  • 2.48%Avg annual filing rate
  • 4.5%Peak (2003)
  • 14Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2003 to 2017
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 291892208012003: 45 filings (4.51/100 renter HHs)2004: 29 filings (2.91/100 renter HHs)2005: 17 filings (1.86/100 renter HHs)2006: 15 filings (1.64/100 renter HHs)2010: 18 filings (1.68/100 renter HHs)2012: 28 filings (3.01/100 renter HHs)2013: 29 filings (3.12/100 renter HHs)2017: 14 filings (1.13/100 renter HHs)
Filings dropped 69% over the past 8 months.

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 191Total filings 2020-21
  • 2.5Avg monthly (observed)
  • 2.0Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 1.27×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 8 filings (2.67× baseline)2020-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2020-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2020-10-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2020-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-01-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-02-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-10-01: 5 filings (3.33× baseline)2021-11-01: 3 filings (0.67× baseline)2021-12-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-02-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2022-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 1 filings (0.67× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (0.89× baseline)2022-12-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-01-01: 7 filings (2.33× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2023-05-01: 6 filings (1.71× baseline)2023-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2023-08-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-10-01: 8 filings (5.33× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (1.56× baseline)2023-12-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-01-01: 3 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2024-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 3 filings (0.86× baseline)2024-06-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-08-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2024-09-01: 1 filings (0.40× baseline)2024-10-01: 9 filings (6.00× baseline)2024-11-01: 2 filings (0.44× baseline)2024-12-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-01-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2025-02-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 2 filings (0.57× baseline)2025-06-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2025-09-01: 6 filings (2.40× baseline)2025-10-01: 2 filings (1.33× baseline)2025-11-01: 1 filings (0.22× baseline)2025-12-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 2 filings (20.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 6 filings (60.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran near baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Southwest Oregon, OR as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Crestwood

The score leans hardest on rent-control risk at 3.3/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Crestwood, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores below the St. Louis County average of 5.6 and in line with the Missouri statewide average of 4.8. Within its own county it reads on the safer side for landlords.

During 2020 and 2021, eviction filings here ran at about 1.27x the pre-COVID monthly baseline, roughly back to the pre-pandemic baseline.

Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 195 eviction filings here over 8 tracked years, with about 2.5% of renter households facing a filing in a typical year. Filings peaked at 4.5% of renter households in 2003.

For a landlord, conditions here are middle-of-the-road. Standard screening and prompt, documented notices usually keep cases short.

Frequently asked

About tract 29189220801

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 29189220801?

Census tract 29189220801 in Crestwood scores 2.5/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 29189220801?

Median gross rent is $942/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 35% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 29189220801?

4.3% of residents in tract 29189220801 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,616.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 29189220801?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 24th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 23th, household 26th, minority 27th, housing 40th.
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 29189220801?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 195 eviction filings across 8 validated years in tract 29189220801 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.48% of renter households, peaking at 4.5% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 29189220801 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 1.27× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings returned near baseline. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Southwest Oregon eviction laws, OR), 2020-2021.
Q7

What share of households in tract 29189220801 struggle to pay rent?

About 8.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 6.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8

How does tract 29189220801 compare to Crestwood overall?

Tract 29189220801 scores 2.5/10, right in line with the parent city of Crestwood at 2.3/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Crestwood; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9

Was tract 29189220801 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Crestwood

Top eight tracts in Crestwood ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related