Skip to content
Spokane Creek, Montana eviction risk overview
City brief · 740 residents

Spokane Creek, MT Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Broadwater County · Population 740

In 2026
Risk score
1.6
VERY LOW

26th percentile, Montana.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.1 Average1.7 Now1.6
10 5 1976 · score 1.3 1977 · score 1.3 1978 · score 1.3 1979 · score 1.3 1980 · score 1.1 1981 · score 1.1 1982 · score 1.2 1983 · score 1.1 1984 · score 1.1 1985 · score 1.1 1986 · score 1.1 1987 · score 1.1 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 1.9 1993 · score 1.9 1994 · score 1.9 1995 · score 1.9 1996 · score 1.7 1997 · score 1.7 1998 · score 1.7 1999 · score 1.8 2000 · score 1.4 2001 · score 1.4 2002 · score 1.4 2003 · score 1.4 2004 · score 1.4 2005 · score 1.4 2006 · score 1.4 2007 · score 1.4 2008 · score 2.2 2009 · score 2.2 2010 · score 2.3 2011 · score 2.3 2012 · score 1.9 2013 · score 1.9 2014 · score 1.9 2015 · score 2.0 2016 · score 1.7 2017 · score 1.8 2018 · score 1.8 2019 · score 1.9 2020 · score 2.2 2021 · score 2.2 2022 · score 2.2 2023 · score 2.2 2024 · score 2.0 2025 · score 1.9 2026 · score 1.6

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.9 Regional 2.9 State 1.7 Economic 1.0 Supply 2.8 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 2.1 Tenant 2.8 Housing 1.7 1.6 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +60.0% (2024)
    2.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.9
  3. State political climate
    Montana legislature & governorship
    1.7
  4. Economic stress
    12.3% poverty · 5.8% unemp.
    1.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,116 average · 12.0% renters
    2.8
  6. Rent Control risk
    38.7% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    26 days filing → judgment
    2.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    12.0% renters
    2.8
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Spokane Creek and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Spokane Creek compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Broadwater County
Elevated
#4 of 9 cities
Rank in county, 63rd percentileBottomTop
#4 of 9 cities in Broadwater County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Montana
Very Low
#405 of 496 cities
Rank in state, 18th percentileBottomTop
#405 of 496 cities in Montana for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Spokane Creek risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Spokane Creek: 1.61.6Spokane CreekThis cityCounty: 1.61.6Countyavg in countyState: 2.22.2Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 1.6
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 1.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 26d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,116/mo. A contested eviction takes 26 days and costs $906-$2,740 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 12.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 740 residents, 12.0% rent. 39% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 12.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.9 and 2.9 (GOP margin +60.0% (2024)). State climate at 1.7, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.7
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.7/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.1, housing court bias 1.7, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 1. Supply constraint: 2.8. The numbers behind those: 12.3% poverty, 5.8% unemployment, 39% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Spokane Creek sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Spokane Creek, MT

Landlording in Spokane Creek, Montana, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 1.6/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Spokane Creek is a city of 740 residents where 12.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 38.7% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,116/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Spokane Creek eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Spokane Creek closes 26 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Spokane Creek's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Spokane Creek runs $906 to $2,740 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 26 days of typical timeline and $1,116/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.8/10 in Spokane Creek, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Montana, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Spokane Creek: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Montana's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,740 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Spokane Creek

Trap · 1.9/10
The 1.9/10 score combines local political climate, court bias, cost-of-eviction, tenant organizing strength, and the likelihood of new tenant-protective legislation. See the breakdown above for Spokane Creek-specific sub-scores.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Spokane Creek without a reason?

For month-to-month leases, yes, with a 30-day notice. Montana does not have statewide just-cause eviction requirements. For a fixed-term lease, you generally need a lease violation to terminate early.

Q2

How long does it take to get a tenant out for not paying rent?

The typical timeline in Spokane Creek is about 26 days from the initial 3-day notice to the sheriff lockout. This can vary if the tenant contests the eviction, but it's generally a fast process.

Q3

Is there a limit to how much I can charge for a security deposit?

No, Montana state law does not set a cap on security deposits. However, it's common practice to charge one to two months' rent. You must return it within 10 days if no deductions, or 30 days with an itemized list if deductions are made.

Q4

What's the biggest mistake landlords make during eviction here?

The biggest mistake is failing to serve proper notice or waiting too long to file after the notice period expires. Procedural errors can cause significant delays or force you to restart the entire process, costing you more in lost rent and legal fees.

Q5

Should I offer "cash for keys" in Spokane Creek?

It's often a good strategy, especially if you anticipate a difficult tenant. Offering a tenant money to vacate quickly and peacefully can save you significant time, legal fees, and potential damage repair costs compared to a drawn-out eviction. It's a business decision, not a weakness.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 1.6/10 places Spokane Creek in the 26th percentile of Montana cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.