Neighborhood · Ranked #63,308 of 84,120 nationally
Westside Eviction Risk: Lower , Great Falls
Tract 30013001800 ·
Cascade County, MT · pop 3,708 · neighborhood within 1.0 mi
With a score of 3.2/10, tract 30013001800 in the Westside area of Great Falls, MT reads lower for landlord eviction risk. 38% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Risk score
3.2
Lower
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 7%Stable renters 6%Owners 87%
Tract context
Occupied units1,449
Renter share13.2%
SVI overall0.39
Poverty rate15.9%
Median income$81,799
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
0th percentile
#2 of 2 tracts In Westside
Very Low
Within parent city
33th percentile
#13 of 19 tracts In Great Falls
Low
Within county
42th percentile
#15 of 25 tracts In Cascade County
Moderate
Within state
40th percentile
#192 of 319 tracts In Montana
Low
Geographic context
Risk heat across Great Falls and the region
Centroid at 47.5256, -111.3229 · click any tract to drill in
Why Westside scores 3.2
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Great Falls
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
15.9% poverty · this tract
4.0
Supply constraint
$1,180 rent vs county FMR
4.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Great Falls
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Great Falls
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Great Falls
2.0
How Westside compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 39
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
9.7%Housing insecurity
7.2%Utility-shutoff threat
12.9%Food insecurity
9.3%SNAP enrollment
7.8%Transit barriers
9.5%No health insurance
19.1%Frequent mental distress
36.1%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Westside
Against Cascade County at 37.1%, 54% of renters here are cost-burdened. The clearest offset is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10.
Average gross rent is $1,180, 31% above the Great Falls average. Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.7/10. On the national scale it lands near the 25th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored.
At 13% renter-occupied this is predominantly owner territory, and comps have to be drawn from further out. CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 4.5/10.
Against average income of $81,799, annual rent is just 17%. It tracks the Cascade County average of 3.5 closely.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 30013001800
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30013001800?
Census tract 30013001800 in the Westside neighborhood scores 3.2/10 (Lower tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 30013001800?
Median gross rent is $1,180/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 54% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 30013001800?
15.9% of residents in tract 30013001800 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,708.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 30013001800?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 39th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 27th, household 57th, minority 28th, housing 53th.
Q5
Is tract 30013001800 considered part of Westside?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 30013001800 fall within Westside (neighborhood centroid within 1.0 miles, OSM data).
Q6
What share of households in tract 30013001800 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.7% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7
How does tract 30013001800 compare to Great Falls overall?
Tract 30013001800 scores 3.2/10, right in line with the parent city of Great Falls at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Great Falls
Top eight tracts in Great Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.