Within parent city
72
th percentile
Elevated
Census Tract · Ranked #48,956 of 84,120 nationally
Great Falls Eviction Risk: Moderate
Tract 30013002100 · Cascade County, MT · pop 4,984 · 68% of tract blocks fall in Great Falls
With a score of 4/10, tract 30013002100 in Great Falls, MT reads moderate for landlord eviction risk. It is home to 4,984 residents. Severe burden reaches 30%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
4
Moderate
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 22%
Stable renters 25%
Owners 53%
Tract context
Occupied units2,447
Renter share47.3%
SVI overall0.59
Poverty rate16.7%
Median income$54,154
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within county
83
th percentile
High
Within state
69
th percentile
Elevated
National
42
th percentile
Moderate
Geographic context
Risk heat across Great Falls and the region
Centroid at 47.4705, -111.2159 · click any tract to drill in
Why Great Falls scores 4
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Great Falls
2.5
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.0
State political climate
Montana legislature & governorship
1.7
Economic stress
16.7% poverty · this tract
4.2
Supply constraint
$882 rent vs county FMR
2.1
Rent control risk
Inherited from Great Falls
1.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.0
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Great Falls
1.5
Housing court bias
Inherited from Great Falls
2.0
How Great Falls compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 59
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 51%Socioeconomic
- 50%Household composition
- 19%Racial/ethnic minority
- 81%Housing & transportation
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 9.4%Housing insecurity
- 7.2%Utility-shutoff threat
- 14.0%Food insecurity
- 10.3%SNAP enrollment
- 8.6%Transit barriers
- 10.0%No health insurance
- 18.5%Frequent mental distress
- 38.5%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Great Falls
The main counterweight is rent-regulation exposure at 1/10. Running cool, tenant-organizing strength reads 1.5/10. Against Cascade County at 37.1%, 47% of renters here are cost-burdened.
On the softer side, state political climate reads 1.7/10. That is riskier than roughly 42% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 6.3/10. Of its three components the housing type and transport measure is the most pressured. It tracks the Cascade County average of 3.5 closely.
Average gross rent is $882, close to the Great Falls average. Annual rent works out to 20% of average household income of $54,154. 47% of occupied units are renter-occupied.
All figures here are ACS 5-year estimates for this tract, refreshed as the underlying releases land.
Frequently asked
About tract 30013002100
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 30013002100?
Census tract 30013002100 in Great Falls scores 4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 30013002100?
Median gross rent is $882/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 30013002100?
16.7% of residents in tract 30013002100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 4,984.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 30013002100?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 59th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 51th, household 50th, minority 19th, housing 81th.
Q5
What share of households in tract 30013002100 struggle to pay rent?
About 9.4% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 7.2% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q6
How does tract 30013002100 compare to Great Falls overall?
Tract 30013002100 scores 4/10, higher than the parent city of Great Falls at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Great Falls eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Great Falls
Top eight tracts in Great Falls ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · MT
Downtown
4.6
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MT
Downtown
4.6
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MT
Central
4.6
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MT
Downtown
4.1
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MT
Downtown
4
/ 10 · Moderate
Tract · MT
Westside
3.8
/ 10 · Low
Tract · MT
Sunnyside
3.7
/ 10 · Low
Tract · MT
30013002201
3.4
/ 10 · Low
Related