Skip to content
Starr School, Montana eviction risk overview
City brief · 235 residents

Starr School, MT Eviction Risk: VERY LOW

Glacier County · Population 235

In 2026
Risk score
2.1
VERY LOW

69th percentile, Montana.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.1 Average2.6 Now2.1
3.9 2.1 1976 · score 2.1 1977 · score 2.2 1978 · score 2.2 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 2.2 1981 · score 2.2 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.2 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.1 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.1 1988 · score 2.4 1989 · score 2.4 1990 · score 2.5 1991 · score 2.5 1992 · score 2.8 1993 · score 2.8 1994 · score 2.8 1995 · score 2.9 1996 · score 2.8 1997 · score 2.7 1998 · score 2.7 1999 · score 2.7 2000 · score 2.6 2001 · score 2.6 2002 · score 2.5 2003 · score 2.5 2004 · score 2.4 2005 · score 2.3 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.1 2008 · score 2.9 2009 · score 3.1 2010 · score 3.1 2011 · score 3.1 2012 · score 3.0 2013 · score 2.9 2014 · score 2.8 2015 · score 2.7 2016 · score 2.7 2017 · score 2.6 2018 · score 2.6 2019 · score 2.5 2020 · score 3.7 2021 · score 3.9 2022 · score 3.0 2023 · score 2.3 2024 · score 2.2 2025 · score 2.1 2026 · score 2.1

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.9 Regional 6.9 State 1.7 Economic 5.4 Supply 1.0 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 1.6 Tenant 1.0 Housing 1.1 2.1 VERY LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +19.6% (2024)
    6.9
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.9
  3. State political climate
    Montana legislature & governorship
    1.7
  4. Economic stress
    46.7% poverty · 15.6% unemp.
    5.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $480 average · 54.9% renters
    1.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    23.8% of income on rent
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    30 days filing → judgment
    1.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    54.9% renters
    1.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    1.1
Geographic context

Risk heat across Starr School and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Starr School compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Glacier County
Very Low
#13 of 14 cities
Rank in county, 8th percentileLowHigh
#13 of 14 cities in Glacier County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Montana
Elevated
#186 of 496 cities
Rank in state, 63rd percentileLowHigh
#186 of 496 cities in Montana for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Starr School risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Starr School: 2.12.1Starr SchoolThis cityCounty: 2.52.5Countyavg in countyState: 2.32.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.1
    / 10 · VERY LOW
    The verdict

    A Very low-tier market.

    Composite 2.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.0 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 30d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $480/mo. A contested eviction takes 30 days and costs $778–$2,776 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 54.9%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 235 residents, 54.9% rent. 24% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 46.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.9
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.9 and 6.9 (Dem margin +19.6% (2024)). State climate at 1.7, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 1.7
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 1.7/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.6, housing court bias 1.1, rent-control risk 1. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.4. Supply constraint: 1. The numbers behind those: 46.7% poverty, 15.6% unemployment, 24% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Starr School sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
00Overview

About eviction risk in Starr School, MT

Landlording in Starr School, Montana, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.1/10 (VERY LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Starr School is a city of 235 residents where 54.9% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 23.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $480/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Starr School eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.6/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Starr School closes 30 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Starr School's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 1.1/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Starr School runs $778 to $2,776 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 30 days of typical timeline and $480/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 1/10 in Starr School, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Montana, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Starr School: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a VERY LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Montana's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $2,776 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Starr School

Trap · 30.6 POINTS
Glacier County voted Democratic by 30.6 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with tenant-protective legislative pressure under Mont. Code 70-24 URLTA.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the fastest way to get a tenant out who isn't paying rent?

The fastest legal way is to serve a 3-day pay-or-quit notice as soon as rent is late. If they don't pay or leave, file for eviction immediately. Consider "cash for keys" as a faster, less confrontational alternative to avoid court entirely.

Q2

Can I just change the locks if my tenant stops paying?

Absolutely not. Changing locks, shutting off utilities, or removing a tenant's belongings without a court order is an illegal eviction in Montana. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts, or you could face significant penalties.

Q3

Do I need a lawyer for an eviction in Starr School?

While Montana's eviction process is relatively straightforward, having an attorney can prevent costly mistakes, especially if you're new to evictions or if the tenant is disputing the case. For a typical non-payment eviction, you might be able to handle it yourself, but an attorney ensures all paperwork is correct and deadlines are met.

Q4

What happens if my tenant leaves belongings behind after an eviction?

Montana law requires you to store abandoned property for a specific period (usually 7 days after giving notice to the tenant). You must send a notice to the tenant's last known address stating where the property is stored and when they must claim it. If they don't claim it, you can dispose of it or sell it, deducting reasonable storage and sale costs. Check MCA § 70-24-430 for specifics.

Q5

Is there a limit to how much I can charge for a security deposit in Montana?

No, Montana state law does not set a maximum limit for security deposits. However, it's generally advisable to charge a reasonable amount, typically one to two months' rent, to remain competitive and fair.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.1/10 places Starr School in the 69th percentile of Montana cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.