Skip to content
Tonopah, Nevada eviction risk overview
City brief · 1,910 residents

Tonopah, NV Eviction Risk: LOW

Nye County · Population 1,910

In 2026
Risk score
3.4
LOW

15th percentile, Nevada.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.4 Average2.4 Now3.4
4.8 1.4 1976 · score 1.9 1977 · score 1.8 1978 · score 1.7 1979 · score 1.7 1980 · score 1.8 1981 · score 1.9 1982 · score 2.0 1983 · score 2.0 1984 · score 1.9 1985 · score 1.5 1986 · score 1.5 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.4 1989 · score 1.4 1990 · score 1.5 1991 · score 1.5 1992 · score 1.9 1993 · score 1.9 1994 · score 1.9 1995 · score 1.9 1996 · score 1.8 1997 · score 1.8 1998 · score 1.8 1999 · score 1.8 2000 · score 2.0 2001 · score 2.1 2002 · score 2.2 2003 · score 2.2 2004 · score 2.1 2005 · score 2.2 2006 · score 2.2 2007 · score 2.3 2008 · score 3.0 2009 · score 3.2 2010 · score 3.3 2011 · score 3.3 2012 · score 3.2 2013 · score 3.2 2014 · score 3.1 2015 · score 3.0 2016 · score 2.9 2017 · score 2.8 2018 · score 2.8 2019 · score 2.8 2020 · score 4.5 2021 · score 4.8 2022 · score 3.5 2023 · score 3.5 2024 · score 3.3 2025 · score 3.4 2026 · score 3.4

Key metrics

Estimated values: The U.S. Census suppresses field-level data for small places. Estimated from county average, pop-weighted from real underlying ACS data.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 2.5 Regional 2.5 State 3.7 Economic 4.4 Supply 5.7 Rent Control 5.5 Eviction 3.5 Tenant 7.1 Housing 6.7 3.4 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +42.2% (2024)
    2.5
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    2.5
  3. State political climate
    Nevada legislature & governorship
    3.7
  4. Economic stress
    19.7% poverty · 6.9% unemp.
    4.4
  5. Supply constraint
    $843 average · 36.8% renters
    5.7
  6. Rent Control risk
    28.3% of income on rent
    5.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    80 days filing → judgment
    3.5
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    36.8% renters
    7.1
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    6.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Tonopah and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Tonopah compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Nye County
Very Low
#6 of 6 cities
Rank in county, 0th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 6 cities in Nye County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Nevada
Very Low
#118 of 132 cities
Rank in state, 11th percentileLowHigh
#118 of 132 cities in Nevada for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Tonopah risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Tonopah: 3.43.4TonopahThis cityCounty: 4.54.5Countyavg in countyState: 4.44.4Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.4
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.5 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 80d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $843/mo. A contested eviction takes 80 days and costs $3,332–$7,776 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 36.8%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 1,910 residents, 36.8% rent. 28% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 19.7% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 2.5
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 2.5 and 2.5 (GOP margin +42.2% (2024)). State climate at 3.7, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 3.7
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 3.7/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 3.5, housing court bias 6.7, rent-control risk 5.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-1.5 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 4.4
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 4.4. Supply constraint: 5.7. The numbers behind those: 19.7% poverty, 6.9% unemployment, 28% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Tonopah sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Las Vegas, NV · 73d · ~$6.1k all-in ($83/day) · score 4.5 Las Vegas Henderson, NV · 85d · ~$6.0k all-in ($70/day) · score 4.2 Henderson North Las Vegas, NV · 81d · ~$6.3k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.7 North Las Vegas Reno, NV · 87d · ~$7.1k all-in ($82/day) · score 4.4 Reno Enterprise, NV · 76d · ~$6.6k all-in ($87/day) · score 4.3 Enterprise Spring Valley, NV · 75d · ~$6.4k all-in ($85/day) · score 4.4 Spring Valley Sunrise Manor, NV · 73d · ~$6.2k all-in ($84/day) · score 4.5 Sunrise Manor Paradise, NV · 77d · ~$7.0k all-in ($91/day) · score 4.6 Paradise Sparks, NV · 80d · ~$5.8k all-in ($72/day) · score 4.1 Sparks Carson, NV · 77d · ~$5.5k all-in ($72/day) · score 4.1 Carson Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Tonopah
Tonopah · 80d · ~$5.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Tonopah, NV

Landlording in Tonopah, Nevada, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.4/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Tonopah is a city of 1,910 residents where 36.8% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 28.3% of income on rent. At an average rent of $843/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Tonopah eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 3.5/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Tonopah closes 80 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Tonopah's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 6.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Tonopah runs $3,332 to $7,776 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 80 days of typical timeline and $843/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 7.1/10 in Tonopah, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Nevada, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Tonopah: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Nevada's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $7,776 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Tonopah

Trap · PRACTICAL TRAP
Compare Tonopah to neighboring cities in Esmeralda County via the grid below. The 3.5/10 score is computed from nine sub-factors plus a state-law multiplier under NRS 40.253 Summary. Esmeralda County 2020 presidential margin: R+66.9. Cross-reference the state overview link in the guides section for Nevada statutory detail.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What is the most common reason for eviction in Tonopah?

The vast majority of evictions in Tonopah, like elsewhere, are for non-payment of rent. Even with a low rent-to-income ratio, financial difficulties can arise. Other reasons include lease violations like unauthorized occupants, property damage, or nuisance behavior, but these are less frequent.

Q2

Can I evict a tenant in Tonopah without a reason?

Yes, for month-to-month tenancies, Nevada law does not require "just cause" for termination. You can issue a 30-day no-cause termination notice. For fixed-term leases, you must wait until the lease expires or have a specific lease violation to terminate early. For more on this, see our Esmeralda County eviction guide.

Q3

How much notice do I need to give for a rent increase in Tonopah?

For month-to-month tenancies in Nevada, you generally need to give 45 days' written notice for a rent increase. For weekly tenancies, it's 15 days. Always check your lease agreement for any specific clauses regarding rent increases, but the statutory minimums must be met. There are no Nevada rent control rules to worry about in Tonopah.

Q4

What happens if my tenant abandons the property?

If you believe a tenant has abandoned the property, you must follow specific procedures under NRS § 118A.450. You typically need to post a notice of abandonment and mail it, giving the tenant a set number of days to respond. If they don't, you can legally regain possession. Do not assume abandonment and change locks without following the statutory process.

Q5

Can I deduct cleaning costs from the security deposit?

You can deduct cleaning costs from a security deposit if the property is not returned in the same condition it was received, beyond normal wear and tear. You cannot charge for routine cleaning that would be necessary between tenants regardless. Always provide an itemized list of deductions. For full details, refer to Nevada security deposit rules.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.4/10 places Tonopah in the 15th percentile of Nevada cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.