Skip to content
Medford Lakes, New Jersey eviction risk overview
City brief · 4,297 residents

Medford Lakes, NJ Eviction Risk: ELEVATED

Burlington County · Population 4,297

In 2026
Risk score
6.9
ELEVATED

31th percentile, New Jersey.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min3.3 Average5.3 Now6.9
7.8 3.3 1976 · score 4.0 1977 · score 3.9 1978 · score 3.9 1979 · score 3.9 1980 · score 3.9 1981 · score 3.8 1982 · score 3.9 1983 · score 3.8 1984 · score 3.6 1985 · score 3.5 1986 · score 3.4 1987 · score 3.3 1988 · score 3.5 1989 · score 3.5 1990 · score 3.6 1991 · score 3.8 1992 · score 4.5 1993 · score 4.5 1994 · score 4.5 1995 · score 4.5 1996 · score 5.2 1997 · score 5.2 1998 · score 5.3 1999 · score 5.4 2000 · score 5.3 2001 · score 5.3 2002 · score 5.7 2003 · score 5.7 2004 · score 5.6 2005 · score 5.5 2006 · score 5.5 2007 · score 5.4 2008 · score 5.9 2009 · score 6.2 2010 · score 6.3 2011 · score 6.3 2012 · score 6.3 2013 · score 6.4 2014 · score 6.3 2015 · score 6.3 2016 · score 6.3 2017 · score 6.4 2018 · score 6.4 2019 · score 6.5 2020 · score 7.8 2021 · score 7.5 2022 · score 7.2 2023 · score 7.2 2024 · score 7.2 2025 · score 7.0 2026 · score 6.9

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 6.4 Regional 6.4 State 6.8 Economic 3.7 Supply 6.0 Rent Control 5.4 Eviction 6.1 Tenant 2.6 Housing 3.7 6.9 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    Dem margin +16.6% (2024)
    6.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    6.4
  3. State political climate
    New Jersey legislature & governorship
    6.8
  4. Economic stress
    1.3% poverty · 3.6% unemp.
    3.7
  5. Supply constraint
    $2,211 average · 10.0% renters
    6.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    31.9% of income on rent
    5.4
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    189 days filing → judgment
    6.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    10.0% renters
    2.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    3.7
Geographic context

Risk heat across Medford Lakes and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Medford Lakes compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Burlington County
Very Low
#24 of 27 cities
Rank in county, 12th percentileLowHigh
#24 of 27 cities in Burlington County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in New Jersey
Low
#505 of 696 cities
Rank in state, 28th percentileLowHigh
#505 of 696 cities in New Jersey for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Medford Lakes risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Medford Lakes: 6.96.9Medford LakesThis cityCounty: 7.37.3Countyavg in countyState: 7.67.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.9
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.9/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+2.9 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 189d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $2,211/mo. A contested eviction takes 189 days and costs $11,033–$25,608 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 10.0%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 4,297 residents, 10.0% rent. 32% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 1.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 6.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 6.4 and 6.4 (Dem margin +16.6% (2024)). State climate at 6.8, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 6.8
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 6.8/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 6.1, housing court bias 3.7, rent-control risk 5.4. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +1.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.7
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.7. Supply constraint: 6. The numbers behind those: 1.3% poverty, 3.6% unemployment, 32% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Medford Lakes sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Toms River, NJ · 166d · ~$16.0k all-in ($96/day) · score 6.8 Toms River Trenton, NJ · 179d · ~$18.6k all-in ($104/day) · score 8.2 Trenton Camden, NJ · 185d · ~$17.8k all-in ($96/day) · score 8.3 Camden Lakewood, NJ · 164d · ~$18.1k all-in ($111/day) · score 7.5 Lakewood Vineland, NJ · 167d · ~$17.0k all-in ($102/day) · score 7.6 Vineland New Brunswick, NJ · 171d · ~$15.6k all-in ($91/day) · score 8 New Brunswick Newark, NJ · 165d · ~$16.3k all-in ($99/day) · score 9 Newark Jersey City, NJ · 163d · ~$18.6k all-in ($114/day) · score 8.3 Jersey City Paterson, NJ · 185d · ~$17.8k all-in ($96/day) · score 8.9 Paterson Elizabeth, NJ · 165d · ~$16.5k all-in ($100/day) · score 8.2 Elizabeth Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Medford Lakes
Medford Lakes · 189d · ~$18.3k all-in ($97/day) · score 6.9 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Medford Lakes, NJ

Landlording in Medford Lakes, New Jersey, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The Eviction Risk Score is 6.9/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Medford Lakes is a city of 4,297 residents where 10.0% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 31.9% of income on rent. At an average rent of $2,211/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Medford Lakes eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 6.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Medford Lakes closes 189 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Medford Lakes's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 3.7/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Medford Lakes runs $11,033 to $25,608 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 189 days of typical timeline and $2,211/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.6/10 in Medford Lakes, and the city has limited rent control exposure (5.4/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In New Jersey, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Medford Lakes: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match New Jersey's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $25,608 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Medford Lakes

Trap · 19.5 POINTS
Politically, Burlington County voted Democratic by 19.5 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with tenant-protective legislative pressure. Combined with 31.9% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of NJSA 2A:18-61.1 Anti-Eviction Act.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What are the common reasons an eviction gets dismissed in Medford Lakes?

Evictions in New Jersey often get dismissed due to improper notice (wrong timeframe, incorrect information), failure to prove "just cause," or procedural errors in filing court documents. Judges are very strict on landlord compliance with the Anti-Eviction Act. It's why hiring an attorney is usually a must here.

Q2

Can I raise the rent whenever I want in Medford Lakes?

No, not entirely. While Medford Lakes itself doesn't have local rent control, New Jersey has statewide rules. Rent increases must be "reasonable" and cannot be retaliatory. For month-to-month tenancies, proper notice (usually 30 days) is required. For lease renewals, the terms of the lease govern. See our New Jersey rent control rules for more specifics.

Q3

Do I have to accept a tenant with a Section 8 voucher in New Jersey?

Yes, New Jersey has statewide source-of-income protection. This means you cannot refuse to rent to a tenant solely because they use a Section 8 voucher or other legal forms of rental assistance. You can still screen them based on other criteria like credit history, rental history, and income (their portion), but not on the source of their income itself.

Q4

What happens if a tenant files for bankruptcy during an eviction?

If a tenant files for bankruptcy, an "automatic stay" is immediately put in place, halting all eviction proceedings. You cannot continue with the eviction without first getting permission from the bankruptcy court. This is a complex legal situation where you absolutely need an attorney specializing in both landlord-tenant and bankruptcy law.

Q5

Can I evict a tenant for property damage in Medford Lakes?

Yes, property damage beyond normal wear and tear is a just cause for eviction under New Jersey law. You would typically need to provide a notice to cease the damaging behavior, and if it continues, then a notice of termination. Documenting the damage with photos, videos, and repair estimates is crucial evidence for court. For broader context on tenant rights, consult our New Jersey tenant protections page.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.9/10 places Medford Lakes in the 31st percentile of New Jersey cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.