Van Aken District Eviction Risk: Lower , Shaker Heights
Tract 39035183501 · Cuyahoga County, OH · pop 3,323 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
With a score of 3/10, tract 39035183501 in the Van Aken District area of Shaker Heights, OH reads lower for landlord eviction risk. Cost burden runs 29% here against 43.0% across Cuyahoga County.
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Risk heat across Shaker Heights and the region
Centroid at 41.4697, -81.5400 · click any tract to drill in
Why Van Aken District scores 3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyHow Van Aken District compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.SVI percentile: 69
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 27%Socioeconomic
- 89%Household composition
- 68%Racial/ethnic minority
- 88%Housing & transportation
HOLC grade: A: Best
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade A meant wealthy, predominantly white neighborhoods favored for lending. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 62%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 0%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 337Total filings over 12 yrs
- 3.76%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.5%Peak (2013)
- 19Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Van Aken District. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 8.8%Housing insecurity
- 6.7%Utility-shutoff threat
- 10.1%Food insecurity
- 7.6%SNAP enrollment
- 5.8%Transit barriers
- 5.1%No health insurance
- 12.8%Frequent mental distress
- 25.8%Any disability
What drives eviction risk in Van Aken District
The main counterweight is economic stress at 1/10. 67% of occupied units are rented, so comparables are plentiful and vacancy risk is low, but a mispriced renewal loses the tenant to a building nearby.
On the high side, court filing pressure reads 8.2/10. It sits 1.6 points below the Cuyahoga County average of 4.6.
Running hot, tenant-organizing strength reads 8.1/10. 14% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears.
Average gross rent is $1,390, 19% above the Shaker Heights average. Court records carry 337 eviction filings across 12 observed years. The voucher gap is 15.1%: households holding assistance that local rents will not absorb, which surfaces as churn rather than arrears.
Food insecurity runs 10.1% against 17.8% nationally. SNAP participation runs 7.6% against 15.2% nationally. The worst year on record was 2013, when 4.5% of renter households were served.
This ground was mapped A ("Best") on the 1930s HOLC security maps for Cleveland. That grading determined who could get a mortgage, and its imprint on tenure and rent burden is still visible in the ACS data above. In a typical year about 3.8% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 20% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
About tract 39035183501
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39035183501?
What is the average rent in tract 39035183501?
What is the poverty rate in tract 39035183501?
How socially vulnerable is tract 39035183501?
Is tract 39035183501 considered part of Van Aken District?
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39035183501?
What share of households in tract 39035183501 struggle to pay rent?
How does tract 39035183501 compare to Shaker Heights overall?
Was tract 39035183501 historically redlined?
Highest-risk tracts in Shaker Heights
Top eight tracts in Shaker Heights ranked by composite eviction-risk score.