Within neighborhood
60
th percentile
Elevated
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,618 of 84,120 nationally
Fruitland Park Eviction Risk: Moderate , Painesville
Tract 39085204400 · Lake County, OH · pop 3,282 · neighborhood within 1.2 mi
39085204400 is a census tract in the Fruitland Park area of Painesville, OH. It scores 5.9/10 for landlords. Population here is 3,282. Severe burden reaches 57%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate.
Risk score
5.9
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 34%
Stable renters 16%
Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units1,398
Renter share50.2%
SVI overall0.86
Poverty rate28.0%
Median income$43,929
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
25
th percentile
Low
Within county
97
th percentile
Very High
Within state
94
th percentile
Very High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Painesville and the region
Centroid at 41.7234, -81.2356 · click any tract to drill in
Why Fruitland Park scores 5.9
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Painesville
4.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.3
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
28.0% poverty · this tract
7.0
Supply constraint
$925 rent vs county FMR
2.7
Rent control risk
Inherited from Painesville
7.0
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
1.9
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Painesville
9.2
Housing court bias
Inherited from Painesville
7.7
How Fruitland Park compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 86
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 88%Socioeconomic
- 91%Household composition
- 46%Racial/ethnic minority
- 68%Housing & transportation
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 616Total filings over 14 yrs
- 6.78%Avg annual filing rate
- 12.1%Peak (2008)
- 44Filings in 2017 (latest validated)
Filings climbed 38% over the past 14 months.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Fruitland Park. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress
Eviction-adjacent indicators
Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.
- 17.8%Housing insecurity
- 12.6%Utility-shutoff threat
- 23.6%Food insecurity
- 20.7%SNAP enrollment
- 11.9%Transit barriers
- 15.4%No health insurance
- 19.6%Frequent mental distress
- 35.7%Any disability
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Fruitland Park
Against Lake County at 36.8%, 69% of renters here are cost-burdened. The score leans hardest on tenant-organizing strength at 9.2/10.
Against the Lake County average of 3.8, this tract reads riskier for landlords by 2.1 points. The poverty rate is 28%, which in this model reads as reduced rent-recovery odds after a judgment. On the softer side, eviction-process difficulty reads 1.9/10.
Sitting well above the midpoint, housing-court posture reads 7.7/10. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 616 filings here across 14 tracked years.
Average gross rent is $925, 11% below the Painesville average. Filings peaked in 2008 at 12.1% of renter households. In a typical year about 6.8% of renter households face a filing.
On the national scale it lands near the 77th percentile of the 84,120 tracts scored. Social vulnerability reads 8.8/10 on the CDC index, a measure of exposure to housing and economic shocks. Statewide the OH average is 4.2, so this tract runs 1.7 points hotter.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 39085204400
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39085204400?
Census tract 39085204400 in the Fruitland Park neighborhood scores 5.9/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 39085204400?
Median gross rent is $925/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 69% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 39085204400?
28.0% of residents in tract 39085204400 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,282.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 39085204400?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 86th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 88th, household 91th, minority 46th, housing 68th.
Q5
Is tract 39085204400 considered part of Fruitland Park?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39085204400 fall within Fruitland Park (neighborhood centroid within 1.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 39085204400?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 616 eviction filings across 14 validated years in tract 39085204400 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 6.78% of renter households, peaking at 12.1% in 2008. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
What share of households in tract 39085204400 struggle to pay rent?
About 17.8% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 12.6% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q8
How does tract 39085204400 compare to Painesville overall?
Tract 39085204400 scores 5.9/10, higher than the parent city of Painesville at 4.5/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Painesville; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Painesville
Top eight tracts in Painesville ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Related