Skip to content
Poland, Ohio eviction risk overview
City brief · 2,357 residents

Poland, OH Eviction Risk: LOW

Mahoning County · Population 2,357

In 2026
Risk score
3.6
LOW

49th percentile, Ohio.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average3.0 Now3.6
10 5 1976 · score 1.9 1977 · score 1.9 1978 · score 2.0 1979 · score 2.1 1980 · score 1.9 1981 · score 2.0 1982 · score 2.0 1983 · score 1.9 1984 · score 1.8 1985 · score 1.8 1986 · score 1.8 1987 · score 1.8 1988 · score 2.0 1989 · score 2.0 1990 · score 2.1 1991 · score 2.1 1992 · score 2.5 1993 · score 2.5 1994 · score 2.5 1995 · score 2.5 1996 · score 2.7 1997 · score 2.8 1998 · score 2.8 1999 · score 2.8 2000 · score 3.0 2001 · score 3.1 2002 · score 3.1 2003 · score 3.1 2004 · score 3.2 2005 · score 3.3 2006 · score 3.3 2007 · score 3.4 2008 · score 3.6 2009 · score 3.7 2010 · score 3.7 2011 · score 3.8 2012 · score 3.7 2013 · score 3.8 2014 · score 3.9 2015 · score 4.0 2016 · score 3.6 2017 · score 3.7 2018 · score 3.8 2019 · score 4.0 2020 · score 4.4 2021 · score 4.4 2022 · score 4.5 2023 · score 4.5 2024 · score 4.3 2025 · score 5.1 2026 · score 3.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.4 Regional 5.4 State 2.4 Economic 3.9 Supply 5.1 Rent Control 7.5 Eviction 2.1 Tenant 3.4 Housing 4.9 3.6 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +9.4% (2024)
    5.4
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.4
  3. State political climate
    Ohio legislature & governorship
    2.4
  4. Economic stress
    2.6% poverty · 3.8% unemp.
    3.9
  5. Supply constraint
    $953 average · 12.5% renters
    5.1
  6. Rent Control risk
    40.5% of income on rent
    7.5
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    38 days filing → judgment
    2.1
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    12.5% renters
    3.4
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    4.9
Geographic context

Risk heat across Poland and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Poland compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Mahoning County
Very Low
#17 of 18 cities
Rank in county, 6th percentileBottomTop
#17 of 18 cities in Mahoning County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Ohio
Moderate
#686 of 1,251 cities
Rank in state, 45th percentileBottomTop
#686 of 1,251 cities in Ohio for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Poland risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Poland: 3.63.6PolandThis cityCounty: 5.25.2Countyavg in countyState: 4.64.6Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.25.2U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 3.6
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 3.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.7 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 38d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $953/mo. A contested eviction takes 38 days and costs $1,517-$3,962 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 12.5%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 2,357 residents, 12.5% rent. 41% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 2.6% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.4
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.4 and 5.4 (GOP margin +9.4% (2024)). State climate at 2.4, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.4
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.4/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.1, housing court bias 4.9, rent-control risk 7.5. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.9 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 3.9
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 3.9. Supply constraint: 5.1. The numbers behind those: 2.6% poverty, 3.8% unemployment, 41% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Poland sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Akron, OH · 43d · ~$2.8k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.9 Akron Canton, OH · 45d · ~$2.9k all-in ($65/day) · score 5.4 Canton Youngstown, OH · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 5.6 Youngstown Columbus, OH · 38d · ~$2.7k all-in ($72/day) · score 5 Columbus Cleveland, OH · 39d · ~$3.1k all-in ($80/day) · score 5.5 Cleveland Cincinnati, OH · 37d · ~$2.8k all-in ($75/day) · score 5.2 Cincinnati Toledo, OH · 45d · ~$3.0k all-in ($67/day) · score 5 Toledo Dayton, OH · 38d · ~$2.6k all-in ($67/day) · score 4.5 Dayton Parma, OH · 42d · ~$2.9k all-in ($70/day) · score 5.5 Parma Lorain, OH · 45d · ~$2.8k all-in ($62/day) · score 5.4 Lorain Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.7 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.9 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.6 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 5.5 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 6.8 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.3 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 6.2 Seattle Poland
Poland · 38d · ~$2.7k all-in ($72/day) · score 3.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0-4   4-7   7-10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Poland, OH

Landlording in Poland, Ohio, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 3.6/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Poland is a city of 2,357 residents where 12.5% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 40.5% of income on rent. At an average rent of $953/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Poland eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.1/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Poland closes 38 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Poland's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 4.9/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Poland runs $1,517 to $3,962 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1-2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 38 days of typical timeline and $953/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 3.4/10 in Poland, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (7.5/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Ohio, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Poland: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Ohio's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,962 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Poland

Trap · 4.9/10
For landlords, the 5.1/10 score is most actionable when combined with Mahoning County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 4.9/10. Use proactive screening and documented notices.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Poland, OH without going to court?

No. You cannot physically remove a tenant, change locks, or shut off utilities to force them out. This is illegal self-help eviction. You must follow the court process outlined in ORC § 5321 to legally regain possession of your property.
Q2

How much notice do I need to give for a rent increase in Poland, OH?

Ohio law doesn't specify a notice period for rent increases for month-to-month tenancies, but 30 days is generally considered reasonable and good practice. For a fixed-term lease, you can only increase rent after the lease term ends, typically with a new lease agreement.
Q3

What if my tenant claims I haven't made repairs? Can they withhold rent?

No, tenants in Ohio generally cannot just withhold rent for repairs. They must follow a specific legal process outlined in ORC § 5321.07, which involves written notice to you, waiting a reasonable time, and potentially depositing rent with the court. If they unilaterally withhold rent, you can still proceed with a 3-day pay-or-quit notice.
Q4

Do I need an attorney for every eviction in Mahoning County?

While not legally required for every step, it is highly recommended you consult or hire an attorney for an eviction in Poland, OH. The legal process is complex, and mistakes can be costly, leading to delays or even dismissal of your case. Given the typical cost range of $1,517, $3,962, a good attorney is often cheaper than a botched eviction. Our Mahoning County eviction guide has more.
Q5

What are "tenant protections" in Ohio that I should be aware of?

Ohio law protects tenants from discrimination, retaliatory evictions, and requires landlords to maintain safe and habitable premises. While there's no statewide just-cause eviction or source-of-income protection, you must still adhere to fair housing laws. Always consult Ohio tenant protections for updates.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 3.6/10 places Poland in the 49th percentile of Ohio cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.