Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,930 of 84,120 nationally

Lansdowne Eviction Risk: Elevated , Youngstown

Tract 39099800501 · Mahoning County, OH · pop 2,124 · neighborhood within 0.2 mi

Tract 39099800501 covers Lansdowne in Youngstown in Ohio. Home to 2,124 residents, it scores 6.7/10 on landlord eviction risk. That is riskier than about 90% of US census tracts.

About 43% of renters carry a rent burden of 30% of income or higher, a severe level, and 13% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $321 monthly, set against $15,469 in average yearly household income, roughly 25% of income at the averages. About 72% of occupied units are renter-occupied, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
6
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 31% Stable renters 41% Owners 28%
Tract context
Occupied units803
Renter share72.2%
SVI overall0.93
Poverty rate74.9%
Median income$15,469

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 2 tracts In Lansdowne
Very High
Within parent city
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 31 tracts In Youngstown
Very High
Within county
100 th percentile
Rank, 100th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 75 tracts In Mahoning County
Very High
Within state
97 th percentile
Rank, 97th percentileLowHigh
#93 of 3,162 tracts In Ohio
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Youngstown and the region

Centroid at 41.1206, -80.6242 · click any tract to drill in

Why Lansdowne scores 6

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Youngstown
5.4
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
4.9
State political climate
Ohio legislature & governorship
2.4
Economic stress
74.9% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
$321 rent vs county FMR
1.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Youngstown
7.8
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
2.7
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Youngstown
8.6
Housing court bias
Inherited from Youngstown
8.6

How Lansdowne compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Lansdowne risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 6.06.0This tracttract 800501Youngstown: 3.23.2Youngstownparent cityCounty: 4.34.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 3.73.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 93

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Lansdowne. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

CDC PLACES 2023 · health & economic stress

Eviction-adjacent indicators

Crude prevalence of conditions linked to housing loss. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh), 2023 model-based small-area estimates.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Lansdowne

The score leans hardest on economic stress at $1/10. That part is specific to this tract, computed from its own rent, income, and poverty figures. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Youngstown eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores above the Mahoning County average of 5.8 and above the Ohio statewide average of 5.1. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 88% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

The tract is Hispanic or Latino and Black and ranks around the 93rd percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. High vulnerability tends to track with higher eviction-filing rates when rents climb.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 39099800501

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 39099800501?

Census tract 39099800501 in the Lansdowne neighborhood scores 6/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 39099800501?

Median gross rent is $321/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 43% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 39099800501?

74.9% of residents in tract 39099800501 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,124.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 39099800501?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 93th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 94th, household 98th, minority 87th, housing 52th.
Q5

Is tract 39099800501 considered part of Lansdowne?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 39099800501 fall within Lansdowne (neighborhood centroid within 0.2 miles, OSM data).
Q6

What share of households in tract 39099800501 struggle to pay rent?

About 42.0% of adults in this tract reported housing insecurity (could not pay rent or mortgage in the past 12 months), per the CDC PLACES 2023 model-based small-area estimate. 38.3% also reported utility shutoff threats, a frequent precursor to eviction filings.
Q7

How does tract 39099800501 compare to Youngstown overall?

Tract 39099800501 scores 6/10, higher than the parent city of Youngstown at 3.2/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Youngstown eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 39099800501 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 88% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Youngstown

Top eight tracts in Youngstown ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related