Skip to content
Rosemount, Ohio eviction risk overview
City brief · 2,199 residents

Rosemount, OH Eviction Risk: LOW

Scioto County · Population 2,199

In 2026
Risk score
2.6
LOW

76th percentile, Ohio.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.8 Average2.6 Now2.6
4.0 1.8 1976 · score 2.5 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.4 1979 · score 2.4 1980 · score 2.5 1981 · score 2.5 1982 · score 2.5 1983 · score 2.4 1984 · score 2.3 1985 · score 2.3 1986 · score 2.2 1987 · score 2.2 1988 · score 2.1 1989 · score 1.8 1990 · score 1.8 1991 · score 1.9 1992 · score 2.4 1993 · score 2.4 1994 · score 2.3 1995 · score 2.3 1996 · score 2.5 1997 · score 2.5 1998 · score 2.5 1999 · score 2.6 2000 · score 2.5 2001 · score 2.5 2002 · score 2.6 2003 · score 2.6 2004 · score 2.7 2005 · score 2.7 2006 · score 2.7 2007 · score 2.7 2008 · score 3.0 2009 · score 3.3 2010 · score 3.3 2011 · score 3.2 2012 · score 3.1 2013 · score 3.1 2014 · score 3.0 2015 · score 3.1 2016 · score 3.0 2017 · score 3.0 2018 · score 2.9 2019 · score 2.8 2020 · score 3.9 2021 · score 4.0 2022 · score 3.0 2023 · score 2.7 2024 · score 2.6 2025 · score 2.6 2026 · score 2.6

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.6 Regional 3.6 State 2.4 Economic 6.0 Supply 5.4 Rent Control 9.6 Eviction 2.3 Tenant 5.6 Housing 7.8 2.6 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +48.0% (2024)
    3.6
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.6
  3. State political climate
    Ohio legislature & governorship
    2.4
  4. Economic stress
    12.4% poverty · 4.2% unemp.
    6.0
  5. Supply constraint
    $975 average · 25.9% renters
    5.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    51.0% of income on rent
    9.6
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    45 days filing → judgment
    2.3
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    25.9% renters
    5.6
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.8
Geographic context

Risk heat across Rosemount and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Rosemount compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Scioto County
Elevated
#6 of 16 cities
Rank in county, 67th percentileLowHigh
#6 of 16 cities in Scioto County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Ohio
Elevated
#389 of 1,251 cities
Rank in state, 69th percentileLowHigh
#389 of 1,251 cities in Ohio for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Rosemount risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Rosemount: 2.62.6RosemountThis cityCounty: 2.72.7Countyavg in countyState: 2.82.8Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.6
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.6/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.1 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 45d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $975/mo. A contested eviction takes 45 days and costs $1,307–$3,854 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 25.9%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 2,199 residents, 25.9% rent. 51% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 12.4% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.6 and 3.6 (GOP margin +48.0% (2024)). State climate at 2.4, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.4
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.4/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.3, housing court bias 7.8, rent-control risk 9.6. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.7 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6. Supply constraint: 5.4. The numbers behind those: 12.4% poverty, 4.2% unemployment, 51% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Rosemount sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Columbus, OH · 38d · ~$2.7k all-in ($72/day) · score 3.1 Columbus Cleveland, OH · 39d · ~$3.1k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.7 Cleveland Cincinnati, OH · 37d · ~$2.8k all-in ($75/day) · score 3.4 Cincinnati Toledo, OH · 45d · ~$3.0k all-in ($67/day) · score 3.3 Toledo Akron, OH · 43d · ~$2.8k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.4 Akron Dayton, OH · 38d · ~$2.6k all-in ($67/day) · score 3.4 Dayton Parma, OH · 42d · ~$2.9k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.8 Parma Canton, OH · 45d · ~$2.9k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.8 Canton Lorain, OH · 45d · ~$2.8k all-in ($62/day) · score 2.9 Lorain Hamilton, OH · 45d · ~$2.9k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.8 Hamilton Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Rosemount
Rosemount · 45d · ~$2.6k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.6 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Rosemount, OH

Landlording in Rosemount, Ohio, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 2.6/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Rosemount is a city of 2,199 residents where 25.9% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 51.0% of income on rent. At an average rent of $975/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Rosemount eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.3/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Rosemount closes 45 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Rosemount's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.8/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Rosemount runs $1,307 to $3,854 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 45 days of typical timeline and $975/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 5.6/10 in Rosemount, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (9.6/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Ohio, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Rosemount: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Ohio's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,854 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Rosemount

Trap · 42.2 POINTS
Politically, Scioto County voted Republican by 42.2 points in 2020, a baseline that correlates with landlord-neutral legislative pressure. Combined with 51.0% rent-to-income ratio, expect baseline enforcement of ORC 1923 + 5321.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

Can I evict a tenant in Rosemount for no reason?

Ohio does not have a statewide just-cause eviction requirement. This means you can generally terminate a month-to-month tenancy for any non-discriminatory reason by providing a 30-day notice. For fixed-term leases, you must wait until the lease expires unless the tenant violates a lease term. However, you can't evict in retaliation or for discriminatory reasons.

Q2

How long does it take to get a court date for an eviction in Scioto County?

After you file a Forcible Entry and Detainer action, the court typically schedules a hearing within 7-10 days. This is just the first hearing; the entire process, including any appeals or sheriff lockouts, usually takes around 45 days.

Q3

What if my tenant pays partial rent after I serve the 3-day notice?

Accepting partial rent after serving a 3-day pay-or-quit notice can be tricky. It can be seen as waiving your right to evict based on that notice. If you accept a partial payment, you likely need to serve a new 3-day notice for the remaining balance or risk having your case dismissed in court. Consult an attorney before accepting any partial payments once the eviction process has begun.

Q4

Is there rent control in Rosemount, OH?

No, Ohio has a statewide ban on rent control. This means cities like Rosemount cannot implement rent control ordinances. You are generally free to set your rental prices based on market conditions. For more information, see our Ohio rent control rules.

Q5

Can I keep a tenant's security deposit for cleaning or minor repairs?

You can keep a portion of the security deposit for damages beyond normal wear and tear, unpaid rent, or utility bills. You cannot deduct for normal wear and tear (e.g., faded paint, worn carpet). You must provide an itemized list of deductions to the tenant within 30 days of them vacating the property and providing a forwarding address. Failure to do so can result in penalties.

Q6

When should I hire an attorney for an eviction in Rosemount?

While you can handle some steps yourself, it's highly recommended to consult an attorney as soon as you anticipate an eviction, ideally before filing in court. They can ensure your notices are correct, represent you in court, and navigate any tenant defenses. Given the typical eviction cost range of $1,307, $3,854, avoiding a mistake that delays the process by even a few weeks can easily justify the attorney's fee in saved rent and hassle.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.6/10 places Rosemount in the 76th percentile of Ohio cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.