Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #19,562 of 84,120 nationally

Ladd's Addition Eviction Risk: Moderate , Portland

Tract 41051002102 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 2,139 · neighborhood within 1.1 mi

Census tract 41051002102 covers the Ladd's Addition neighborhood of Portland, home to 2,139 residents. For landlords it grades 6.9/10, an elevated reading. That is riskier than roughly 93% of the 84,120 US census tracts we score.

Rent eats 30% or more of income for 50% of renter households, a severe level, and 21% are severely burdened at 50% or more. Average gross rent is $1,500 monthly, set against $63,750 in average yearly household income, roughly 28% of income at the averages. Renters make up 95% of occupied homes, a renter-majority tract.

Risk score
5.4
Moderate
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 47% Stable renters 47% Owners 6%
Tract context
Occupied units1,655
Renter share94.8%
SVI overall0.31
Poverty rate4.8%
Median income$63,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
67 th percentile
Rank, 67th percentileLowHigh
#2 of 4 tracts In Ladd's Addition
Elevated
Within parent city
51 th percentile
Rank, 51st percentileLowHigh
#83 of 168 tracts In Portland
Moderate
Within county
53 th percentile
Rank, 53rd percentileLowHigh
#94 of 197 tracts In Multnomah County
Moderate
Within state
68 th percentile
Rank, 68th percentileLowHigh
#320 of 994 tracts In Oregon
Elevated
Geographic context

Risk heat across Portland and the region

Centroid at 45.5244, -122.6494 · click any tract to drill in

Why Ladd's Addition scores 5.4

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
4.8% poverty · this tract
1.2
Supply constraint
$1,500 rent vs county FMR
2.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5

How Ladd's Addition compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Ladd's Addition risk score vs. parent city / county / stateThis tract: 5.45.4This tracttract 002102Portland: 8.18.1Portlandparent cityCounty: 5.35.3Countyavg tract in countyState: 4.74.7Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 31

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)

  • 407Total filings 2020-21
  • 5.3Avg monthly (observed)
  • 1.4Pre-pandemic baseline
  • 3.80×Ratio to baseline
Monthly filings 2020–2021 2020-01-01 to 2026-05-01
Monthly eviction filings vs pre-pandemic baseline2020-01-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-03-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2020-04-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-06-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-08-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-09-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-10-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2020-11-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2020-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2021-01-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2021-03-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-04-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-05-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-06-01: 1 filings (10.00× baseline)2021-07-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-08-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2021-09-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2021-10-01: 1 filings (0.50× baseline)2021-11-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2021-12-01: 1 filings (0.33× baseline)2022-01-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-02-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-03-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-04-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-05-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2022-06-01: 5 filings (50.00× baseline)2022-07-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2022-08-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2022-09-01: 2 filings (1.00× baseline)2022-10-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2022-11-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2022-12-01: 4 filings (1.33× baseline)2023-01-01: 7 filings (7.00× baseline)2023-02-01: 1 filings (1.00× baseline)2023-03-01: 0 filings (0.00× baseline)2023-04-01: 7 filings (7.00× baseline)2023-05-01: 5 filings (5.00× baseline)2023-06-01: 3 filings (30.00× baseline)2023-07-01: 5 filings (2.50× baseline)2023-08-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2023-09-01: 3 filings (1.50× baseline)2023-10-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2023-11-01: 7 filings (7.00× baseline)2023-12-01: 5 filings (1.67× baseline)2024-01-01: 6 filings (6.00× baseline)2024-02-01: 10 filings (10.00× baseline)2024-03-01: 13 filings (13.00× baseline)2024-04-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)2024-05-01: 18 filings (18.00× baseline)2024-06-01: 7 filings (70.00× baseline)2024-07-01: 13 filings (6.50× baseline)2024-08-01: 16 filings (8.00× baseline)2024-09-01: 4 filings (2.00× baseline)2024-10-01: 7 filings (3.50× baseline)2024-11-01: 13 filings (13.00× baseline)2024-12-01: 17 filings (5.67× baseline)2025-01-01: 9 filings (9.00× baseline)2025-02-01: 7 filings (7.00× baseline)2025-03-01: 14 filings (14.00× baseline)2025-04-01: 16 filings (16.00× baseline)2025-05-01: 15 filings (15.00× baseline)2025-06-01: 9 filings (90.00× baseline)2025-07-01: 6 filings (3.00× baseline)2025-08-01: 8 filings (4.00× baseline)2025-09-01: 14 filings (7.00× baseline)2025-10-01: 9 filings (4.50× baseline)2025-11-01: 2 filings (2.00× baseline)2025-12-01: 12 filings (4.00× baseline)2026-01-01: 4 filings (4.00× baseline)2026-02-01: 11 filings (11.00× baseline)2026-03-01: 15 filings (15.00× baseline)2026-04-01: 11 filings (11.00× baseline)2026-05-01: 3 filings (3.00× baseline)

Pandemic filings ran above baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.

Comparable tracts

Census tracts with similar eviction risk

Within Ladd's Addition. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Ladd's Addition

The score leans hardest on tenant organizing strength at $1/10. That part comes from the wider legal climate rather than the tract itself. Statewide and court-level factors such as eviction-process speed and rent-control exposure are inherited from Portland eviction risk, while the economic and supply signals are measured at the tract level.

Set against its neighbors, this tract scores about the same as the Multnomah County average of 6.9 and above the Oregon statewide average of 6.0. Within its own county it reads on the riskier side for landlords.

The tract is predominantly White and ranks around the 31st percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index, a measure of how exposed residents are to housing and economic shocks. That is a relatively low-vulnerability reading.

This tract overlaps land the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation redlined in the 1930s, a dominant grade of D ("Hazardous") across 72% of the tract. Redlining cut off mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class blocks, and those areas still tend to carry higher rent burden and eviction filings today.

For a landlord, this is a tract where process discipline pays off. Clean paperwork and steady screening keep the elevated risk manageable.

Frequently asked

About tract 41051002102

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051002102?

Census tract 41051002102 in the Ladd's Addition neighborhood scores 5.4/10 (Moderate tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the average rent in tract 41051002102?

Median gross rent is $1,500/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 50% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3

What is the poverty rate in tract 41051002102?

4.8% of residents in tract 41051002102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 2,139.
Q4

How socially vulnerable is tract 41051002102?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 31th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 39th, household 3th, minority 39th, housing 70th.
Q5

Is tract 41051002102 considered part of Ladd's Addition?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051002102 fall within Ladd's Addition (neighborhood centroid within 1.1 miles, OSM data).
Q6

Did eviction filings in tract 41051002102 drop during COVID?

Pandemic-era filings ran 3.80× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran above pre-pandemic norms. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q7

How does tract 41051002102 compare to Portland overall?

Tract 41051002102 scores 5.4/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 8.1/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q8

Was tract 41051002102 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 72% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Portland

Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related