Within neighborhood
0
th percentile
Very Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #12,481 of 84,120 nationally
Ladd's Addition Eviction Risk: Elevated , Portland
Tract 41051001000 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 5,841 · neighborhood within 0.7 mi
Census tract 41051001000 covers part of the Ladd's Addition area of Portland, OR, and scores 7.1/10 on landlord eviction risk. It is home to 5,841 residents. Against Multnomah County at 49.7%, roughly one in three of renters here are cost-burdened.
Risk score
7.1
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 19%
Stable renters 41%
Owners 40%
Tract context
Occupied units2,727
Renter share59.3%
SVI overall0.23
Poverty rate10.9%
Median income$104,432
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
38
th percentile
Low
Within county
43
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
74
th percentile
Elevated
Geographic context
Risk heat across Portland and the region
Centroid at 45.4979, -122.6498 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ladd's Addition scores 7.1
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
10.9% poverty · this tract
2.7
Supply constraint
$1,704 rent vs county FMR
3.5
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5
How Ladd's Addition compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 23
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 59%Socioeconomic
- 2%Household composition
- 36%Racial/ethnic minority
- 31%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 32%Grade C
- 18%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 552Total filings over 16 yrs
- 2.39%Avg annual filing rate
- 4.2%Peak (2000)
- 22Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 63% over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 170Total filings 2020-21
- 2.2Avg monthly (observed)
- 2.3Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.96×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ladd's Addition. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Ladd's Addition
The score leans hardest on local political climate at 9/10. Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10. Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10.
13% are severely burdened past the 50% mark. That cohort absorbs no shock: one repair bill or one cut shift converts straight into arrears. Court records carry 552 eviction filings across 16 observed years. The worst year on record was 2000, when 4.2% of renter households were served.
In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 2.4% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 85% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.1/10. Statewide the OR average is 6.1, so this tract runs 1.0 points hotter.
Of its three components the household composition measure is the least pressured. It tracks the Multnomah County average of 7.4 closely.
Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.
Frequently asked
About tract 41051001000
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051001000?
Census tract 41051001000 in the Ladd's Addition neighborhood scores 7.1/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 41051001000?
Median gross rent is $1,704/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 31% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 41051001000?
10.9% of residents in tract 41051001000 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 5,841.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 41051001000?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 23th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 59th, household 2th, minority 36th, housing 31th.
Q5
Is tract 41051001000 considered part of Ladd's Addition?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051001000 fall within Ladd's Addition (neighborhood centroid within 0.7 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051001000?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 552 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051001000 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.39% of renter households, peaking at 4.2% in 2000. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 41051001000 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.96× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 41051001000 compare to Portland overall?
Tract 41051001000 scores 7.1/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 41051001000 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 18% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Portland
Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OR
Powellhurst
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Portsmouth
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Jade District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Powellhurst
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Arleta
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Chinatown
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Glenfair
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
University District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Related