Within neighborhood
33
th percentile
Low
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,153 of 84,120 nationally
Ladd's Addition Eviction Risk: Elevated , Portland
Tract 41051001102 · Multnomah County, OR · pop 1,365 · neighborhood within 0.3 mi
41051001102 is a census tract in the Ladd's Addition area of Portland, OR. It scores 7.3/10 for landlords. Population here is 1,365. The severe-burden share is 29%, and it is the single best predictor in this model of a filing that actually reaches judgment.
Risk score
7.3
Elevated
Confidence 100% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 21%
Stable renters 29%
Owners 50%
Tract context
Occupied units699
Renter share49.8%
SVI overall0.30
Poverty rate12.1%
Median income$106,875
Percentile rank
Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.Within parent city
45
th percentile
Moderate
Within county
46
th percentile
Moderate
Within state
78
th percentile
High
Geographic context
Risk heat across Portland and the region
Centroid at 45.5086, -122.6560 · click any tract to drill in
Why Ladd's Addition scores 7.3
9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendlyLocal political climate
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
8.1
State political climate
Oregon legislature & governorship
7.2
Economic stress
12.1% poverty · this tract
3.0
Supply constraint
$1,842 rent vs county FMR
4.2
Rent control risk
Inherited from Portland
8.5
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
8.5
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Portland
9.0
Housing court bias
Inherited from Portland
8.5
How Ladd's Addition compares
Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.CDC Social Vulnerability Index
SVI percentile: 30
CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.
- 50%Socioeconomic
- 6%Household composition
- 35%Racial/ethnic minority
- 42%Housing & transportation
Historical context · 1930s redlining
HOLC grade: C: Definitely Declining
This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade C meant mixed-race / working-class neighborhoods rated as risky. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.
- 0%Grade A
- 0%Grade B
- 28%Grade C
- 0%Grade D · redlined
Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.
Eviction filings
Court-record eviction history
Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1
Historic baseline (2000–2018)
- 124Total filings over 16 yrs
- 2.10%Avg annual filing rate
- 5.6%Peak (2002)
- 1Filings in 2016 (latest validated)
Filings dropped 93% over the past 16 months.
Pandemic-era tracking (2020–2021)
- 35Total filings 2020-21
- 0.5Avg monthly (observed)
- 0.6Pre-pandemic baseline
- 0.71×Ratio to baseline
Pandemic filings ran below baseline. Eviction Lab tracked Pittsburgh, PA as part of its 34-metro Eviction Tracking System.
Comparable tracts
Census tracts with similar eviction risk
Within Ladd's Addition. Closest by Eviction Risk Score.
Analysis
What drives eviction risk in Ladd's Addition
What pushes it up most is local political climate at 9/10. On the high side, tenant-organizing strength reads 9/10.
Running hot, rent-regulation exposure reads 8.5/10. Against Multnomah County at 49.7%, 42% of renters here are cost-burdened. The filing record is not thin: 124 evictions over 16 years of observation.
Average gross rent is $1,842, 11% above the Portland average. The worst year on record was 2002, when 5.6% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground C ("Definitely Declining"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today.
In a typical year about 2.1% of renter households face a filing. That is riskier than roughly 87% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.
CDC social-vulnerability scoring puts the tract at 3.7/10.
These are ACS 5-year estimates; the score moves when the ACS, court-record, or statute inputs behind it move.
Frequently asked
About tract 41051001102
Q1
What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 41051001102?
Census tract 41051001102 in the Ladd's Addition neighborhood scores 7.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2
What is the average rent in tract 41051001102?
Median gross rent is $1,842/month (ACS 5-year 2023, table B25064). 42% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q3
What is the poverty rate in tract 41051001102?
12.1% of residents in tract 41051001102 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 1,365.
Q4
How socially vulnerable is tract 41051001102?
CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 30th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 50th, household 6th, minority 35th, housing 42th.
Q5
Is tract 41051001102 considered part of Ladd's Addition?
Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 41051001102 fall within Ladd's Addition (neighborhood centroid within 0.3 miles, OSM data).
Q6
How many evictions are filed each year in tract 41051001102?
Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 124 eviction filings across 16 validated years in tract 41051001102 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 2.10% of renter households, peaking at 5.6% in 2002. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q7
Did eviction filings in tract 41051001102 drop during COVID?
Pandemic-era filings ran 0.71× the pre-COVID monthly baseline. Filings ran modestly below normal. Tracked by the Eviction Lab Eviction Tracking System (Pittsburgh, PA), 2020-2021.
Q8
How does tract 41051001102 compare to Portland overall?
Tract 41051001102 scores 7.3/10, lower than the parent city of Portland at 7.7/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Portland eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q9
Was tract 41051001102 historically redlined?
Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of C. 0% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts
Highest-risk tracts in Portland
Top eight tracts in Portland ranked by composite eviction-risk score.
Tract · OR
Powellhurst
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Powellhurst
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Portsmouth
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Jade District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Chinatown
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Glenfair
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
Arleta
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Tract · OR
University District
9.1
/ 10 · Very High
Related