Skip to content
Laureldale, Pennsylvania eviction risk overview
City brief · 4,284 residents

Laureldale, PA Eviction Risk: MODERATE

Berks County · Population 4,284

In 2026
Risk score
4
MODERATE

73th percentile, Pennsylvania.

50-yr Eviction Risk Score history

1976 to 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.5 Average3.5 Now4
5.3 2.5 1976 · score 2.8 1977 · score 2.8 1978 · score 2.8 1979 · score 2.8 1980 · score 2.9 1981 · score 2.8 1982 · score 2.9 1983 · score 2.8 1984 · score 2.7 1985 · score 2.6 1986 · score 2.6 1987 · score 2.5 1988 · score 2.7 1989 · score 2.7 1990 · score 2.8 1991 · score 2.9 1992 · score 3.3 1993 · score 3.3 1994 · score 3.3 1995 · score 3.3 1996 · score 3.4 1997 · score 3.4 1998 · score 3.4 1999 · score 3.4 2000 · score 3.3 2001 · score 3.3 2002 · score 3.4 2003 · score 3.4 2004 · score 3.4 2005 · score 3.4 2006 · score 3.4 2007 · score 3.5 2008 · score 4.0 2009 · score 4.1 2010 · score 4.2 2011 · score 4.2 2012 · score 4.1 2013 · score 4.1 2014 · score 4.0 2015 · score 4.0 2016 · score 3.9 2017 · score 3.9 2018 · score 3.8 2019 · score 3.8 2020 · score 5.1 2021 · score 5.3 2022 · score 4.4 2023 · score 4.0 2024 · score 4.1 2025 · score 4.1 2026 · score 4.0

Key metrics

Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 5.1 Regional 5.1 State 3.4 Economic 6.8 Supply 6.0 Rent Control 8.9 Eviction 2.9 Tenant 4.5 Housing 7.4 4 MODERATE
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +12.2% (2024)
    5.1
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    5.1
  3. State political climate
    Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
    3.4
  4. Economic stress
    12.1% poverty · 6.8% unemp.
    6.8
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,516 average · 18.6% renters
    6.0
  6. Rent Control risk
    39.8% of income on rent
    8.9
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    63 days filing → judgment
    2.9
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    18.6% renters
    4.5
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.4
Geographic context

Risk heat across Laureldale and the region

Click any city to see its score

How Laureldale compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Berks County
High
#20 of 82 cities
Rank in county, 77th percentileLowHigh
#20 of 82 cities in Berks County for landlord eviction risk.
Rank in Pennsylvania
Elevated
#614 of 1,952 cities
Rank in state, 69th percentileLowHigh
#614 of 1,952 cities in Pennsylvania for landlord eviction risk.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Laureldale risk score vs. county / state / U.S.Laureldale: 4.04.0LaureldaleThis cityCounty: 4.04.0Countyavg in countyState: 4.34.3Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avg
Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 4
    / 10 · MODERATE
    The verdict

    A Moderate-tier market.

    Composite 4/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+1.2 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 63d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,516/mo. A contested eviction takes 63 days and costs $3,026–$7,294 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 18.6%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 4,284 residents, 18.6% rent. 40% are spending 30%+ income on rent, 12.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 5.1
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Mid-range climate. Not a coastal market.

    Local & regional political climate score 5.1 and 5.1 (GOP margin +12.2% (2024)). State climate at 3.4, a mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 3.4
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 3.4/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies, and it shows up in the process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.9, housing court bias 7.4, rent-control risk 8.9. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-2.1 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 6.8
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 6.8. Supply constraint: 6. The numbers behind those: 12.1% poverty, 6.8% unemployment, 40% of income on rent.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Laureldale sits in the slow & expensive quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Philadelphia, PA · 73d · ~$5.1k all-in ($70/day) · score 5.5 Philadelphia Allentown, PA · 70d · ~$5.5k all-in ($79/day) · score 5 Allentown Reading, PA · 71d · ~$5.2k all-in ($74/day) · score 4.4 Reading Bethlehem, PA · 66d · ~$5.0k all-in ($75/day) · score 4.2 Bethlehem Lancaster, PA · 71d · ~$5.6k all-in ($78/day) · score 4.1 Lancaster Pittsburgh, PA · 74d · ~$5.0k all-in ($68/day) · score 4.9 Pittsburgh Erie, PA · 67d · ~$4.8k all-in ($72/day) · score 4.8 Erie Scranton, PA · 74d · ~$5.2k all-in ($71/day) · score 4.1 Scranton Levittown, PA · 64d · ~$5.4k all-in ($85/day) · score 3.8 Levittown Harrisburg, PA · 63d · ~$5.4k all-in ($86/day) · score 4.3 Harrisburg Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 2.8 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 2.8 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.1 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.4 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 7.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 5.7 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 9.7 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 7.9 Seattle Laureldale
Laureldale · 63d · ~$5.2k all-in ($82/day) · score 4 National average: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Laureldale, PA

Landlording in Laureldale, Pennsylvania, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The Eviction Risk Score is 4/10 (MODERATE tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above, covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Laureldale is a city of 4,284 residents where 18.6% of occupied units are renter-occupied, and the typical renter spends 39.8% of income on rent. At an average rent of $1,516/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing, a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Laureldale eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.9/10, a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Laureldale closes 63 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Laureldale's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.4/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Laureldale runs $3,026 to $7,294 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice, common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 63 days of typical timeline and $1,516/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 4.5/10 in Laureldale, and the city sits at the top of the rent control risk spectrum (8.9/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5 to 3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks, but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In Pennsylvania, deposit cap and refund window are statute, so exceed them at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Laureldale: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a MODERATE tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one, since retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match Pennsylvania's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $7,294 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Laureldale

Trap · 18.6%
18.6% renter share against 4,284 residents produces roughly 795 rental occupants in Laureldale. Berks County voted R 8.2% in 2020. Eviction filings tend to cluster in the multifamily rental corridor.
04Eviction filings

Live filings tracking · Eviction Lab

Princeton Eviction Lab Tracking System, state-level (no county tracker available). Last update 2026-05-01.

In the most recent month, 8,054 eviction cases were filed across the tracker's coverage area, 0.94× the historical baseline (below baseline). Past 12 months: 108,576 filings. Pandemic-era cumulative: 577,537.

  • 8,054Past month
  • 108,576Past 12 months
  • 0.94×vs baseline (past mo)
Notice requirement: at least ten days notice (in some cases more). Filing fee: $162 filing fee on average.
Last 36 months of filings 2023-05-01 – 2026-04-01
Monthly eviction filings (Eviction Lab tracker)2023-05-01: 9,577 filings (1.00× hist)2023-06-01: 9,891 filings (1.03× hist)2023-07-01: 10,003 filings (0.96× hist)2023-08-01: 10,465 filings (1.02× hist)2023-09-01: 9,575 filings (0.98× hist)2023-10-01: 10,399 filings (1.00× hist)2023-11-01: 9,207 filings (1.03× hist)2023-12-01: 9,071 filings (1.00× hist)2024-01-01: 10,122 filings (1.00× hist)2024-02-01: 9,955 filings (1.04× hist)2024-03-01: 8,099 filings (0.95× hist)2024-04-01: 9,091 filings (1.06× hist)2024-05-01: 9,628 filings (1.00× hist)2024-06-01: 9,281 filings (0.97× hist)2024-07-01: 10,746 filings (1.04× hist)2024-08-01: 10,125 filings (0.98× hist)2024-09-01: 10,028 filings (1.02× hist)2024-10-01: 10,476 filings (1.00× hist)2024-11-01: 8,730 filings (0.97× hist)2024-12-01: 9,142 filings (1.00× hist)2025-01-01: 10,277 filings (1.02× hist)2025-02-01: 8,978 filings (0.96× hist)2025-03-01: 8,364 filings (0.98× hist)2025-04-01: 8,144 filings (0.95× hist)2025-05-01: 9,149 filings (0.95× hist)2025-06-01: 9,156 filings (0.96× hist)2025-07-01: 10,419 filings (1.00× hist)2025-08-01: 9,322 filings (0.91× hist)2025-09-01: 9,697 filings (0.99× hist)2025-10-01: 9,676 filings (0.93× hist)2025-11-01: 7,697 filings (0.86× hist)2025-12-01: 9,112 filings (1.00× hist)2026-01-01: 9,436 filings (0.94× hist)2026-02-01: 8,400 filings (0.90× hist)2026-03-01: 8,458 filings (0.99× hist)2026-04-01: 8,054 filings (0.94× hist)
Filings dropped 12% over the past 12 months.
05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What happens if my Laureldale tenant leaves some belongings after an eviction?

In Pennsylvania, you generally have a responsibility to store a tenant's abandoned property for a certain period, usually 10-30 days, and notify them. If they don't claim it, you can dispose of it. Document everything, including inventory and photos, to protect yourself from claims later. Do not immediately throw out their possessions.

Q2

Can I turn off utilities if my tenant isn't paying rent in Laureldale?

Absolutely not. This is considered an illegal "self-help" eviction tactic in Pennsylvania and can result in significant penalties, including fines and damages owed to the tenant. You must follow the legal eviction process through the courts.

Q3

Is it worth it to offer a payment plan to a tenant who can't pay in Laureldale?

It can be, but proceed with extreme caution and get it in writing. If you offer a payment plan, clearly state the terms, and what happens if they miss a payment. However, if you've already started the eviction process, accepting partial payments can complicate or invalidate your existing notices. Consult an attorney before agreeing to a payment plan during an active eviction. Sometimes it's better to get them out and find a new, paying tenant.

Q4

How often should I raise rent in Laureldale?

Pennsylvania does not have rent control, so you can raise rent to market rates. Given Laureldale's average rent of $1,516/month and a rent-to-income ratio of 39.8%, be mindful of affordability. Annual increases are common, but always provide proper notice (typically 30-60 days before the lease renewal, as specified in your lease). Don't raise it so high that you struggle to find new tenants or force out good ones.

Q5

What if my Laureldale tenant files for bankruptcy during the eviction process?

If your tenant files for bankruptcy, an "automatic stay" is immediately put in place, which halts all collection activities, including evictions. You must stop the eviction process immediately and consult an attorney specializing in bankruptcy law. Trying to continue an eviction after a bankruptcy filing can lead to serious legal consequences for you.

06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 4/10 places Laureldale in the 73rd percentile of Pennsylvania cities on the Eviction Risk Score index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1 to 10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976, a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.