Skip to content
Neighborhood · Ranked #11,153 of 84,120 nationally

Riverside Eviction Risk: Elevated , Harrisburg

Tract 42043021100 · Dauphin County, PA · pop 3,245 · neighborhood within 0.8 mi

Tract 42043021100 sits in the Riverside area of Harrisburg eviction risk, PA, carrying an eviction-risk score of 7.3/10. It is home to 3,245 residents. The dominant input is economic stress at 10/10.

Risk score
7.3
Elevated
Confidence 85% · 1–10 scale
Household mix · 100 hh
Burdened renters 30% Stable renters 35% Owners 35%
Tract context
Occupied units1,242
Renter share64.9%
SVI overall0.98
Poverty rate53.2%
Median income$33,750

Percentile rank

Higher percentile = riskier than more peers.
Within neighborhood
50 th percentile
Rank, 50th percentileLowHigh
#1 of 1 tracts In Riverside
Moderate
Within parent city
62 th percentile
Rank, 62nd percentileLowHigh
#6 of 14 tracts In Harrisburg
Elevated
Within county
91 th percentile
Rank, 91st percentileLowHigh
#7 of 67 tracts In Dauphin County
Very High
Within state
94 th percentile
Rank, 94th percentileLowHigh
#207 of 3,445 tracts In Pennsylvania
Very High
Geographic context

Risk heat across Harrisburg and the region

Centroid at 40.2982, -76.8854 · click any tract to drill in

Why Riverside scores 7.3

9 axes · 1 = landlord-friendly
Local political climate
Inherited from Harrisburg
5.9
Regional political climate
2024 county presidential margin
5.4
State political climate
Pennsylvania legislature & governorship
3.4
Economic stress
53.2% poverty · this tract
10.0
Supply constraint
tract rent vs county FMR
5.0
Rent control risk
Inherited from Harrisburg
5.2
Eviction process difficulty
State law sets the calendar
3.2
Tenant organizing strength
Inherited from Harrisburg
9.7
Housing court bias
Inherited from Harrisburg
7.1

How Riverside compares

Risk score vs. parent city, county, state.
Riverside risk score vs. parent city / county / state7.3This tracttract 0211005.9Harrisburgparent city4.6Countyavg tract in county4.6Stateavg tract in state
CDC Social Vulnerability Index

SVI percentile: 98

CDC/ATSDR 2022. Higher = more vulnerable. National percentile across 84k tracts.

Historical context · 1930s redlining

HOLC grade: D: Hazardous (Redlined)

This tract sits within an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s. Grade D meant Black, immigrant, and poor neighborhoods systematically denied mortgage credit. These designations suppressed minority homeownership for generations and remain a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings and rent burden.

Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), 1935-1940 HOLC residential security maps, aggregated to 2020 census tracts by area share. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

Eviction filings

Court-record eviction history

Court-validated eviction filings collected from county clerks and consolidated by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households.1

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 988Total filings over 6 yrs
  • 28.75%Avg annual filing rate
  • 37.5%Peak (2003)
  • 170Filings in 2006 (latest validated)
Filings by year 2000 to 2006
Year-by-year eviction filings in tract 42043021100
Filings climbed 16% over the past 6 months.
Analysis

What drives eviction risk in Riverside

The poverty rate is 53%. Judgments in high-poverty tracts are collectible far less often than filing counts suggest. It sits 2.7 points above the Dauphin County average of 4.6.

Sitting well above the midpoint, tenant-organizing strength reads 9.7/10. On the high side, court filing pressure reads 9.5/10.

Severe burden reaches 17%. Those are renters paying half their income or more, and that is where non-payment filings originate. Against Dauphin County at 39.0%, 47% of renters here are cost-burdened. Princeton's Eviction Lab logged 988 filings here across 6 tracked years.

The worst year on record was 2003, when 37.5% of renter households were served. In the 1930s the federal Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded this ground D ("Hazardous"). Redlining cut off mortgage credit to whole blocks for decades, and the areas graded D still carry measurably lower ownership and higher rent burden today. In a typical year about 28.8% of renter households face a filing.

That is riskier than roughly 87% of the 84,120 US census tracts in this model.

Tract-level figures come from the ACS 5-year release and are rebuilt whenever that, the court-record feed, or the statutory ledger behind the score changes.

Frequently asked

About tract 42043021100

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for census tract 42043021100?

Census tract 42043021100 in the Riverside neighborhood scores 7.3/10 (Elevated tier). The Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty signals.
Q2

What is the poverty rate in tract 42043021100?

53.2% of residents in tract 42043021100 live below the federal poverty line (ACS B17001, 2023). Population: 3,245.
Q3

How socially vulnerable is tract 42043021100?

CDC Social Vulnerability Index ranks this tract in the 98th percentile nationally. Sub-themes: socioeconomic 92th, household 99th, minority 96th, housing 85th.
Q4

Is tract 42043021100 considered part of Riverside?

Yes. Per Census Bureau 2020 Block Assignment Files, the plurality of blocks in tract 42043021100 fall within Riverside (neighborhood centroid within 0.8 miles, OSM data).
Q5

How many evictions are filed each year in tract 42043021100?

Princeton Eviction Lab recorded 988 eviction filings across 6 validated years in tract 42043021100 (2000-2018). The average annual filing rate is 28.75% of renter households, peaking at 37.5% in 2003. Source: Eviction Lab tract-validated 2024 release.
Q6

How does tract 42043021100 compare to Harrisburg overall?

Tract 42043021100 scores 7.3/10, higher than the parent city of Harrisburg at 5.9/10. City-scale signals (state law, local rent controls, court bias) are inherited from Harrisburg eviction risk; what makes this tract different are its tract-specific economic stress and supply-constraint sub-scores.
Q7

Was tract 42043021100 historically redlined?

Yes. This tract sits inside an area graded by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation in the 1930s, with a dominant grade of D. 6% of the tract's area was rated D ("Hazardous"), the redlined tier. HOLC redlining systematically denied mortgage credit to Black, immigrant, and working-class neighborhoods and remains a documented predictor of present-day eviction filings, rent burden, and homeownership gaps. Source: Mapping Inequality (americanpanorama.org), Robert K. Nelson et al.
Sibling tracts

Highest-risk tracts in Harrisburg

Top eight tracts in Harrisburg ranked by composite eviction-risk score.

Related