Skip to content
Anderson, South Carolina eviction risk overview
Ranked #487 of 1,861 nationally

Anderson, SC

Anderson County · Population 30,051

In 2026
Risk score
6.1
ELEVATED

75th percentile, South Carolina.

50-yr composite history

1976 — 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min2.1 Average3.5 Now6.1
10 5 1976 · score 2.8 1977 · score 2.8 1978 · score 2.9 1979 · score 3.0 1980 · score 2.6 1981 · score 2.7 1982 · score 2.8 1983 · score 2.7 1984 · score 2.1 1985 · score 2.1 1986 · score 2.1 1987 · score 2.2 1988 · score 2.2 1989 · score 2.2 1990 · score 2.3 1991 · score 2.4 1992 · score 2.9 1993 · score 2.9 1994 · score 3.0 1995 · score 3.0 1996 · score 3.0 1997 · score 3.1 1998 · score 3.1 1999 · score 3.2 2000 · score 3.1 2001 · score 3.2 2002 · score 3.3 2003 · score 3.3 2004 · score 3.3 2005 · score 3.3 2006 · score 3.4 2007 · score 3.5 2008 · score 3.8 2009 · score 4.0 2010 · score 4.0 2011 · score 4.1 2012 · score 4.0 2013 · score 4.1 2014 · score 4.2 2015 · score 4.3 2016 · score 4.3 2017 · score 4.4 2018 · score 4.6 2019 · score 4.8 2020 · score 5.4 2021 · score 5.5 2022 · score 5.5 2023 · score 5.5 2024 · score 5.4 2025 · score 6.1 2026 · score 6.1

How Anderson compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Anderson County
#2
of 13 cities
Very High
Rank in county — 92th percentileBottomTop
The 2nd most landlord-risky of 13 cities in Anderson County.
Rank in South Carolina
#137
of 472 cities
Elevated
Rank in state — 71th percentileBottomTop
137th of 472 cities in South Carolina for landlord-risky.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Anderson risk score vs. peersU.S. avg = 5.0Anderson: 6.16.1AndersonThis cityCounty: 5.85.8Countyavg in countyState: 5.05.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.35.3U.S.national avg

Key metrics

  • Tenant beats landlord
    21.4%
    / 100 outcomes
  • Timeline
    43d
    filing → judgment
  • Cost range
    $1.3–3.8k
    legal + lost rent
  • Average rent
    $975
    30% rent-burdened
  • Renters
    48.9%
    of households
  • Poverty
    22.3%
    7.3% unemp.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.6 Regional 3.6 State 2.1 Economic 8.1 Supply 7.4 Rent Control 6.3 Eviction 1.6 Tenant 9.0 Housing 7.3 6.1 ELEVATED
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +47.3% (2024)
    3.6
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.6
  3. State political climate
    South Carolina legislature & governorship
    2.1
  4. Economic stress
    22.3% poverty · 7.3% unemp.
    8.1
  5. Supply constraint
    $975 average · 48.9% renters
    7.4
  6. Rent Control risk
    30.1% rent burden
    6.3
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    43 days filing → judgment
    1.6
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    48.9% renters
    9.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    7.3
Geographic context

Risk heat across Anderson and the region

Click any city to see its score

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 6.1
    / 10 · ELEVATED
    The verdict

    A Elevated-tier market.

    Composite 6.1/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a sharp climb.

    50-yr trend+3.3 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steepening since 2010 · COVID inflection visible

  2. 43d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $975/mo. A contested eviction takes 43 days and costs $1,297–$3,840 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 48.9%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 30,051 residents, 48.9% rent. 30% are rent-burdened, 22.3% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.6
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.6 and 3.6 (GOP margin +47.3% (2024)). State climate at 2.1 — mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.1
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.1/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies — and shows up in process. Eviction process difficulty reads 1.6, housing court bias 7.3, rent-control risk 6.3. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.4 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 8.1
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the real risk.

    Economic stress: 8.1. Supply constraint: 7.4. The numbers behind those: 22.3% poverty, 7.3% unemployment, 30% rent burden.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Anderson sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Greenville, SC · 36d · ~$2.6k all-in ($73/day) · score 3.0 Greenville Charleston, SC · 36d · ~$2.9k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.5 Charleston Columbia, SC · 36d · ~$2.6k all-in ($71/day) · score 3.5 Columbia North Charleston, SC · 37d · ~$2.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.3 North Charleston Mount Pleasant, SC · 41d · ~$2.4k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.5 Mount Pleasant Rock Hill, SC · 37d · ~$2.4k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.9 Rock Hill Summerville, SC · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.5 Summerville Charlotte, NC · 43d · ~$2.9k all-in ($68/day) · score 4.4 Charlotte Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.9 Atlanta Augusta-Richmond County consolidated government, GA · 36d · ~$2.6k all-in ($72/day) · score 5.2 Augusta-Richmond County consolidated government Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.4 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.7 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.2 Memphis Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 7.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.2 Seattle Anderson
Anderson · 43d · ~$2.6k all-in ($60/day) · score 6.1 National median: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Anderson, SC

Landlording in Anderson, South Carolina, presents an elevated-friction market where documented notices and proactive screening matter. The composite eviction risk score is 6.1/10 (ELEVATED tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above — covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Elevated-friction market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Anderson is a city of 30,051 residents where 48.9% of occupied units are renter-occupied and rent burden averages 30.1%. At an average rent of $975/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing — a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Anderson eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 1.6/10 — a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Anderson closes 43 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Anderson's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 7.3/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Anderson runs $1,297 to $3,840 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice — common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 43 days of typical timeline and $975/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 9.0/10 in Anderson, and the city carries meaningful rent control exposure (6.3/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5–3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks — but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In South Carolina, deposit cap and refund window are statute — exceed at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Anderson: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a ELEVATED tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one — retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match South Carolina's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $3,840 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Anderson

Trap · 6.3/10
Comparative benchmarking matters in markets like this. Anderson's 6.1/10 is near the South Carolina state average. Rent-control-risk sub-score: 6.3/10. See the nearby cities grid below for direct A-vs-B comparison.
05Peers

Cities with similar landlord eviction risk

05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the fastest way to get a non-paying tenant out in Anderson?

The fastest way is often "cash for keys." Offering a tenant a lump sum, say $500-$1000, to move out voluntarily and leave the property in good condition, can bypass the entire court process, saving weeks of time and thousands in potential legal fees and lost rent. It's not always possible, but always worth considering.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in Anderson, SC?

South Carolina eviction laws does not have a statewide "just-cause" eviction requirement, meaning you generally don't need a specific reason beyond lease violations (like non-payment) or the expiration of a lease term to evict. However, you must still provide proper notice (e.g., 30-day notice for no-cause termination) and follow the legal process.
Q3

How much notice do I have to give before raising rent in Anderson?

South Carolina eviction laws law doesn't specify a minimum notice period for rent increases, but it's generally good practice to give at least 30 days' written notice, especially if your lease is month-to-month. If you have a fixed-term lease, you can only raise rent after the lease term expires, and you should notify the tenant before renewing. Anderson eviction risk has a rent-control-risk sub-score of 6.3, so stay updated on South Carolina rent control rules.
Q4

What happens if the tenant appeals the eviction?

If a tenant appeals an eviction judgment in Anderson eviction risk, it can significantly prolong the process. The case moves to a higher court, and you'll almost certainly need an attorney. Appeals can add months to the timeline and thousands to your legal costs. This is another reason to ensure your initial case is airtight.
Q5

Can I turn off utilities if a tenant stops paying rent?

Absolutely not. Turning off utilities, changing locks, or otherwise attempting to self-help evict a tenant in South Carolina eviction laws is illegal and can lead to significant penalties, including fines and damages owed to the tenant. Always follow the proper legal eviction process. Refer to South Carolina tenant protections for more details.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 6.1/10 places Anderson in the 75th percentile of South Carolina cities on the composite eviction risk index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1–10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has risen sharply since 1976 — a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.