Skip to content
Spartanburg, South Carolina eviction risk overview
Ranked #1,777 of 1,861 nationally

Spartanburg, SC

Spartanburg County · Population 38,910

In 2026
Risk score
2.8
LOW

1th percentile, South Carolina.

50-yr composite history

1976 — 2026 · climbing fast since 2010

Min1.5 Average2.2 Now2.8
10 5 1976 · score 2.4 1977 · score 2.4 1978 · score 2.4 1979 · score 2.4 1980 · score 2.1 1981 · score 2.1 1982 · score 2.2 1983 · score 2.1 1984 · score 1.5 1985 · score 1.5 1986 · score 1.5 1987 · score 1.5 1988 · score 1.5 1989 · score 1.5 1990 · score 1.6 1991 · score 1.6 1992 · score 2.1 1993 · score 2.2 1994 · score 2.2 1995 · score 2.2 1996 · score 2.2 1997 · score 2.2 1998 · score 2.2 1999 · score 2.2 2000 · score 1.9 2001 · score 1.9 2002 · score 2.0 2003 · score 2.0 2004 · score 2.0 2005 · score 2.0 2006 · score 2.0 2007 · score 2.0 2008 · score 2.4 2009 · score 2.5 2010 · score 2.5 2011 · score 2.6 2012 · score 2.5 2013 · score 2.5 2014 · score 2.5 2015 · score 2.5 2016 · score 2.4 2017 · score 2.5 2018 · score 2.5 2019 · score 2.6 2020 · score 2.9 2021 · score 2.9 2022 · score 2.9 2023 · score 2.9 2024 · score 2.8 2025 · score 2.8 2026 · score 2.8

How Spartanburg compares

Risk score vs. peers, county, state, and the U.S.
Rank in Spartanburg County
#33
of 33 cities
Very Low
Rank in county — 0th percentileBottomTop
33rd of 33 cities in Spartanburg County for landlord-risky.
Rank in South Carolina
#470
of 472 cities
Very Low
Rank in state — 0th percentileBottomTop
470th of 472 cities in South Carolina for landlord-risky.
vs. county · state · U.S.
Spartanburg risk score vs. peersU.S. avg = 5.0Spartanburg: 2.82.8SpartanburgThis cityCounty: 4.94.9Countyavg in countyState: 5.05.0Stateavg in stateU.S.: 5.35.3U.S.national avg

Key metrics

  • Tenant beats landlord
    4.0%
    / 100 outcomes
  • Timeline
    39d
    filing → judgment
  • Cost range
    $1.5–4.0k
    legal + lost rent
  • Average rent
    $1,099
    32% rent-burdened
  • Renters
    46.1%
    of households
  • Poverty
    24.1%
    7.0% unemp.
Time machine

Scrub 50 years

2026
● LIVE · today ◀ REPLAY · historical

Nine-axis profile

9-axis profile · today

Shape of the risk surface

1 landlord · 10 tenant
Local 3.0 Regional 3.0 State 2.5 Economic 5.5 Supply 3.5 Rent Control 1.0 Eviction 2.0 Tenant 2.0 Housing 2.5 2.8 LOW
Sub-scores · with sparkline

Where the score comes from

1 → 10 scale
  1. Local political climate
    GOP margin +33.6% (2024)
    3.0
  2. Regional political climate
    County-weighted neighbor mix
    3.0
  3. State political climate
    South Carolina legislature & governorship
    2.5
  4. Economic stress
    24.1% poverty · 7.0% unemp.
    5.5
  5. Supply constraint
    $1,099 average · 46.1% renters
    3.5
  6. Rent Control risk
    32.3% rent burden
    1.0
  7. Eviction process difficulty
    39 days filing → judgment
    2.0
  8. Tenant organizing strength
    46.1% renters
    2.0
  9. Housing court bias
    County bench composition
    2.5
Geographic context

Risk heat across Spartanburg and the region

Click any city to see its score

Score story

Six-stop tour of the risk profile

  1. 2.8
    / 10 · LOW
    The verdict

    A Low-tier market.

    Composite 2.8/10. Mid-range market; standard documentation usually wins. The 50-year curve shows a slow, steady climb.

    50-yr trend+0.4 over 50 yr
    197620012026

    Steady ratchet · no large swings

  2. 39d
    Typical timeline
    The money

    What renting (and evicting) looks like.

    Rent published at $1,099/mo. A contested eviction takes 39 days and costs $1,507–$4,016 per case.

    50-yr trendCalendar drag rising since '15
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  3. 46.1%
    Renters
    The renters

    Who you'll be renting to.

    Out of 38,910 residents, 46.1% rent. 32% are rent-burdened, 24.1% below the poverty line.

    50-yr trendRenter share rising
    197620012026

    ACS 1970-present · once the migration overlay is in.

  4. 3.0
    Local + regional
    The politics

    Light-statute interior market.

    Local & regional political climate score 3.0 and 3.0 (GOP margin +33.6% (2024)). State climate at 2.5 — mid-range statehouse.

    50-yr trendTracks county vote margin
    197620012026

    Built on 50-yr presidential margins back to 1976.

  5. 2.5
    State politics
    The process

    Moderate calendar, moderate friction.

    State political climate 2.5/10 sets the legislative ceiling for landlord remedies — and shows up in process. Eviction process difficulty reads 2.0, housing court bias 2.5, rent-control risk 1.0. Standard process speed for the state.

    50-yr trendProcess difficulty +-3.0 since '00
    197620012026

    Court-clerk data lands in the next release.

  6. 5.5
    Economic stress
    The stress

    Economic pressure is the background risk.

    Economic stress: 5.5. Supply constraint: 3.5. The numbers behind those: 24.1% poverty, 7.0% unemployment, 32% rent burden.

    50-yr trendTwo visible dips · '08 + COVID
    197620012026

    Mirrors BLS unemployment series.

US eviction landscape · timeline × all-in cost

Spartanburg sits in the quick & cheap quadrant

Bubble size = population · color = risk score
QUICK BUT COSTLY fast docket · high all-in loss SLOW & EXPENSIVE long calendar · high all-in loss QUICK & CHEAP fast docket · low all-in loss SLOW BUT CHEAP long calendar · low all-in loss 30d 50d 75d 100d 150d 200d 300d 450d $2.0k $3.0k $5.0k $7.5k $10k $15k $20k $30k EVICTION TIMELINE (DAYS) → ↑ ALL-IN COST (LOG SCALE) Greenville, SC · 36d · ~$2.6k all-in ($73/day) · score 3.0 Greenville Charleston, SC · 36d · ~$2.9k all-in ($80/day) · score 3.5 Charleston Columbia, SC · 36d · ~$2.6k all-in ($71/day) · score 3.5 Columbia North Charleston, SC · 37d · ~$2.6k all-in ($69/day) · score 3.3 North Charleston Mount Pleasant, SC · 41d · ~$2.4k all-in ($57/day) · score 2.5 Mount Pleasant Rock Hill, SC · 37d · ~$2.4k all-in ($65/day) · score 2.9 Rock Hill Summerville, SC · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($70/day) · score 2.5 Summerville Charlotte, NC · 43d · ~$2.9k all-in ($68/day) · score 4.4 Charlotte Greensboro, NC · 44d · ~$2.7k all-in ($61/day) · score 4.3 Greensboro Winston-Salem, NC · 48d · ~$3.2k all-in ($66/day) · score 3.8 Winston-Salem Houston, TX · 24d · ~$2.5k all-in ($103/day) · score 3.4 Houston Phoenix, AZ · 38d · ~$3.3k all-in ($86/day) · score 3.7 Phoenix Memphis, TN · 31d · ~$2.0k all-in ($66/day) · score 4.2 Memphis Atlanta, GA · 40d · ~$2.8k all-in ($69/day) · score 4.9 Atlanta Boston, MA · 187d · ~$20.3k all-in ($109/day) · score 8.1 Boston Chicago, IL · 109d · ~$9.0k all-in ($82/day) · score 6.8 Chicago New York, NY · 417d · ~$29.5k all-in ($71/day) · score 7.8 New York Seattle, WA · 162d · ~$12.7k all-in ($79/day) · score 8.2 Seattle Spartanburg
Spartanburg · 39d · ~$2.8k all-in ($71/day) · score 2.8 National median: 58d · $4.6k all-in Hover any bubble for stats · click to open Color: 0–4   4–7   7–10
00Overview

About eviction risk in Spartanburg, SC

Landlording in Spartanburg, South Carolina, presents a manageable operating environment for documented landlords. The composite eviction risk score is 2.8/10 (LOW tier), drawn from the nine sub-axes shown above — covering rent-control exposure, eviction-process difficulty, housing-court bias, tenant-organizing strength, supply constraint, economic stress, and local, regional, and state political climate. This is not a quick-fix market: it's a Mid-tier market where lease drafting, screening discipline, and well-documented notices materially change outcomes.

Spartanburg is a city of 38,910 residents where 46.1% of occupied units are renter-occupied and rent burden averages 32.3%. At an average rent of $1,099/month, the typical renter household here spends more than the federal 30% threshold on housing — a leading indicator of payment volatility and a precondition for the kinds of tenant defenses that show up most often in housing court.

01Process

How Spartanburg eviction process actually works

Eviction process difficulty here reads 2.0/10 — a number that combines statutory complexity (notice categories, just-cause rules, mandatory pre-filing disclosures) with operational realities (court calendar length and clerk responsiveness). The typical contested filing in Spartanburg closes 39 days after the initial notice. For non-payment of rent the first step is a properly-formatted, properly-served pay-or-quit notice; for material lease breaches it's a cure-or-quit; for tenancies under just-cause protection an at-fault grounds notice (or a no-fault notice with statutory relocation assistance) is required.

The slow part of Spartanburg's timeline is usually the calendar, not the motion practice. Housing court bias scores 2.5/10 here, meaning judges read borderline procedural defects in the tenant's favor more often than the national norm. The practical implication: every notice and every proof of service needs to be airtight before it gets filed.

02Cost

What it costs (and how long it takes)

An all-in eviction in Spartanburg runs $1,507 to $4,016 per case once you account for filing fees, attorney time, lost rent during pendency, sheriff lockout, and unit turnover. That range is wide because the upper bound assumes a tenant answer plus motion practice — common when housing court bias is high. The lower bound assumes a default judgment after proper service.

For landlords running the numbers on holding costs vs. cash-for-keys: if your projected timeline times your monthly rent already exceeds the high-end cost number, cash-for-keys at 1–2 months' rent is typically the economically rational choice. With 39 days of typical timeline and $1,099/month in lost rent, that crossover happens fast here.

03Operations

Security deposits, screening, and lease terms

Tenant organizing strength scores 2.0/10 in Spartanburg, and the city has limited rent control exposure (1.0/10). Operations practice that survives audit in this environment looks like:

  • Screening discipline. Document income (verified at 2.5–3x rent), credit (with a clear minimum), and prior-tenancy reference checks — but do not screen on protected categories or source-of-income where banned. Keep a written, consistent screening criteria document for every applicant.
  • Lease specificity. Use a state-specific lease that names every term clearly: rent due date, late fees within statutory caps, deposit handling, smoke and CO disclosure, lead paint disclosure (pre-1978 stock), and a clean attorney's-fees clause.
  • Security deposit handling. Itemize deductions within the statutory window. Photograph move-in/move-out condition. In South Carolina, deposit cap and refund window are statute — exceed at your own risk.
  • Mid-tenancy documentation. Keep date-stamped records of every rent receipt, every habitability request, every notice served. The day you need them in court is too late to start.
04Strategy

What an everyday landlord should actually do here

If you own one to four units in Spartanburg: hire a property manager who knows the local court. The pricing differential between self-managing and hiring out is small relative to the cost of one botched eviction in a LOW tier market. If you own five or more: build relationships with a local landlord-side attorney before you need one — retainer fees are negligible compared to emergency-rate billing when an eviction is already moving.

The avoidable mistakes here are all upstream of the filing: weak screening, an informal lease, sloppy rent receipts, and notice templates pulled off the internet that don't match South Carolina's statutory language. Fix those four, and most cases settle or default. Skip them, and a $4,016 all-in fight is the realistic worst case.

04bPractical traps

Local traps to avoid in Spartanburg

Trap · 7.7/10
For landlords, the 6.4/10 score is most actionable when combined with Spartanburg County's specific court behavior. Housing-court bias sub-score: 7.7/10. Use proactive screening and documented notices.
05Peers

Cities with similar landlord eviction risk

05FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Q1

What's the most common mistake landlords make during eviction in Spartanburg?

The biggest mistake is waiting. Landlords often delay issuing the 5-day pay-or-quit notice, hoping the tenant will eventually pay. Every day you wait means more lost rent and a longer overall process. Act decisively and follow the legal steps promptly.
Q2

Can I evict a tenant for any reason in Spartanburg?

South Carolina eviction laws does not have statewide "just-cause" eviction requirements. For month-to-month tenancies, you can terminate with a 30-day notice without stating a specific reason, as long as it's not discriminatory or retaliatory. For tenants on a lease, you generally need a lease violation (like non-payment) or the lease term to end.
Q3

How much notice do I need to give for a rent increase?

For month-to-month tenancies, you typically need to provide at least 30 days' written notice before increasing rent. If there's a fixed-term lease, you cannot increase the rent until the lease term expires, unless the lease specifically allows for it.
Q5

Can I handle the eviction process myself, or do I need a lawyer?

For straightforward non-payment evictions in magistrate court, many landlords can successfully represent themselves. However, if the tenant disputes the eviction, claims issues with the property, or if you're unsure about any step, hiring a local attorney is highly recommended to ensure compliance and a successful outcome.
Q6

What if my tenant refuses to leave after the court orders eviction?

If the court grants an eviction and the tenant still doesn't leave, you'll need to coordinate with the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Office to schedule a physical lockout. This is the final step in removing a tenant, and it must be done by law enforcement. Do not attempt to remove a tenant or their belongings yourself.
06Score

What this score means for landlords2

A 2.8/10 places Spartanburg in the 1th percentile of South Carolina cities on the composite eviction risk index. The score is the average of the nine sub-axes, all calibrated on a national 1–10 scale where 1 is most landlord-friendly and 10 is most tenant-protective. The 50-year reconstruction shows this score has climbed steadily since 1976 — a structural drift driven by court-calendar growth, rent-control adoption, and the rise of tenant-side legal aid. The trajectory matters more than the snapshot: the score is the climate, not the weather.