Skip to content
Neighborhood · Southern Shops, SC

Rolling Green Eviction Risk: Moderate

1 census tracts · pop 2,035 · pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score 4.9/10 · range 4.9–4.9

Rolling Green is a white-hispanic neighborhood in Southern Shops with 1 census tract and a population of 2,035 residents. The neighborhood's pop-weighted eviction-risk score of 4.9/10 (Moderate tier) blends state law, county-level filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income ratios + poverty. 47% of renters here pay at least 30% of household income on rent, and 5% are severely cost-burdened (≥50% of income). Average gross rent of $955/month sits 10% lower than the Southern Shops citywide average ($1,058).

Risk score
4.9
Moderate
1 tracts · population-weighted
Rolling Green vs Southern Shops How this neighborhood stacks against the citywide average
% of income on rent
47.1% +46%
Southern Shops: 32.2%
Average gross rent
$955 -10%
Southern Shops: $1,058
Average HH income
$36,656 +5%
Southern Shops: $35,016
Poverty rate
9.4% -79%
Southern Shops: 44.2%
Renter share
49.0% -2%
Southern Shops: 50.1%
Peer neighborhoods

Neighborhoods with similar eviction risk

Same county, closest by Eviction Risk Score.

Geographic context

Risk heat across Rolling Green and the region

Click any tract to drill in · 1 tracts span score 4.9–4.9

Why Rolling Green scores 4.9

9 axes · pop-weighted · 1 = landlord-friendly
State political climate
legislature & governorship · Range 2.1–2.1 across tracts
2.1
Regional political climate
County-level mix · 2024 presidential margin · Range 3.6–3.6 across tracts
3.6
Local political climate
Parent city governance · Range 4.3–4.3 across tracts
4.3
Rent control risk
47% of income on rent · Range 7.1–7.1 across tracts
7.1
Eviction process difficulty
State notice requirements & court backlog · Range 2.4–2.4 across tracts
2.4
Tenant organizing strength
49% renter households · Range 9.2–9.2 across tracts
9.2
Housing court bias
County bench composition · Range 8.4–8.4 across tracts
8.4
Economic stress
9.4% below poverty line · Range 2.4–2.4 across tracts
2.4
Supply constraint
Rent-to-FMR gap & zoning friction · Range 2.9–2.9 across tracts
2.9
Risk score comparison

Rolling Green vs. parent city, state, U.S.

Eviction Risk Score (0–10 scale).

Rolling Green score vs. parent city, state, U.S.Rolling Green: 4.94.9Rolling GreenNeighborhoodParent city: 2.92.9Parent cityhost cityState: 2.52.5Stateavg in stateU.S.: 4.74.7U.S.national avgU.S. avg = 5.0
Census tracts

1 tracts in Rolling Green

Ranked highest-risk first. Click for per-tract detail.

Tract Score Pop % over 30% on rent Average rent
45083021804 4.9 2,035 47% $955
Social Vulnerability Index

CDC SVI percentile: 76

Pop-weighted across 1 tracts. Higher = more vulnerable to disaster, displacement, and rent shocks. Source: CDC/ATSDR SVI 2022.

Socioeconomic status 90%ile
Poverty, unemployment, no-HS-diploma, housing cost burden
Household characteristics 66%ile
Single-parent HH, disability, language barriers, age 17- / 65+
Racial/ethnic minority 69%ile
Hispanic + non-white share of population
Housing & transport 39%ile
Multi-unit structures, mobile homes, crowding, no vehicle
Eviction filings · Princeton Eviction Lab

Court-record eviction history in Rolling Green

Aggregated across 1 validated constituent tract. Filing rate is filings per 100 renter households, pop-weighted.

Historic baseline (2000–2018)

  • 54Total filings (sum)
  • 18.18%Avg annual filing rate
  • 18.2%Peak year (2010)
  • 18.18%Latest filed (2010)
CDC PLACES 2023 · pop-weighted

Eviction-adjacent indicators in Rolling Green

Average across all constituent tracts, population-weighted. Source: CDC PLACES (cwsq-ngmh) crude prevalence.

Frequently asked

About Rolling Green

Q1

What is the eviction-risk score for Rolling Green?

Rolling Green scores 4.9/10 (Moderate tier) across 1 census tracts. The pop-weighted Eviction Risk Score blends state law, county filing rates, parent-city politics, and tract-specific rent-to-income and poverty signals.
Q2

How does Rolling Green compare to Southern Shops overall?

Rolling Green scores 2.0 points higher than Southern Shops overall (2.9/10). Renters spend 47% of income on rent vs 32% citywide. Average rent: $955 vs $1,058.
Q3

What is the average rent in Rolling Green?

Average gross rent in Rolling Green is $955/month (pop-weighted across 1 census tracts, ACS 5-year 2023). 47% of renter households are cost-burdened.
Q4

What percentage of Rolling Green residents are renters?

49% of Rolling Green households are renter-occupied (vs 50% in Southern Shops). The neighborhood has 2,035 residents.
Q5

Is Rolling Green a high social-vulnerability area?

Rolling Green sits in the 76th percentile nationally on the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (highly vulnerable). The index combines poverty, unemployment, household composition, racial/ethnic minority share, and housing/transportation factors across all US census tracts.
Q6

How safe is Rolling Green for landlords?

Rolling Green carries a moderate-tier eviction-risk profile for landlords (4.9/10). Pop-weighted across 1 constituent tracts, the score blends parent-city rent-control posture, county eviction-process timelines, and tract-specific rent-to-income / poverty signals. Compared to Southern Shops as a whole (2.9/10), this neighborhood is higher-risk.
Q7

What is the demographic breakdown of Rolling Green?

Rolling Green has 2,014 residents (White-Hispanic Neighborhood). Top groups: White (non-Hispanic) (46.3%), Hispanic / Latino (33.4%), Black (non-Hispanic) (17.4%). Source: ACS 5-year 2023, table B03002.
Nearby

Other neighborhoods near Rolling Green

Sibling neighborhoods

Other neighborhoods inside Southern Shops

Same parent city, ranked by score similarity to Rolling Green.

Zoom out

Up the geography chain · or explore further